Banned book: Jayalalithaa: A Portrait, Penguin, 2012
Status: Permanent injunction against the book in 2012
What happens to an author who toils over a book, say a biography, for two years, searching for source material, fixing interviews, tracing persons long forgotten, and when the book is ready to be released she suddenly faces a court injunction against its release? How does an author with limited sources even try to get the court injunction overturned when the exasperated publisher feels that it is more prudent to abide by the verdict than to “fight for the big idea”? Legal cases are expensive. True. Time-consuming too, agreed. And the question arises, is the fight worth the trouble? Especially if the fight is against a formidable political power? There are millions of safe titles that get printed every year. What if a book that has become a problem meets with a silent death? The author be damned.
When I was commissioned by Penguin (who had published my book Cut-outs, Caste and Cine Stars) to write a book on Jayalalitha, and I agreed after a good deal of thought, neither of us, of course, knew what we were in for. I had had a good relationship with Penguin during my earlier book, and the second book, though one of the most challenging assignments I have had, was done with great care and meticulous editing. The final draft of the manuscript was shown to lawyers for legal scrutiny and facts verified. The book was about to be released when Outlook magazine decided to bring out a cover story on it as a curtain-raiser. I was a little apprehensive about it, but gave an interview to the magazine after consulting my publisher. What appeared in the magazine (March 21, 2011) were like excerpts from the book but they were just portions from the conversation the reporter had with me. Not a single line was from the book. The title of the cover was provocative enough—Jayalalitha: The Untold Story. A week before the release in April, I was informed about the court injunction against the book. The sense of shock I felt was stupefying. I have always championed the cause of freedom of expression and I suddenly felt numb and powerless, unable to understand how a court could give an injunction before the book was released. The din of 2011 Tamil Nadu assembly election campaign had subsided and the results were awaited. When the results came, it was clear that Jayalalitha had won a massive mandate.
The author became a non-entity. A mere zero, who could be dismissed and destroyed with a stroke of a pen. Penguin went silent and there has been no direct contact with the publisher after that. More shocking and painful was the silence of the media, English and Tamil, in Tamil Nadu. The matter never crossed the borders of the state: if it did, there was no sign of it. I was made to feel like a criminal convicted for no reason at all.
The injunction against a biography of a public figure signals a warning to Indian publishers that hereafter no biography can be written in India. It is indeed ironical. Biographies of successful men and women need to be written. My book was a journalist’s attempt to understand the enigmatic persona of the most colourful, dynamic and determined woman politician that Tamil Nadu has ever seen. Her lonely battle overcoming the odds against her—as a woman, as a Brahmin, as a former actress, and her emergence as a tough politician who became the chief minister of the state not once but three times is so extraordinary a narrative, that I believe it needs to be told.
What is it that makes an injunction against a book so easy? Why is it authors are helpless and vulnerable despite the constitutional guarantee of freedom of expression? Why is it in a free democratic society we still fear the might of political power and of fringe religious groups?
Unfortunately, all the uneasy questions are resolved ‘pragmatically’ and not rationally. In such a scenario, the premature death of a book matters little.
Deapite all the tall claims of India's democracy and tolerance we are still seeped in bigotry.It is really scary to carry out work for the benefit of public causes as there is no support from either the judiciary or the people.I do not think the situation will improve in the near future and people need to be prepared for a long haul,probably generations to come.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT