They were taunted, they were ridiculed, they were dismissed and they were harassed. And, even as a nation sat transfixed, trying to absorb the sheer audacity of their ambition and the magnitude of their achievement, the political establishment was quick to dismiss the AAP as unsustainable. Politician after politician refused to acknowledge the path breaking significance of Delhi results beyond the cursory congratulation. Here are the five lessons from Delhi that the political class was too scared to admit.
First, you don't need huge amounts of money to fight elections and it is possible to be clean in politics. AAP raised a limited amount of money, raised it in a transparent manner and spent it effectively within the legally mandated limit (Full disclaimer: I contributed). The promise of clean politics attracts thousands of volunteers and millions of voters and clean politics begins with clean money. That's a frightening thought for the established parties who have created a mythology around money and muscle power to justify the intricate web of corruption.
Two, the people's disgust with this coalition of the corrupt has reached epidemic proportions. They are sick and tired of the smug fat cats – politicians, bureaucrats, crony capitalists, criminals – indulging in VIPgiri, secure in the knowledge that by protecting each other, and by controlling the levers of power, they can get away with anything. It was this smugness that made them taunt the India Against Corruption volunteers to fight elections. Well, unknown and faceless individuals, fuelled by this disgust, took the challenge, formed the AAP and humbled the mighty and the powerful.
Three, we the people of India, in whose name you sit in the corridors of power, want to be involved in the process of governing our country. We want to be consulted in the framing of laws. The Jan Lokpal bill draft framed by Team Anna may have been flawed, but it was they who held over 350 town hall meetings and took feedback from the people; not the government. We want our voices to be heard in how the money is being spent. One of the key highlights of the AAP strategy was to involve the people in the drafting of its manifesto and the promise of decentralization of power to the people. We want accountability from our institutions and we don't want to be dismissed with “laws are not made on the streets”.
Four, the combination of TV, mobile and the internet has dramatically expanded the radius of communication. The exploits of AAP is being followed by all parts of the country. When they go beyond Delhi, they will not start from scratch. They already have the national mind space and it will not take them years to set up a nation wide organization. The establishment is still in a state of shock, trying to comprehend how AAP could achieve so much in one year. They should be scared of how much more it can achieve pretty soon.
Five, it's possible to be electorally successful without indulging in identity politics. When AAP was formed, politicians who still drive by looking in the rear view mirror, sneered, “What's their vote base?” Well, here is breaking news for them – issues of governance, corruption, people power and building a fair and prosperous society has no caste, religion or region. It may come as a shock to established political parties, but Indians have far more in common than what divides them. They share potholed roads, electricity cuts, corrupt officials, stagnating salaries, capability to work hard, a desire to live with honesty and dignity – and they share a hope of a better future for their children.
AAP is not a perfect party and one may not agree with their positions on various issues. The AAP experiment may still fail. But if it has happened once, it will happen again. And again. The established political parties will do well to learn the lessons and apply them. If they do not, may they rest in peace.
Interesting series of comments in which every one, barring Ramki, seems to believe that the advent of the AAP is the best thing that has happened to politics since the concept of democracy.
Yes the AAP has demolished some of the established givens of Indian politics and has tapped into the groundswell of anger at the entire political class. However, it has done nothing so far, besides get a large number of votes. Indeed it has balked at the very first obstacle - forming a government and demonstrating that it can deliver what it has promised.
Without anything to show on their record, the AAP is now talking big about going global. OK not global but pan-India. Kejriwal defeated Dikshit by 20000+ votes and there is talk of Kumar Vishwas doing the same to Nonsense in Amethi and Mukul Sinha (backed by AAP) to NaMo. Wishful thinking. AAP lost heavily in semi-rural areas with concentrations of particular communities eg. Jats and Gujjars. According to Daily Bhaskar <daily.bhaskar.com/article/ELEC-DEL-20-constituencies-in-delhi-still-weigh-caste-party-loyalty-before-casting-their--4434038-NO.html > 20 constituencies are caste dominated, but it names only 14, 7 Jat dominated and another 7 by Gujjars. Of these 14, the BJP won 11 and the AAP, INC and an Independent one each. The AAP victory over the BJP was by 777 votes. AAP was second in only 6 constituencies, the margin of defeat ranging from 2414 to 25826. that means it came third or lower in 7 out of 14 constituencies. Is this a pointer to what would happen if AAP ventured out of its home turf? I don't know.
Vikas Kalra >> Would fellow commentators who are not from Delhi like to share how people in their cities are looking at this new phenomenon?
Consider a Place like Chennai, in South India. The people of TamilNadu want strong governance , law and order, something which current CM (Jayalalitha) is offering. And the people want development, meaning water supply (desal plants, riverwater linking) and power supply assured (Koodankulam power plant etc). They want a government that would give a fitting reply to Sri Lanka which has been mistreating its tamil minorities for decades
The current manifesto of AAP does not seem to address these concerns. Why would they even want to consider AAP? Its leader was opposing nuclear power plant, so why would people be interested?
Likewise, I dont see AAP getting traction in Gujarat or West Bengal. What about a state like Chattisgarh , which would be the real state where the likes of AAP need to demonstrate. Will AAP leaders be even able to campaign in the hilly and forested terrain of the state and brave naxals? I doubt.
AAP and its supporters should understand that political parties are not fast food items to be cooked in short period. A national political party is built over 3-4 general elections. If AAP is not prepared for long haul as a responsible opposition party,the party will not survive
The BIGGEST LOSER FROM THE AAP REVOLUTION IS...... .NOT CONGRESS, NOT BJP BUT BSP. And Not a single individual here or in Media is talking about this. Why?
Read this :
Conclusion - We do need a Pro dalit party in India as part of democracy, but such a party must also involve other non dalits and their governance concerns. And Reservation is just one of the many roads to achieve equal development of all social segments, it is not the DESTINATION itself. Hope Mayawathiji reads this and makes the course correction.
A balanced and positive commentary.
On TV talk shows people have tried to dismiss the AAP experiment as particularly Delhi centric. They draw parallels from Anna Hazare's movement which drew a lot of support in Delhi but failed in other cities. The logic is that by the same token AAP will also fail once it steps out of Delhi.
In media too I have seen few pieces on sustainability of the experiment outside Delhi.
Would fellow commentators who are not from Delhi like to share how people in their cities are looking at this new phenomenon?
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT