We may have been wrong all along. Perhaps it is evil that is at the root of all money. The report of the Justice Mudgal commission deals not in philosophy but in the practice of sport. It should have lit a fire under the smug behinds of the BCCI. Yet the governing body didn’t think the Indian Premier League or indeed cricket in India was in any crisis.
Vice-president Rajeev Shukla (and former IPL chairman) said airily, “The good thing that the Supreme Court has done is that the IPL auction was not stopped.” I am not sure he didn’t add a “Phew!” to that. Forget the lies, the betting, bringing the game into disrepute. Forget the fact that the most successful team in the IPL might be thrown out. At least the auction was untouched. How obscene!
It was as if Kafka and Orwell had got together to write a script where a giant insect spouts Newspeak.
The Indian cricket captain lied to the commission. So did the president of the BCCI. That alone is enough to (metaphorically) hang two of the most powerful men in world cricket today. But this is not about Mahendra Singh Dhoni or N. Srinivasan. It is about the pusillanimity of the cricketing fraternity, and the lack of real men in the BCCI who care enough about the game to cleanse it. There seems to be too much at stake—money, power, influence—for rules to be taken seriously.
Dhoni and Srinivasan maintained that Gurunath Meiyappan was merely “an enthusiastic (sic)”, a fiction that was created to save Chennai Super Kings from being scratched when his off-field activities first came to light. The commission’s report has given the lie to that claim. If the IPL follows its own rules, then CSK must be scratched. The much-quoted Rule 11.3 says simply that if any official, team owner or anyone associated with the team tarnishes the image of the league, the franchise can be terminated immediately. Other teams have been kicked out for less. Sometimes you save a son-in-law at the cost of losing a successful cricket team.
Betting is illegal in India; betting on a team you are associated with is immoral too, and strikes at the very essence of a sporting contest. And if you have used insider knowledge for personal gain, you should be condemned to spending eternity batting against Malcolm Marshall and Shoaib Akhtar without a helmet.
The report points to the sense of entitlement among those involved with the IPL. “I did not know betting was illegal in India,” is a juvenile comment from another whose conduct begs to be investigated more deeply. The Rajasthan Royals’ Raj Kundra and his wife may have also bet on matches. The details do not matter. The act of betting alone renders a person unfit to own a team or be an official. The criminal cases may take time, and those named will only be too happy to delay proceedings, but the Mudgal commission has told us where to look and what to look for, and that is its strength.
Whose is the most startling statement in the commission’s report? That honour belongs to Sundar Raman, the IPL CEO. “Ownership structures of teams are in general ambiguous,” he confessed; look no further for the fount of corruption. Corruption follows money follows corruption in a vicious circle.
And we haven’t even got to the spot-fixing yet.
The three-man commission appointed by the Supreme Court has merely confirmed what some of us have been banging on about all along. I apologise for quoting myself, but here is what I said in the Wisden India Almanack while suggesting an IPL holiday, a suspension of the tournament for a year or two while the Augean stables are cleansed: “Conflict of interest and lack of context were built into the system. Due diligence was ignored in the matter of television contracts, auctions, and team responsibilities. Rules were made on the fly. It is time to have clear ownership patterns, proper information regarding those in charge of teams and the background of the companies involved in the IPL.”
The future of Indian cricket is, in some ways, in the hands of the Supreme Court. On March 7, it will respond to the Mudgal commission’s recommendations which include independence for investigating agencies, a stand-alone body for the IPL, and dos and don’ts for players and their agents. The BCCI’s initial reaction was to dismiss the report for being “based on assumptions”.
The cricketing fraternity has been saying for a long while that “something needs to be done”, and now that the highest court in the land has entered the picture, there is suddenly hope. The biggest service Justice Mudgal and his colleagues have rendered is to simply reinforce the need for a thorough investigation, to endorse the conviction that something needs to be done. This could be a turning point for the sport in India.
(The author is editor, Wisden India Almanack)
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
"...This could be a turning point for the sport in India...."
"...This could be a turning point for the sport in India...."
Laughable - the dependence on the judiciary to deliver.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT