Trinamool's Telangana Turmoil
Mamata Banerjee found herself facing a rather tricky national political situation this week, which though does not directly involve her, nevertheless demanded a response from her, especially considering that her name has been coming up lately as among the possible contenders for the Prime Minister's post, post the Parliamentary elections later this year. First the Telangana issue forced her Trinamool Congress Party to take an out and out anti-division stance which, just before the Lok Sabha polls may alienate pro-separatist voters in her own state, Bengal. While Mamata has categorically ruled out the creation of a separate Gorkha state, the possibility, just before the Parliamentary polls, of an unrest erupting in the hills of North Bengal if agitators in Darjeeling decide to renew their demands post the creation of Telangana, is a development she does not want happening. So to have to spell it out once again just before the elections that the TMC is anti-division is not something that Mamata would have liked to do but had to do anyway as all political parties found themselves having to vote on the Telegana issue.
Mum's The Word for Mamata
If there were expectations also that the TMC chief and West Bengal chief minister, in her capacity as a possible contender for the top post in Central politics, would comment on Tamil Nadu chief minister Jayalalitha's announcement to release former prime minister Rajiv Gandhi's assassins, then Mamata has judiciously steered clear of any public response. While Mamata is known to be extremely fond of her former mentor Rajiv Gandhi and has time and again expressed her gratitude to him for providing her with the kind of backing she needed in her initial days in politics since the mid 1980s, her present equation with the Congress Party and given the on and off strained relationship she shares with Sonia and even Rahul to some extent, it is not surprising that she has exercised caution in reacting to the controversial decision by Jayalalitha which has of course subsequently been quashed by the Supreme Court. There is another reason why Mamata may have abstained from issuing a comment. It must be remembered that she has been speaking about that alternative non-Congress, non-BJP Third Federal Front which, though rules out her sworn enemy the CPI-M, certainly does not rule out Jayalalitha and her AIADMK.
B for Bhendetta (and Budget)
Former West Bengal finance minister Asim Dasgupta is on sweet-revenge mode. Dasgupta, who has the distinction of being the longest-serving finance minister of the state, has, for years, faced tough questions, not to mention severe criticism, after presenting his Budget (especially the clauses about zero-deficit) year after year from the Opposition parties. Now the MIT alumnus is getting his own back. Every year, since the TMC came to power in 2011, he has held a post-budget press conference to deconstruct (read demolish) the claims and promises made by the incumbent TMC finance minister Amit Mitra in his Budget. This year, for instance, after Mitra presented his Budget for the Financial Year 2014-2015, Dasgupta called a press conference to question the "misleading and non-transparent" claims and promises. Mitra's claim that the state would achieve a 9.58 per cent growth, for instance, was severely shot down by Dasgupta, who demanded that Mitra delineate exactly how he proposed to achieve this figure. Mitra however refused to respond to the questions, stating that he had already made his point during the budget speech.
In Two Minds
Calcuttans had packed away the woollens. By the end of the first week of February, the cuckoo started singing their distant song announcing the advent of spring. But it was suddenly so hot that it seemed like summer had arrived. The swimsuits and shorts came out. Then on the night of February 15, like a bolt from the blue, we heard the sound of thunder. And then came the rain, bringing back the biting chill. The confusion evidently had created havoc in the lives of some people. Garment hawkers of Gariahat, Calcutta's busy market complex, for instance, bitterly complained about having returned the winter fare to the go-downs and brought in the summer fare. "It's so cold, the thin dresses and shirts are not selling at all," said a hawker. "Daily sales are important for us so we can't afford to lose money like this. Looks like we have to return these and get the shawls and sweaters back." Indeed according to the Meteorological office the cold will continue for at least another few days. In case you're wondering, yes, the monkey caps and toe socks are back too.
Wisdom on Wheels
Written behind an auto: "Hingsha korchish kor...tor shraapey amar bor" (Go ahead and envy me...it's a blessing in disguise...you see)
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
Mamata Banerjee shows what a fearless and a principled leader she is!!!
Nancy Powell, who it seems, has no job other than meeting Indian leaders and their secretaries, wanted to meet Mamata. The news leaked and some muslim maulana warned Mamata about meeting the devil. Guess what?? Mamata cancels her appt with Nancy Powell.
Now let us all remember that Mamata is a succular leader. Add to that, the woman is brave.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT