So Sri Lanka didn’t win the World Cup. Again. We made it to the finish-line, before being tripped up by the wicketkeeper. Again. Two weeks have passed and it appears that the hangover has finally lifted. On the bright side, two consecutive finals prove, at the very least, that 1996 wasn’t a fluke. On the dark side, this is the last stand for many of our 2011 alumni. By the time another World Cup rolls by, Chamara Silva will be our most experienced batsman and Nuwan Kulasekera will be our main strike bowler. Yikes.
Sri Lankan fans have responded with quiet dignity. Many accept that we were beaten by a greater force, that our multi-pronged bowling attack, marred by injury, soggy conditions and miscued selections, were unable to tame the best batting line-up in the world.
There have been no prolonged sulks in the press as per the western media. No subcontinental-style hurling of pebbles at cricketers’ homes. For a nation not averse to irrational barbarism, the reaction has been surprisingly measured. Effigies have escaped the flame. Conspiracy theories have been discussed and then discarded. Trade in scapegoats has been low. Instead, Sri Lankan cricket has gone and done something radical. It has typed up its resignation and handed it in.
First Murali went. Then Malinga swore he wasn’t coming back. Sanga chucked it in, closely followed by Mahela. Then there were the selectors, and then the coach. According to Andrew Fernando’s spoof Cricinfo article, ‘Sri Lankan Team Bus Driver Resigns’, “En masses resignations are generally the best way to deal with losing a World Cup final.” And in the current climate, who can really argue?
That’s why I have half a mind to leap aboard this crowded bandwagon. To toss my white envelope into the ring. And announce my resignation from writing about cricket. And to serve notice on my days of being a fan. Now this probably seems a tad drastic. The petulant reaction of someone choking on sour grapes. Surely, I can be less of a drama queen. Chuck an effigy of Kulasekera on the barbie, pick fights with Indians in cricket chatrooms, spread a few malicious match-fixing rumours. Curse the Cricket Gods and move on.
If we use the last 18 months as a barometer, there will be 181 Test matches and 774 one-dayers to look forward to from now till the next World Cup. Assuming Sri Lanka features in 10 per cent of these games, that’s approximately 174 days of me sitting in front of a TV watching leather hit willow. There was a time when this prospect would’ve filled me with glee. No longer.
We used to thrill at the thought of Viv Richards squaring up to Dennis Lillee. At the sight of Gavaskar’s elegance defusing Botham’s belligerence. And our hearts would melt when Aravinda de Silva hooked Imran to the fence.
It could be the mistaken notion that the past is superior to the world we now inhabit. That the gentlemen of yesteryear were somehow purer cricketers than today’s mercenaries. That the bombast of T20 has robbed cricket of its artistry. And that the vast sums of money riding on each game has stripped it of its romance. But this is neither accurate nor honest. The reason we don’t look forward to the battles between Kallis, Ponting, Sachin and Gayle has little to do with talent or sentiment. It’s quite simply because we’ve just seen them play each other last Tuesday. And the Wednesday before. And if we stick around, we may get to see them face off again tomorrow after lunch.
Fact 1: There’s too much darn cricket on. Fact 2: Any commodity experiencing an excess of supply will lose its value. The accountants will no doubt disagree. As the Cowboys and the Indians at the IPL play to packed houses each night, it’s evident that the game’s worth more than it’s ever been. But for true cricket fans, not everything is measured in rupees and cheerleaders.
Back in the day, a Test series was met with excitement and anticipation. Especially amongst us Sri Lankans. Back then, the world of cricket was smaller. It was just six Test playing giants and us. England, India, Australia, Pakistan, New Zealand and the Windies would rotate the strike, take turns granting us matches and use us as punching bags. But we didn’t care. In fact, we’d look forward to our annual Test series as a rugby fan would the next All Blacks game.
These days there’s no such thing as a cricket season, unless you’re referring to the period between January 1 and December 31. The game is spread thinly across three very different formats. And the calendar is now cluttered with as many meaningless fixtures as the English Premier League.
At the risk of blaspheming, let me state that for all its hype and star-filled dramas, the EPL dishes out very few surprises. Four clubs swap places at the top, while the rest make up the numbers. As a Newcastle fan, I console myself with the odd upset, though after Andy Carroll’s defection, that looks about as likely as Wigan playing Champions League.
Next month, the West Indies play Pakistan. Once upon a time, we would’ve rubbed our palms and licked our lips at the prospect of Imran and Wasim charging in at Greenidge and Haynes. Yet, today, the encounter has all the fascination of a Blackburn-Blackpool fixture.
It’s all about context. At a time when commentators were heralding the death of one-day cricket, the World Cup proved that there was still life in the old format. There were plenty of nail-biters, many of which featured England. Each game had a meaning, a subtext and a reason for being. Something which a 7-game series between New Zealand and Zimbabwe may lack. While the World Cup final had most of us riveted, can the same be said for the last 50 Sri Lanka-India games, which probably took place in as many weeks? If we keep repeating the same battles and lowering the stakes, cricket will be shorn of its meaning. And I may not be the only one tendering my resignation.
Perhaps my desire to resign is a knee-jerk reaction to the changing landscape, borne of my revulsion to T20. As was recently pointed out to me, if a Test is a classical text and a one-dayer is a racy thriller, then T20 is a glossy porn rag. Maybe my mistake was in trying to embrace all three formats at once. Like trying to cram Herodotus, Ian Fleming and Larry Flynt into one anthology. Like trying to stuff an entire buffet onto one plate. Ultimately, the fragmentation of cricket is an inevitable evolution. And to be a fan it is no longer necessary to watch every game and follow every format. It’s now up to us to choose how we consume our cricket and to select which matches we assign meaning to.
So rather than resigning from the game, maybe it’s wiser to resign yourself to what the cricket has become. To take from it what you will. And to discard the rest.
Karunatilaka is the author of Chinaman: The Legend of Pradeep Mathew, a novel about Sri Lanka and cricket. Waterstones UK listed it as one of the top debuts of 2011.
Shehan Karunatilaka’s piece on T20 was classily written (A Porn Called T20, May 2). When the thing we have loved so much has transmogrified itself into this all-encompassing omniplaying monster—obviously, we have no choice, but to make a choice.
Khaja M., Bangalore
Test cricket, which was a living and breathing ‘slow food movement’, and a Zen-like soothing experience, has been shelved off permanently.
Anoop Hosmath, Mysore
Cricket is an anachronism (A Porn Called T-20, May 2). Conveived as a leisure activity for Victorian gentlemen, the real challenge cricket faces is to refashion itself to meet the demands of a changing world. Cricket, unlike football, is not an inclusive game—it demands time even to watch. The swansong of old-world cricket may well turn out to be its saving grace.
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
Classily written - This guy has the class of his fellow country man Mahela. (Or is it really you, Mahela??) What can one disagree with this article?
When the thing that we have loved so much has transmogrified (yes, i checked - its a real word!!) itself into this all encompassing (obviously excluding Pakistan) omniplaying monster, obviously, we have no choice but to make a choice!!
When you go to a buffet you dont eat everything on offer! Take what you like, leave the rest.
Well crafted article...so true what the glitterati/filmi drama that the IPL has become
Cricket is an anachronism . Conceived as a leasure activity for Victorian gentlemen , it spread piggyback on the British empire to the colonies .It has struggled for the better part of the 20th century , and certainly in the present one, against the intrusion of professionals and commercialisation . It is one of the not-so-tacit assumptions of the advocates of cricket that it is not about money , or even about winning : it is about playing the game . Cricket , the myth says , carries over the values of the English public school into the playing fields of the colonies . Cricket has thus suffered a perpetual identity crisis. Is cricket a way of life or simply another game?The problems created by the maverick intervention of Kerry Packer ; the controversy created by betting and the taint put on the game by match-fixing are all symptoms of that crisis.
The real challenge before cricket is its ability to refashion itself to meet the demands of a new and changing world . There are signs- the IPL players' auctionis one of them - that cricket can change to survive instead of bemoaning that time is out of joint! Cricket , unlike football , is not an inclusive game- it demands time even to watch .It is significant that none of the present superpowers of the 21st century play cricket or even have the remotest interest in the game ; the swansong of old-world cricket may well turn out to be the saving grace !
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT