October and November have been the months of big-ticket items which we’ve been told to be proud of. While one of these, a mission to Mars, is simply out of this world, the other is not quite so. The proposed statue of Vallabhbhai Jhaverbhai Patel will be the tallest in this world. At 182 metres, this Statue of Unity will be able to look down upon the Statue of Liberty, standing at a mere 93 metres. Calls for unity have always cast a long shadow on liberty. Nothing exceptional there. This latter source of ‘national’ pride will, however, be built by a non-swadeshi consortium—muscular MNCs from the US and Australia. The project cost: Rs 2,500 crore.
The primary legatee of Patel’s political stature was the Indian National Congress. But ever since the Panditain split the party in 1967, the successor party has been very selective about its pantheon: the political legacies of many erstwhile Congressite stalwarts with the wrong surnames have gone largely unclaimed, till Narendrabhai really upped the ante by trying to stand on Vallabhbhai’s shoulders.
Not so long ago, statues of a different kind were the talk of the town. They too were very costly, but they were numerous and the project did not seem to be particularly timed to serve some greater purpose for Mayawati, the chief patron. When she got the statues built, including infamously, a few of her own, the chattering classes who have long checked out of government hospitals and schools suddenly became acutely interested in how the money being spent on this project would have otherwise done so much good for Uttar Pradesh. Many reams of newsprint and many hours of prime-time television were devoted to the absence of proper sanitation facilities, the high maternal mortality rate and other such sad things in UP. The shabby shape of health and public infrastructure in the state was not new. What was new was the acute sense of empathy and concern for these timeless problems. What was crucial was the time when the concern came forth. The silence of those sectors of society and media, when it comes to the Statue of Unity, is deafening. It was even more deafening in 2010, when Narendrabhai first announced the project. Between then and now, the Indira Congress-ncp government has announced a grandiose Shivaji statue project in Maharashtra. But the light of scrutiny about the ‘misuse’ of public funds falls disproportionately on mass leaders of certain predictable caste backgrounds. Casteism is unconstitutional but casteism under the cover of public interest is not.
The minimal middle-class grumblings that have, to be sure, emerged to the Vallabhbhai statue project are more a reflection of the opposition to Narendrabhai’s rising stature as a pretender to Vallabhbhai’s legacy. This opposition, by its very nature, is narrowly partisan and essentially anti-Modi. This is in sharp contrast to the nearly across-the-board condemnation Mayawati’s Ambedkar Memorial project received from these very classes.
What is Mayawati’s Ambedkar Memorial project anyways? The recent focus on Vallabhbhai by way of Narendrabhai has provided an opportunity for many Indians to get reinformed about every small detail of the long-dead Iron Man’s life. The audience has had its fill of ‘its’ national greatness that it ought not to forget, not after the statue. But beyond Mayawati and Ambedkar, do they know even the names of the other people whose statues were put up at the Ambedkar Memorial? Who was Shree Narayanaguru? Why do they not know? Why do we know more about certain things vis-a-vis certain other things?
Vallabhbhai has been credited with the process of ‘reuniting’ India by forcing the lands of 500-plus princely states into the newly formed Union of India. For many, the unity of the lives of people is the unity that matters. The unity that Ambedkar envisaged. It is yet to be achieved. It is that unmet dream that makes him stand out amongst the leaders whose stature, post-partition, has only grown and grown, largely without state patronage.
When the powerful or pretenders to power want to thrust forward, they often need vivid inspirations, real or imagined, preferably larger than life, to sustain the tempo. Figures from the past prop up the present and vice versa. In an environment of power politics obsessed with projecting and executing ‘manly’ solutions for a ‘chaotic’ and disobedient subcontinent (my extra-judicial killing is more patriotic than yours), the need for a grand something that brings together the republic, the phallic and the symbolic has been quite acute. It is even overdue, some may say. The invocation of ‘unity’ as a counterweight to insurgent liberty is not new.
(Garga Chatterjee is a brain scientist at MIT.)
Apropos Garga Chatterjee’s piece Mine is Bigger (Dec 9), Mayawati got a clear mandate in 2007, she ruined her chance and the people threw her out, that’s all. Please do not descend on this controversy from great heights with your wisdom and inject your caste analysis. We have enough of this type of paralysis.
@ Ashutosh Kaul -"While he is shooting breeze at MIT , he might want to look up a place called Mount Rushmore in South Dakota. He might get some idea about what this issue is all about."
And, if he is too busy with his cerebral research to travel to Mt Rushmore, he can take a quick break to Washington DC and visit the Lincoln memorial.
Outlook standards are well known but the worrying thing here is what MIT is coming to? A brain scientist that does not have enough grey matter to find the difference between ethically; morally and sculpturally bad self statues by dozens ( & about 400 elephants) and a proposed national monument for a national hero ? Honestly is this writer really at MIT? Hope it is just as a student and not as a member of the faculty ; where he can damage a lot of young minds. While he is shooting breeze at MIT , he might want to look up a place called Mount Rushmore in South Dakota. He might get some idea about what this issue is all about.
Another write sells his soul to the dynasty party for a few extra bucks. Senseless article. The election results should be a tight slap on faces of the paid media who try to fool the public.
history was created, ever heard of first female teacher of nation? thanks to Mayawati!
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT