When Yuan Speaks To Rupee
For all the adversarial prancing on geopolitical matters, the full-body tango between the world’s two fastest-growing economies comes as a near-paradox. As India and China put up shared concerns at global negotiations and strive to accelerate booming bilateral trade volumes, some see it as a sign of hope—common economic interests are known to bridge gaps. After all, the two countries have often been placed on the same side of the table, whether at WTO talks or in the run-up to climate change negotiations.
Rapid bilateral trade growth—from $15 billion to $50 billion in the last five years—is natural for two supercharged economies. But for the contraction in domestic demand, bilateral trade this year was expected to touch $60 billion. From buses, trucks and auto parts to computer hardware, electronic goods and toys, our markets are flooded with both high-end and low-priced products from China. Chinese turbines and equipment are ubiquitous in the power sector; 80 per cent of the telecom equipment is being sourced from China; rigs for oil exploration; pipeline and infrastructure projects...the list is endless.
That view stems from a growing and uncomfortable sense that China is placing high barriers to contain India’s exports. Recent trade data for January-August 2009 shows that while India’s global exports dipped around 28 per cent, those to China have fallen by 48 per cent. On the other hand, Chinese exports to India have slipped by just 14 per cent. From a position of $1.75 billion trade surplus in 2004, India’s balance of trade with China reached a deficit of $11 billion in 2008. Some liken it to India’s pre-independence trade ties with Britain.
Speak to customers of Chinese products and a different picture emerges. Despite some concerns on quality, Chinese equipment suppliers seem to increasingly find takers in India. “The tilt in China’s favour has happened due to its manufacturing strength and competitive pricing. I find no issues with their quality,” asserts Suresh Deora, honorary general secretary of India-China Chamber of Commerce and Industry. Deora’s company, Bombay Ampoules and Vials, regularly imports Chinese pharma packaging material.
Clearly, many see this engagement as a necessary (and welcome) outcome for a economy that needs to fuel the growth engine. Even so, the government strives to downplay the Chinese impact. Union power secretary H.S. Brahma clarifies that while Chinese equipment and technological support has helped fill the gap in domestic manufacturing capacity, “their role is supplementary. We do not see their role beyond a point—at the most another three years, after which we will be able to meet all our domestic power equipment demand.”
Experts also point to the bigger picture. “While bilateral economic relations have been showing tremendous dynamism, it is very asymmetric. Not only is the trade skewed in China’s favour, the investment relations on both sides are very weak,” argues Ram Upendra Das, fellow at think-tank RIS. For instance, between 2000 and March 2009, Chinese investment in India was a mere 0.01 per cent of the total $84.4 billion FDI inflow. There are around 50 Chinese companies operating in India engaged in manufacturing, infrastructure and IT sectors.
Indeed, an air of uncertainty persists on the future of India-China trade. Is the talk of a Free Trade Agreement (FTA), a possibility discussed yet again during PM Manmohan Singh’s meeting with his Chinese counterpart Wen Jiabao on the sidelines of the ASEAN summit in Thailand, ever going to become a reality? Khullar is emphatic: “There is no question of an FTA with China at this juncture.”
A task force set up in 2005 to study the implications of an FTA with China—involving India lowering its tariffs—is still to submit its report. Official sources admit to a clear divide in the government on the FTA issue with those opposing, including industry, clearly prevailing. Pointing to the flood of Chinese products in Indian markets and the non-tariff barriers faced by Indian firms in China, official sources point out that it only justifies the opposition to the FTA proposal right from 2004.
As a trade expert puts it, “The entire range of Chinese cards are stacked against us. Chinese are strategically thinking of areas where they can capture our expertise.” After all, aren’t the two countries competing for a share in the global markets, be it for equity, oil, textiles or other manufactured goods? Whether or not industry likes it, suddenly business between the two countries has been invested with a new sharpness.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT