As if the angst, outrage, and pain, generated by each of these event were not enough, India’s political leadership contributed their share to each tragedy by coming out with a set of comments, each one more offensive than the one that preceded it. We have by now had numerous cases of “sajano ghotona.” We experienced disbelief when we heard Abhijit Mukherjee, son of the president of India, who made national headlines (the only time in his career, so far) for his idiotic remark delivered with aplomb that the women activists protesting the Dec 16 crime were “dented and painted”. While no one knows what he meant, this much was clear that the honourable MP did not have much regard for those who braved water canons and police batons for days during Delhi’s freezing winter. RSS chief Mohan Bhagvat’s remark was far more insidious in the spurious distinction he drew between “Bharat” and “India” observing that the former was free of rape.
Had Bhagvat done some basic homework, he would have known how wrong headed his statement was. One need not be a cynic to think that India’s political leadership is often intentionally sensationalist. For ballots and bytes, they will not shy away from making comments that can foment violence. The Aug 22 rape of the young Mumbaikar has already been seized upon as an opportune moment for the Shiv Sena and the MNS to blow on their usual "Bangladeshi migrants" and anti-north Indian horn.
As I read the news of the young woman and her friend’s trip in the early evening to the abandoned Shakti Mills complex to catch the special evening light in which to photograph the dilapidated factory, I could not help asking myself which inch of India is safe for women. Is there even an iota of truth in Bhagvat’s projection of the places he designated as “Bharat”? Then why do we have a Kamduni? Why did 16 year-old Rajib Das have to die in order to save his sister who was being sprinkled with alcohol and molested only 100 m away from the district magistrate’s bungalow in Barasat? Perhaps Barasat is not “Bharat” enough? What then of the numerous women in Sutia or the female police official in Jharkhand? The list can be extended ad nauseam.
The truth is that the safety of women is under threat everywhere in India. It is under attack in militarised zones such as Kashmir and the northeast, it is under threat in villages, in highly literate states such as Kerala, in states with women leaders such as Tamil Nadu and West Bengal. It is under threat in many homes and in many schools, in public toilets and train stations, on brightly lit roads of metros such as Mumbai Kolkata, and Delhi as well as in the dark, country roads of UP, Jharkhand, West Bengal, and Assam. I am not interested in making a tally of the levels of atrocity suffered by Dalit women versus upper caste women, nor am I invested in making arbitrary distinctions like Bhagvat on Bharat vs India. I am still surprised that such statements are regarded as important and worthy of thought by a well-known social scientist like Ashis Nandy. Equally, I am not interested in whether item numbers and Bollywood films contribute to these crimes or if it is the unfortunate underbelly of economic globalisation. Most of all, I am not interested in the question of whether these crimes have gone up in recent years or if this is simply a function of widespread media reportage. I am sure that there is some truth in many of these propositions.
I was reminded with a sense of sadness that in Bengali we call that time of day when the young woman was attacked in Mumbai “godhuli”, a time when the dust from the hooves of cows returning from the fields creates a storm that renders the light of the setting sun even more beautiful. She wanted to catch that light of the setting sun, but was attacked, abused, raped, and brutalized by five men. She was an intern who is still determined to return to that same spot to complete her assignment. I laud her courage and her spirit and am it takes me back to a utopian thought I have nurtured for many months now. Utopian because it is unlikely to ever become reality. But which sensitive human being among us is not thinking today about how to make this country safe for women? This is by no means to take an extreme position that regards all men with suspicion or to say that the rape is a fantasy for all men. Not at all.
It is however true that in India these incidents are still treated as “women’s” rather than everyone’s issue. Haven’t we had enough of candle-light vigils and street protests? The truth is that nothing happens in India unless we can think of some way to impact electoral results. Most politicians, and they are the ones who hold our police and bureaucracy in an iron fist (the case of Durga Shakti Nagpal or Damayanti Sen are two important examples), will not give two hoots about women’s safety unless there was some way in which this could upset their numbers at the polls. I think that women in India have a huge challenge facing them. Can they overcome the numerous divisions that will never go away—divisions of caste, religion, region, and community—and come together as a bloc that will demand that every political party should have a well worked out agenda for women before the 2014 elections? Can they unite themselves despite their diversity, converting difference into a strength and demand public debates among parties about proposed plans for making fast track courts work, making charge-sheet processes actually happen, about counselling centres, lights, and emergency phones in villages and cities? Only a concerted front that wields considerable power at the polls can bring about significant changes in our legal and judicial system, whose proceduralism is deeply wanting in imagination.
If the fracas over the women’s bill was anything to go by, it is clear as day that there is no such entity called “Indian women.” There is Hindu, Muslim, Dalit, Naga, Marathi, Himachali, and countless others. Can we imagine a women’s movement in this country that does not deny these divisions but is able to successfully posit an overarching identity called “Indian women” that supersedes these discrete ones? It is time for “Indian” women to step out as a bloc that demands certain rights for the entirety of the female population in the country. Failure to deliver should hold the threat of being toppled at the polls. This is my dream. And reading about Nirbhaya or the young women of Kamduni, or the young photojournalist in Mumbai gives me the courage to express it in words.
Rochona Majumdar is Associate Professor, University of Chicago
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
D 2 Ramki sir
"The people of each gender no doubt have difficulty to understand each other and get into fights which is all understandable but the dependence of each other is so much that arm chair feminists cannot find an alternative sitting in a room".
Sir, I agree.
The last para of your post, which obviousely has political tune.
But it is because the Misogynist will fight tooth and nail to it.
Rochona >> It is time for “Indian” women to step out as a bloc that demands certain rights for the entirety of the female population in the country. Failure to deliver should hold the threat of being toppled at the polls. This is my dream. And reading about Nirbhaya or the young women of Kamduni, or the young photojournalist in Mumbai gives me the courage to express it in words.
Every citizen of any gender has the right to dream anything and articulate it but to get them taken seriously, we need something called Plain commonsense.
If this person rochona thinks that all the 600 million indian women have the same needs and have the same friends and enemies,she is utterly mistaken .
Contrary to what feminazis and politically correct intellectuals preach - the world in reality is not a male-female warfield. So many men works his livelihood to feed, clothe and educate a female (his mother,his spouse/partner, his daughter). So many women does the same to coexist-live share with her (mother/in law, partner, son )
The people of each gender no doubt have difficulty to understand each other and get into fights which is all understandable but the dependence of each other is so much that arm chair feminists cannot find an alternative sitting in a room.
Rochona, if you want a woman votebank, you should step out and first ask our resident queen - saint sonia as to why she is grooming her son (pappu) as her successor than her daughter (priyanka).
9 D Dear Rochana Ji
Take Tearful Onions everyday, so that more males will sympathise with your bull shit
Dear Rochona Ji,
You have to also encounter the delightfully named Misogynist and check out how single-minded he is in his campaign. Please learn that from him and establish your Durga Shaksthi Sena ;-) May Amba be with you.
By D9 reply Misogynist has proved he is sensitive
had he been insensitive as alleged by you he mightnot have
There are ewnough doctors in US unlyk India.
Pl visit one and revert back
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT