Bertil Lintner, who challenges Maxwell’s thesis, shares some of his views on key overlooked questions while dealing with the Sino-Indian war.
Is the Henderson Brooks report adequate to understand the 1962 conflict?
The Henderson Brooks report examined lacunae in India’s defence before the 1962 war, but it does not explain why China attacked. One has to put the ’62 war in context—then it becomes clear that it had more to do with internal power struggles in China than the border dispute, or Nehru’s forward policy.
What was the internal struggle in China?
Mao Zedong launched his ‘Great Leap Forward’ in 1958 and it lasted until 1961, in which an estimated 18 million to 31 million died from starvation. It was a disaster and Mao had to take the blame for it. He would have been purged by his critics in the ruling Communist Party. To regain power and sideline his enemies, he indentified an ‘outside enemy’ and decided to rally the party and, more importantly, the army against it. India became that country. It had granted asylum to the Dalai Lama and allowed him to set up a government in exile on its soil. Additionally, there was also the excuse of the border dispute.
Neville Maxwell, who put the Henderson report on his website, thinks Indians should read it for a better understanding of the conflict. What do you think?
That’s rubbish. Maxwell should broaden his horizons and realise that the border dispute was not the reason for the 1962 war. It is worth noting that China, in January 1961—a year before the war—sent a combined force of three divisions, or 20,000 men, of regulars from its People’s Liberation Army across the border into northeastern Myanmar. The target was a string of secret, Nationalist Chinese Kuomintang camps across the border in Myanmar, which were used to launch raids into China. It was swift and over in a matter of weeks. Then, the Chinese troops withdrew to their side of the border—just as they did a year later in India’s Northeast.
So you see a link between these two?
I often look at the 1961 Mekong River Operation as a ‘rehearsal’ for the even bigger operation that occurred in 1962.
How did it help Mao?
You can see what Mao gained from all this. He managed to reposition himself within the party; the army was won over; and his enemies were sidelined, even purged, not Mao.
What areas is Maxwell glossing over?
Maxwell glosses over the geopolitical factors behind the 1962 war, or, I would argue, he is probably unaware of them. His approach to the issue is superficial and lacks substance.
Very well said, Bertil Lintner. The war had a lot to do with China's desire to punish India for daring to give the Dalai Lama refuge, and to form a government in exile. Maxwell has a disease called forwardpolicitis.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT