There was embarrassment in store for the poll bound BJP in Gujarat when the wife of late Haren Pandya, one of its rising stars snuffed out in the prime of life , pitched into the election battle as the candidate of rebel patriarch Keshubhai Patel’s regional outfit.
”I am contesting from my husband’s constituency of Ellisbridge in Ahmedabad seeking justice for him from the people’s court,” she added, announcing her candidature on Thursday.
Haren Pandya , a former BJP minister earned the ire of Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi when he refused to vacate his Ellisbridge seat to enable him to get elected to the Vidhan Sabha in 2001. Modi had to contest from Rajkot to fulfil the mandatory requirement as he was not an elected legislator when he became the chief minister replacing Keshubhai Patel. Pandya was killed on March 26, 2003 while on a morning walk in a plush part of the city. Haren Pandya was earlier the minister of state for home in the Keshubhai Patel government.
Jagruti makes it clear that her husband’s killing was a political murder and her decade long fight for justice has been in vain. ”I shall nevertheless continue with my battle undaunted, “ she maintains.
“Justice for Haren" is her poll cry, as she pitches in while expressing her dejection with the BJP. ”My husband gave his life for the party but he was betrayed both in life and death,” she points out, her voice quivering as she tried vainly to get a hold over her emotions.
The wife of the former BJP minister targets Modi without naming him. ”From a party with an ideology it is now a one man outfit bereft of all that once constituted its core. And it is for this reason that I have chosen the Gujarat Parivartan Party headed by Keshubhai Patel as it still follows Deen Dayal Upadhyaya’s political beliefs,” she adds.
It is common knowledge that the estrangement between Modi and Pandya began in February 2002 after the former took over as chief minister and wanted the latter to vacate his Ellisbridge seat in Ahmedabad to enable him to get elected to the Vidhan Sabha. Pandya refused to do so and Modi had to contest from Rajkot. Pandya’s deposition before the ‘peoples commission’ on the 2002 communal riots that followed the Godhra train carnage on February 27, 2002 that reportedly implicated the Gujarat chief minister further fuelled the raging fire between the two.
Haren’s father Vithal Pandya was direct in pointing fingers at the Gujarat chief minister while his wife Jagruti has all along held that the wrong people had been implicated in the murder while the real killers went scot free.
A Pota court had sentenced 9 people to life imprisonment and three to rigorous imprisonment in June 2007 for the murder but the High Court in August 2011 acquitted all of them of the charge and held that the CBI had botched up the case.
Jagruti has been demanding reinvestigation of the case which was probed by the CBI during NDA rule when L.K.Advani was the home minister. Interestingly, it was the crime branch of the Gujarat police then headed by D.G.Vanzara which first investigated the case. Later when it was handed over to the CBI, a Gujarat cadre IPS officer Abhay Chudasama was temporarily transferred to the CBI for a month to help out with the case. Both are now in jail in connection with the Sohrabuddin Sheikh fake encounter case while the then minister of state for home is out on bail in the same case.
Jagruti is in the fray for justice in her husband’s case.
With speculation rife that the Congress may not put up a candidate against her, the contest can well turn into a straight one between an old BJP loyalists wife and the BJP. This will split the party cadres and may well put the ruling party in an awkward spot. For the record, Jagruti is fighting the election in a triangular contest with BJP's Rakesh Shah, while Congress is yet to announce the name of its candidate on the seat. Ellisbridge is a BJP bastion in peril.
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
It is quite but natural irrespective of idealogy the inner spirit of any body gets wake up for call.Within in the ranks and file of Hindutva protogonists cleavage will soon emerge and Mr. Haren Pandya real murderes is likely to surface sooner or later.
Not only political murders to eliminate the opponents, encounter killings what about the Gas exploration Scam and deal between GSPC AND GEO GLOBAL a Caribean based Island of Barbados company which is mere one man company on paper of Jean Paul Roy which has surfaced about the cronyism & capitalism of the CM under his leadership and during the term of NDA scan running up to 20,000crores.
Clever people of the country must open their heart and mind and where is Annas gang Arvind Kejriwals Aaam Aadm cohorts now. Why dont they fight for this and bring the truth before the nation do decide which party meets peoples aspirations.
Mishraji ke haseen sapney....lol
BTW, if this woman loses, then are we to assume justice is denied? Or justice is postponed?
I pity this woman. Regardless of what happens, she will thrown out like an used tissue paper once the election is over. Even if she wins, she wont amount to much. And if she loses, far worse.
If somebody is murdered, then the spouse of the murdered must be made a MLA. THat is justice. Dont know under what section of IPC this comes in but I am afraid there are not that many seats compared to that many murders.
<<the contest can well turn into a straight one between an old BJP loyalists wife and the BJP.>>
Without an apostrophe on loyalists, the line has dubious meaning.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT