Tarun Tejpal was my deputy at Outlook for nearly six years. Professionally, his contribution to the magazine was immense. A few years down, he brought in Shoma Chaudhury. Last week, on a frenzied Arnab Goswami programme, I was shouted down because I had the temerity to say “I like Tarun”. All hell broke loose. When I tried to read an SMS Tarun had sent me earlier in the day, the outrage intensified. I was lucky to escape in one piece.
To say I do not endorse Tarun’s conduct would make me sound like a lunatic. How can I, even tangentially, defend sexual molestation? Tarun has committed a horrific blunder and compounded it with clumsy efforts to vilify the victim. Atonement is not a personal matter when the charge is attempt to rape. With the start of the legal process, a quick court verdict should conclude matters. Some of Tarun’s teammates still in Outlook say that the otherwise comradely colleague is a split personality. Whatever, this is no time for Freudian analysis.
Two other critical issues have been thrown up. Anyone who is familiar with my writings will testify that for the past 40 years I have been arguing for more transparency and accountability in the profession. We cannot preach to the whole world on ethics, morality, openness and abuse of power, while we merrily breach the code we preach. We folks on the media pulpit are pulling skeletons out of other people’s cupboards. What about the skeletons in our own cupboard?
The abuse of power in the media, especially in the higher echelons, is rampant. Editors sexually exploit and harass trainees and junior staff with a crudity which is unbelievably cynical. The threat is always the same: if the girl ‘cooperates’, she not only keeps her job but enjoys rapid promotion. If she doesn’t, she is shown the door. It is the worst kept secret in our profession but it dare not speak its name. Some of the biggest luminaries in Indian journalism stand accused. Who they are is known both inside and outside the trade. The shameful silence needs to be broken.
Another silver lining. The new Indian working woman has arrived. She is much more confident, assertive and more aware of her rights. Moreover, she is prepared to fight for them. Predator editors better watch out. It is not going to be so easy to get away with ‘lapses’ either in or outside the lift.
From one abuse of power to another. And this one is much more sinister. The alleged Narendra Modi-masterminded Snoopgate may have disappeared from page 1, and suspended IAS officer Pradeep Sharma’s contention that he is being hounded because of a sex CD could be false. Nevertheless, the circumstances of the state-organised surveillance on a woman architect give the game away.
When the scandal first broke, a rookie reporter could have seen through it. If hell hath no fury like a woman spurned, the same could be true for Modi too. Whatever the reason, the object of Narendrabhai’s affection decided to break the relationship after having milked it. From what we know of our likely PM, he does not forget or forgive easily. Consequently, all three wings of the state’s intelligence unit were pressed into service.
The letter from the lady’s father seems to be part of a damage limitation exercise. Alas, it cuts no ice and neither does the one which mysteriously popped up at the National Commission for Women. Even a cursory reading of the transcripts shows the surveillance was not taken to ‘protect’ her but to keep Mr Modi informed about who she meets and which ice-cream she and her male friend prefer.
A question to ponder: Mr Modi is long estranged from his wife. He could be called a bachelor. Were he to enter into an open relationship, would he be committing a crime? In comparison with our netas, he is young and remarkably energetic. Thus, his desire for female company is both understandable and normal.
Mr Modi may claim to be an expert in governance and development but he needs coaching in the art of wooing. You don’t endear yourself to your lady love by putting a tail on her. You win her over by sending her amorous poems, by dazzling her with your wit, by whispering sweet nothings in her ear. If Modi had done some of these things, he wouldn’t have found himself in the predicament he is today.
Editor has been urging me to take a sabbatical from TV. He has a clear vested interest, since he gets locked up for hours when the TV crew come home. For myself, despite the ego massage and spurious celebrity, I am getting slightly bored with the responsibility of setting the national agenda every night at 9 pm! Should I take Editor’s advice?
I spent most of my time answering questions about Tarun J. Tejpal.
Vinod Mehta is editorial chairman, Outlook, and its founding editor-in-chief; E-mail your diarist: vmehta AT outlookindia.com
I refer to Vinod Mehta’s Delhi Diary (Dec 9). I think Mr Mehta should really take Editor’s advice about the sabbatical from television. It’s good advice. Get out of the argument whether the shameful silence should be broken alphabetically or chronologically, now that Cobrapost beats one to it, and TT has more pressing banter to engage in jailubrious Goa!
Sanjiv Datta, Noida
Why, Editor is an intelligent dog. About your appearances on national TV, his judgement seems to be bang on! A dog is man’s best friend; do take his advice seriously.
Sharat Chandra, Kalpakkam
I watch the stridency of view (it is just one view, irrespective of the topic - politics, harrassment of women, anything) that Kavitha Krishnan holds. Is she also one who has ascended the moral pedestal and will be exposed, like Tarun Tejpal and Shoma Chaudhury?
"I had the temerity to say “I like Tarun”. All hell broke loose..."
"I had the temerity to say “I like Tarun”. All hell broke loose..."
This is very revealing about the extent that feminists will go,to suppress any frank opinion of a male that may be to the liking of the feminists.
65 D Rakhal
Not to worry about Modi.
He already has a lady under his watchful eye. And he has declared that 'women power is with him'. Not to mention the secret deal with the feminists, to ban males from politics, if voted to power.
" he needs coaching in the art of wooing"
Vinod Mehta seems to be an expert in wooing ladies. May be he should write a book on the subject and send Modi a copy. After all, one should help each other in times of need.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT