The year was 1996. The BJP had emerged as the biggest party after a heated general election. Cause for celebration, although its government lasted just 13 days. But, at a function in Gujarat to felicitate Atal Behari Vajpayee and L.K Advani, microphones, chairs, other objects flew as leaders and workers of the party’s fractious Gujarat unit came to blows. The venerable state minister Atmaram Patel was beaten, his dhoti was stripped and shredded, and pieces were carried away by party workers as trophies. A cowering Patel covered his modesty with a party banner.
At odds with CM Keshubhai Patel, Narendra Modi, who was ‘exiled’ from Gujarat by the BJP, was holding forth at the party’s Delhi headquarters. He could barely contain his glee when the discussion turned to the free-for-all event. “You may be shocked,” Modi volunteered, “but in Gujarat it is a ‘parampara’ (tradition) that when old people misbehave, they are stripped of their dhotis.” Fast forward to 2014, and understand that some old BJP men are being treated to an old Gujarati ‘parampara’.
Why the controversy over a ticket for patriarch and proud Ram rath yatri Advani? Why the question of his contesting from Bhopal when he has been representing Gandhinagar? Party insiders believe that he, along with loyalist Sushma Swaraj, have a Plan B in place in the event of the BJP winning less than 180 seats—that is, less than what the party bagged in 1998 and again in 1999.
Advani and Modi fell out a long time ago. It was feared that Modi could even sabotage his prospects from Gandhinagar. If the BJP were to get less than 180 seats, expect another factional war in the party. In that scenario, Advani could himself emerge as choice for PM or propose Swaraj with the solid backing of Madhya Pradesh CM Shivraj Singh Chouhan, who is hoping to bring the largest contingent of BJP MPs from any state to the next Lok Sabha. Swaraj already has the Vidisha constituency in Madhya Pradesh; Advani from Bhopal would have strengthened Plan B.
It is no secret that on their own hardly anyone from among the top ten or twelve BJP leaders (Arun Jaitley may be an exception) would have zeroed in on Modi as the party’s prime ministerial candidate, knowing his authoritarian ways. The Gujarat story is well-known, where Modi sidelined all possible rivals who could have replaced him. Who, after all, would like to see Modi emerge as the only hero?
Mind you, the RSS is using Modi as a Hindutva icon, not as some kind of development man who will make India shine. It is precisely because of the 2002 riots in Gujarat that he has become the chosen one. Did he not show how to put the minorities in their place? The Hindutva experiment in Gujarat’s laboratory was successful. In the interest of moving Hindutva forward, the RSS has decided to ignore that in Gujarat Modi had rendered the RSS, the VHP, the Bajrang Dal and its other outfits powerless.
As if the Advani kerfuffle wasn’t enough, Varanasi stalwart Murli Manohar Joshi being ordered to make way for ‘Har Har Modi’, Lalji Tandon being sent packing as Rajnath Singh wanted nothing less than the Lucknow seat and Jaswant Singh being denied the ticket for Barmer have all served to expose the faultlines.
Ticket distribution in all parties is the cause for heartburn, even rebellion. For every candidate selected, three or four claimants are disappointed. The situation becomes more acute in a party expected to emerge winner. To that extent, the BJP’s woes were expected. What was different was that senior leaders, who get to contest from where they wish to, were at the receiving end of decisions taken or not taken by the central election committee. Only two voices mattered: that of Rajnath Singh and Modi. They grabbed what they wanted and let the Devil take the hindmost.
In this scenario, what could second-rung leaders expect? Fiery sanyasin Uma Bharati has been sent off to contest from Jhansi, when she would have preferred Bhopal. The party could not annoy CM Shivraj Singh Chouhan, who did not want her in his face and on his turf.
The denial of ticket to seven-time MP Harin Pathak from Ahmedabad East was a story foretold. Even in 2009, Modi wanted to cut him out, but Rajnath Singh had intervened. His fault: he is an Advani loyalist. Pathak should count himself lucky. Remember his namesake Haren Pandya? He had audaciously refused to vacate his Ellisbridge assembly seat for Modi in 2001. Denied a ticket in 2002, he was a dead man by March 2003, shot mysteriously while on a morning walk.
Longtime BJP watcher Neena Vyas is a former associate editor of The Hindu
What is Neena Vyas trying to say (Huntsmen’s Chorus, Apr 7)? The BJP is messy with all this internal democracy. Look at the Congress, beautiful, unquestioned aristocracy.
Unlike Modi, Rahul never did grab power. He is doing a valiant job of supporting his party while all he stands for is all what his party is against.
Francis D’Souza, Delhi
What can DEFICITS do?
The economic balance does not require TAXES. The name TAXPAYERS will be scrapped and replaced by the term CITIZENS doing what they want to help the economy. The govt will take care of pumping money to make the economy hum. All commons will be funded by free money which makes free education, free infrastructure, free healthcare, free social security, free universal income, no toll roads, almost free monorail, low cost railways, roads and bridges etc. possible, together with well funded science and technology etc.
Here is an example of a modern monetary system.
Is the way the accounts balance right now. It is nothing but data = TRUTH. Cick on the preview to enlarge in another page. You see that there is NO TAX in the balance.
Anybody who knows the economy would be OK by me.Subsidies cost NOTHING to a money creator. All created rupees cost ZERO to produce. Let me start with the economic balance.
The balance for the economy is
FISCAL DEFICIT - NET IMPORT = NET PRIVATE SAVINGS which is proved by data at
Twitter / StephanieKelton: @gleesonjm Careful. Government… —twitter.com
Youcan see here that fiscal deficits are equal to private savings most of the time and become wealth. See the symmetry which shows the above equation in visual form.
Obviously it is stupid to minimize fiscal deficits! Chidambaram is very pleased to hold it down to 4.6%. Red govt and Blue private sector are equal and opposite at low trade. The plot shows red and blue at 10%. There is no reason it won't work at double or triple that.
DEFICITS are free money that can be used to grow the economy at 20% PLUS. Per year! Everything can be subsidized at ZERO cost. Deficit is created money at ZERO cost. Free universal income, free healthcare, free college, free metrorail (or almost, to prevent overuse) etc.
And I almost forgot! NO taxation! Fiscal deficits are the prime mover of the economy. They are called deficits to the govt but are in reality blessings to the people. I would like to rename it by a glorious name SUKHAADHARAM for happiness basis somewhat like BHUGOLA for geography, the naming convention adapted by the ancients. Also note no FDI is required. The soviet model will work fine.
The picture is at @gleesonjm Careful. Government deficits = Non-government surpluses to the penny. pic.twitter.com/mIvjkQ18Hh
Hello, did the EDITOR doze off. Outlook has put Fiction Article in Opinion Section.
rss has no idea what kind of a frankenstien it has created.
by the time it comes to its senses, it will be too late.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT