Indian cricket is under siege from a conflict of ideologies, one that threatens to drive a stake into the heart of the game in the country. To understand it, rewind to the 50-over World Cup in the West Indies three years ago. India was knocked out in the league stage itself then, prompting no less than seven ex-Indian captains to come out suggesting a cut in endorsements by the players. The argument then—that commercial interests were distracting the Indian cricketers, impeding their performance on the field.
Three years on, things have changed dramatically. Commercial entities that were sponsors then have became stakeholders by buying teams in the Indian Premier League (IPL). The keys to the treasure of cricket—the players—have been handed over to them, to use at will. With just eight months to go for the World Cup (50-overs), Indian cricket seems to be in disarray. In the altered scenario, the players have no time to call their own. During the IPL, after finishing a match late at night, they had to go back and party. No doubt they were earning more, but at the expense of their freedom. It’s the nature of the beast—the corporate world wants to extract the maximum mileage out of the cricketers.
So when captain M.S. Dhoni says that the IPL parties were detrimental to the Indian team’s interests, we had Gavaskar, not surprisingly, countering: “Tell me one thing, there were no parties in the West Indies, were there? So how can you say that the team performed badly in the Caribbean because of parties in India.”
Yuvraj looking a bit thick in the middle, AFP (From Outlook, May 31)
Besides the obvious issue of commercial interests, the IPL impact is felt in several other ways. After India failed to win a single game in the second stage of the T20 World Cup last year, coach Gary Kirsten had asked the board to consider withholding the internationals from the IPL. After this year’s exit, he told three players that he, at 42, was fitter than them. The three were Yuvraj Singh, Rohit Sharma and Zaheer Khan. Obviously, the board could threaten the reluctant ones into following a strict fitness regimen. But, as an ex-India captain says, “it’s forfeited that duty in lieu of cash”.
This begs the question: shouldn’t 45 days of non-stop cricket have made the players fitter? Sports medicine expert Dr P.S.M. Chandran believes the IPL kept the players completely disoriented. “Essentially, it was because of the travel,” he told Outlook. “Your meal pattern changes, everything changes. For a sportsperson, it could be an exception for a day or two, not for 45 days.”
From his own experience, Bishan Singh Bedi says it’s easy to put on weight during a tour—which is what the IPL is, albeit an internal one. “There are so many opportunities—dinner invitations, parties. While playing also, you’re always eating. If you aren’t careful, you’ll become fat,” says Bedi. Dr Chandran agrees, saying that contrary to perception, the danger is greater in T20 cricket. “There are only 20 overs to play; the batsmen run less because there are more fours and sixes; for the same reason, the fielders also don’t burn so much energy.”
It’s imperative, thus, to work out more when playing T20 cricket. The IPL, though, never allowed the players the time. “You reach the hotel tired after the game at night, and then you go to the party and hang around a bit,” a player says. “Before you realise, it’s 4 am. You hit the sack and sleep into the afternoon. Then there will be either a flight to catch to the next venue or a sponsor commitment or nets. It’s easy to gain weight.”
There’s also a question mark on the team’s bench strength. Says Bedi, “India did well and became No. 1 in Tests because of players like Sachin, Dravid, Laxman, Sehwag, Kumble and Zaheer. But most of these seniors, who were grounded in Test cricket, will be gone in 2-3 years, and Indian cricket will be in trouble. If there was no money to be made from T20 cricket, it would have been called the chief evil besetting the game.”
Meanwhile, is the BCCI putting in any effort to mentor the players, counsel them on dealing with the sudden fame, money and, often, failures? Hardly. “It’s not giving them the ability to handle all this,” says Latika Khaneja, who manages some Test players. “By selling so much of their time, by subtly advising them to go to parties, the IPL is placing temptation before them.”
Gambhir fends off a rising Shaun Tait ball during the Oz match
Present BCCI president Shashank Manohar offers some hope, for as BCCI vice-president he had been the driving force when the board contemplated limiting player endorsements. Manohar is a traditionalist whose antipathy for both the IPL and Lalit Modi is well-known. However, money is a great persuader—BCCI insiders say Manohar will face stiff opposition if he tries to impose his beliefs too much on the IPL. Ex-BCCI president A.C. Muthiah is right when he says, “The BCCI doesn’t need this much money, but in its greed it has lost control over the game.”
Those who love the game are hoping the officials and committees will pause for a moment, give some thought and resolve to nurturing the sport.
I don’t know why, but I read good news in your story on how all the filthy millions flowing into cricket are ruining the game (Great Indian Beamer, May 31). The prospect of the BCCI (and the IPL) taking cricket down with it pleases me. Maybe it’ll allow more space for other sports in India. Santosh Gairola, Taiwan
How can we bring about a change in BCCI’s policies? Maybe marshal all our friends and bombard them with mails and smses, as politicians are bothered only by numbers. Ajeet, Bhagalpur
Ha, wishful thinking! No amount of soul-searching would do any good. The BCCI salivates at the smell of money, and is incorrigible. Which means we continue to go from one tournament to another, with the same fate. Rubal Chakravorty, Ranchi
I seriously suggest you start another magazine for cricket and spare readers like me the excessive orgy over the game on our airwaves, print space and tele-time. G.M. Kamei, on e-mail
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT