Thirty-one years ago, when ad-man Santosh Desai went to study at IIM Ahmedabad, he got quizzical reactions from people there. Studying management was an alien concept among Gujaratis—the only way to learn how to do ‘bijnis’ was by actually doing business. Few among the Gujarati business class had a clue about management education. Fewer believed that business could actually be taught. Despite India’s first IIM coming up there, studying ‘doing business’ in an institution was culturally detached from anything Gujarati.
In Narendra Modi’s vibrant Gujarat, the one thing that mattered most was business. It continues to be so. It is a cliche, but bears repeating—business runs in the blood of Gujaratis. With a business-minded Gujarati at the helm of India’s affairs, one has to see why ‘bijnis’ will occupy a greater share in the scheme of things. How will it affect governance in New Delhi? For answers, look no further than the zooming values of Gujarat-based companies in the stock market. They sense what a Modi victory will mean for business.
Across ages, Gujaratis have been known as India’s largest mercantile class that set up much of India’s industries. The first textile mill, the first polyester making facility and India’s largest milk cooperative all have had a very prominent Gujarati stamp. With Modi at the Centre, it is expected that Gujarati business, which has made the state one of the biggest business success stories in India, will come into greater national focus.
Gujarati business successes have come through family traditions and on-ground experience rather than higher education. For a true Gujarati, the time-tested formula was to get a BCom degree and then plunge into ‘dhanda’. True Gujaratis have accept this readily. “Education is not as valuable as it is in other states.... Education does not get the importance it needs even from the state government,” says senior journalist Aakar Patel
Unlike India’s other business community, the Marwaris, Gujaratis have been more of go-getters, taking risks and boldly entering uncharted territories. Take for instance Dhirubhai Ambani, who, in the land of Gandhi and cotton, introduced polyester as the poor man’s fabric. Or Karsanbhai Patel, who went a step further and started making synthetic detergent by hand, thereby merging Gandhian small-scale industry with modern chemistry. “More than others, Gujaratis have always been counter-intuitive businessmen. They tend to get into new businesses and try out new opportunities. For instance, the Adanis went into ports when no one was looking at it,” says author Harish Damodaran.
Unlike Marwaris, Gujaratis have been outward-looking, and have been the first among India’s trading communities to go beyond Indian shores, to East and South Africa, Burma and to the US to set up their business and networks.
So why is business so deeply rooted in Gujarati tradition? Experts say that Gujaratis’ business instinct resulted from the state’s geographical location—it has for centuries been a trading centre and an entry port for supplying India. Business historian Dwijendra Tripathy says, “With locational advantages of a long coastline, ports including Cambay and Surat—considered to be the best in India before the rise of Bombay—Gujarat is a virtual window to the outside world. Its rich hinterland and well-developed trade routes connect it to the rest of the subcontinent and beckoned its residents to profitable business opportunities.”
Commercial ethics is so pervasive in Gujarat that it drew in even non-mercantile groups. Business historian Raman Mahadevan says, “The strong mercantile tradition and business ethic rooted among Gujaratis, along with the ability to take advantage of opportunities in business makes for a success story.” Examples are aplenty. For instance, who ever thought that India can make a success of importing rough diamonds and become one of the world’s largest hubs of cutting and polishing them? The Surat diamond industry, one of the largest and most valued in the world, is almost entirely managed by Palanpuri Jains.
In many parts of India, business is still a last resort and an apologetic proposition. Except in Gujarat. “For Gujaratis, business, not education, is top on social acceptance. They are more comfortable with business and trading where they exchange assets and there is no time lag between investment and returns,” says Santosh Desai, CEO Future Brands.
Consider the long list of Gujarati firms (or those whose promoters are Gujaratis) that are stock market stars—Adani Enterprises, Alembic Pharma, Cadila Healthcare, Cipla, Glenmark, hdfc Bank, Kotak Mahindra Bank, Reliance Industries, Sun Pharma, Torrent Pharma, Wipro—the list rattles on.
Gujaratis are also better networked within their community than others. Patel-owned motels in the US, for instance, are a great example how Gujaratis have taken advantage of cheap land outside larger cities and created a chain of budget hotels on highways.
As the earlier Brahmins and Vaishyas have given way to Patidars or Patels who have taken centrestage among Gujarati businessmen, traditional businesses like textiles, chemicals and commodities trade have today given way to modern industries like petrochemicals, pharmaceuticals and manufacturing. Many have branched out to newer areas. As a result, some of the fastest growing industries are located in Gujarat. Land acquisition (a prickly issue nationally) has been (often controversially) tackled with speed. Who can forget how Modi found space to relocate the Tata Nano project?
One of the success formulas of PM-elect Narendra Modi too has been to package the Gujarat model of business-led development and present it to the world. A few years ago, his Vibrant Gujarat initiative attracted the biggest names in India Inc and has continued to be India’s biggest business showcase. His detractors say this is marketing led, pro-corporate hype that fills the coffers of the rich and ignores the poor.
The Gujarat model is partly responsible for giving Modi a convincing political mandate. The Modi administration is likely to cut-and-paste the formula of business-led growth nationally. This, they hope, will bring in prosperity and economic growth. Millions of Indians anxiously await those returns.
Ode To The West Wind
Truly, there is no end to Gujarati enterprise
Mitron: The Not-So-Small Club Of Gujaratis Who Fell Foul Of The Law
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
The Adanis and Ambanis are typical examples of how business can manipulate politicians to their own advantage - and NOT of entrepreneurship.
Ideally, they should find their names in the second list of financial thieves, alongwith Harshad Mehta or Ketan Desai.
JRD Tata tried to convince both father and daughter that business is a force for good.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT