Gandhi Before India is a play on words of his earlier book, India After Gandhi. In this book, historian and writer Ramachandra Guha talks about the formative years Mohandas Gandhi spent in South Africa, the people who influenced him and how his later philosophy was formed there. It’s about little-known people who were his mentors, friends and followers in Johannesburg, who are never given enough space in the Gandhi story. Vinod Mehta spoke to Guha.
Let’s start with this Joseph Lelyveld book which you dismissed out of hand as a bazaar gossip. How does it get such critical acclaim etc?
There is a footnote in my book saying that it is not really an important book. I don’t want to talk about it. There is a footnote and readers can read it. That’s it.
What about these letters – the Kallenbach letters? Did you play a role in that?
Yes, I did. Because I heard of them.
"In 1897, 50 years before Gandhi and Jinnah became fathers of nations, they almost became partners. Can you believe that?” Are they thousands?
No, there are hundreds. I will tell you a story about it, which is in a sense linked to your previous remark. I heard of them and went to Israel. I looked through them and they were incredibly rich. Our ambassador in Israel Navtej Sarna was convinced that they were important. I wrote a proposal. He forwarded it to the ministry and the ministry was offering $ 1,00,000 for it, which was fair. Meanwhile, Lelyveld’s book came out saying that Gandhi was gay and the old lady who controlled the letters died and her son increased the price by a million bucks more. If the government of India had acted immediately on my and Navtej’s recommendations you and I would have been paying less taxes today. They were really very interesting letters. In fact what I have tried to do in this book is to talk about all Gandhi’s friends—Kallenbach, Pollard, Pranjivan Mehta, this Gujarati merchant who supported him. In fact, people only read Gandhi’s letters, they don’t read letters to Gandhi and about him. And people like Kellenbach, Pollard, Pranjivan Mehta and his circular friends, the Gujarati merchant in South Africa and the way they sustained him, the way they inspired him, the way they criticised him when he was mistaken. I think that is quite striking.
Could you use some of that material in your book?
Lots and lots of that. Pranjivan Mehta is a really interesting person.
Today, that material lies in the archives?
Some lie in the archives, some lie in Ahmedabad, some in South Africa. The materials were gathered from all around the world.
I also went to South Africa, and went to that station, Pietermaritzburg. Was it the defining moment in his life? Did he get beaten up when he took the coach to Pretoria?
Not really. That was an important incident, but it was not defining. Attenborough makes it defining in his film and we saw Attenborough’s film. More important than that was an account in my book of a white mob attacking Gandhi in 1897. He comes to India to take his family back to South Africa. That is the second trip he was making to South Africa and he decides to make his home there. Kasturba and children are going. And there is a rumour that Gandhi is bringing 3000 Indian to immigrate into South Africa. The white mob comes and beats him up black and blue— physical beating. The book has details. That is defining. Here is a man who is 26. In the train incident he faced just one conductor who threw him out. Here there is a mob of thousands of white people abusing him, newspaper editorials calling him names— traitor, a money grabbing lawyer and so on. I think that is defining because that is the first time he meets such hostility and he faces it with courage and equanimity. That is the first thing. It is a demonstration of Gandhi’s courage in the face of a violent mob attack.
We can see in those pictures the working class...
Absolutely. They adore him. I think that is developed in South Africa.
How does it relate to his philosophy?
Very much so. I think South Africa is the place in which he has developed his philosophy. He is an insular Bania. He grows up as an insular Bania. If he had succeeded in Rajkot as a lawyer he would not have been more than a Bania. But he fails in Rajkot, so he goes to South Africa. He first comes across Gujarati merchants. He starts his Satyagraha and Gujarati merchants back out as the merchants are conservative people, as you know. Then the Tamil radicals, labourers come in.
How does his philosophy of Satyagraha develop in South Africa?
It develops partly as an opposition to this racist movement, but the important thing is that in the course of this he understands the diversity of India— of language, of caste, of religion— and also the fact that the white people can be on your side. The ecumenical, broadminded, cosmopolitan universalist worldview which emerges in South Africa. I pose a question in my book: if he had never left Kathiawar, if he had succeeded as a lawyer in Rajkot he would simply have been another Gujarati Bania.
That the imperial power must be confronted with non-violence—where does that come from?
So this philosophy started from South Africa and fine-tuned it in here?
That will the subject of a sequel. I am just looking at him in South Africa. Most of his ideas— his political ideas, his noble ideas, his spiritual ideas— were developed in South Africa.
There is some charge of racism against him when he was in South Africa that he didn’t engage with black movement. How valid is that?
It is not completely invalid, but he was not a blind racist. Like any human being, as a young man, as his predecessors of his time, when he first goes to South Africa he sees Africans as kaffirs— as uncultivated kaffirs. The more he lives there, the more sympathy they acquire with him. In my book you will see I talk about how he calls them uncivilised kaffirs to begin with but then he empathises with that discrimination. He writes editorials about how badly they are treated, how they are thrown out of railway carriages as he had been, and later he says they will also adopt Satyagraha to fight racial oppression. He meets several important African leaders. The founder of African National Congress, John Dube, was an acquaintance of his. So he slowly evolves. In South Africa, Gandhi was a community leader, he was an activist for the Indian diaspora. It is much later that he becomes a universal leader.
Gandhi likes Muslims, if I can put it as simply as that, and there were charges that he had fondness for the community. Did this develop because he was called from India to South Africa by the Gujarati Muslims and his initial interaction was with these people—Bohris?
There were Memons, Bohris, Surtis. And it is true that in South Africa he developed an understanding of Muslims. They sustained and supported him. As for his so called love for Muslims, it was not simply a payback for the fact that they helped him in his career. It was a deeply felt moral philosophy. His moral philosophy was that every religion is partly true and partly false. And the only way to become a better Hindu is to engage with Christians and Muslims and correct your faults. He was a religious pluralist and not a religious supremacist. He did not believe that Hindus are superior to Christians or to Muslims or to Jews and that again emerges through his South African experience.
Gandhi has always managed in India and South Africa to collect white friends. Were they drawn to him or was he consciously making sure that he was not just supported by the Indian community?
Had he something to say to all of them?
He listens. The important thing is that unlike the politicians of his time and the politicians of today, he listens to everyone. He was a good listener too. He was not a demi-god giving long speeches.
One of the other things said about Gandhi is that he was a great communicator, who knew about how he could interest the media in himself. For journalists, he provided very good copy.
He was also a great journalist. That is why South Africa becomes important because he starts a journal called Indian Opinion. He funds most of it, he writes quite a lot of it. It’s in Indian Opinion that he practices and perfects his skills as a good communicator. One of the striking things about Indian Opinion is that it is in four languages. Tilak’s Maratha came out in Marathi and English. Gandhi brings out a journal in Hindi, English, Gujarati and Tamil, catering to all sections of the population. So he knew if you want to effectively communicate you have to communicate in that person’s mother tongue. English was not enough, unlike the other elite nationalists like Naoroji and Gokhale. For Tamil, he had a Tamil editor. He was good in Gujarati and English. He had editors for Tamil and Hindi. This shows an extraordinary capacity for understanding the facets of effective communication. If you want to communicate to as wide a spectrum as possible, don’t restrict yourself to English. The Indian nationalists of the time, like Naoroji and Gokhale, wrote in English and sometimes they wrote in their mother tongues, like Tilak wrote in Marathi. But he said, "I've got to produce it in four languages". The masthead of his paper he produced was beautiful— one newspaper in four scripts. It was first started in Durban city, and a few months after it was started he shifted the printing press. He took it, dismantled it and carried it in four bullock carts to the Phoenix farms and reassembled and it was run there. Of course, I have been to the Phoenix Farms and the shed is still there, the printing press is not there...
I went there also. It is in bad shape...
It's in bad shape
Are we doing anything to...
They say one of the Gandhi’s granddaughters was trying to revive it, but...
I just wanted to ask you in South Africa of today many people are attacking his farms etc. Is he a sort of a forgotten figure?
Rajkot and Bombay High Court have done a favour by failing him as a lawyer. He says I used to doze at the high court because I couldn't get briefs and he used to joke about it— a brief-less lawyer. He jokes about it in his autobiography of 1920s. If you are famous you can joke about your failures. I have also speculated something else in my book. His father dies. After his father dies, he decides to go to London. His uncle says: 'Your father would have never allowed you to go, your father was totally opposed to crossing the kaalaapaani, your father was totally opposed to Englishmen wearing suits and drinking whisky. I will not allow you to go.' Then the mother takes an undertaking from him. Then he begs his mother: 'Let me go'. She allows him: Go, with an undertaking. If his father was alive that chap would not have allowed him to go. So there is a series of accidents that allow Gandhi to become what he was. If Bombay High Court had given him more clients, if Lord Milner had accepted his early compromise in 1904, you know...
What kind of a lawyer was he in South Africa? Was he a successful lawyer? Was he practising in white courts?
He was a successful lawyer because he had a monopoly. He was good, he was hardworking. He was the only Indian. He was extremely hardworking and spoke the language Gujarati. So, that helped. His clients couldn’t speak English, they spoke Gujarati. He was successful. He had a captive clientele. He was good. One discovery in my book is that in 1897 Gandhi was looking for a partner. He said the burden of representing all the Indians was too much. He wrote to a Parsi called Talyarkhan to come out and join him. He said: I can’t come. Then two letters were written from Jinnah to Gandhi at the same time. In Gandhi’s office log book, which I found in the Sabarmati Ashram, there are two letters received from M.A. Jinnah— letter received on: dated 21st January 1897 and 24th July 1897. So here is the speculation: I know Gandhi is looking for a partner. I know Gandhi was looking for a partner. I know that Jinnah was a struggling lawyer in Bombay in 1897. I know that Jinnah is a Gujarati Muslim and Gandhi is a Gujarati Hindu. I can only draw the inference, I can’t conclusively demonstrate it. It is a fascinating thought. In 1897, 50 years before Gandhi and Jinnah become the respective fathers of nations of divided India and Pakistan, they almost forged a legal partnership. It is a lovely thought.
He was not very successful lawyer in Bombay High Court. How then when he goes to South Africa develop as a successful lawyer? How does it happen? Is it because there is no competition? That too practising in hostile white courts.
It is partly so. Clients needed it. Legal system was just coming. Clients only spoke Gujarati. They barely have the knowledge of English and Hindi. He won cases. Lot of these cases were in courts. Lot of these courts were drafting memorials. Like: 'Get me a permit.' ' I want to cross from this territory to that territory.' ' I want an extension of this lease.' So it was that kind of language. He appeared in courts, but court appearances were not many.
Last question on South Africa. There is some suggestion that he was some sort of a domestic tyrant? Is that true?
Photograph by Tribhuvan Tiwari
What do you make of Narendra Modi? Do you feel there's a surge for him from the ground?
I think there is a surge. I think the surge is largely because of desperation. I think it is due to the weakness of Manmohan Singh and, of course, the reluctance of Rahul Gandhi to take a major role. The surge is not because of default. Narendra Modi is a profoundly compelling speaker in Gujarati and Hindi. So there is a surge. I have my personal reservations. I have apprehensions about the prospect of him, which is not to do with of 2002. My personal reservations have to do with — Ashis Nandy has also written about it— he has a really authoritarian personality. It is all about I, me, myself etc. I will give you one illustration of this. His coming out speech, which was the speech he delivered in Sri Ram College. You would recall he talks about how the milk in Delhi comes from Gujarat. Now a wise man would have said that there was a man called Verghese Kurien. Then he would have said, that the Communists in Kerala would not allow him to do his work, so he came to Gujarat and in its hospitable soil, he created this. But he can't say this Probably because Kurien is a Christian, he didn’t want to say it. Secondly, he didn’t want give credit to Kurien.
What about this 'dehati aurat' remark? Your friend Ananthamurthy says he will leave the country if Modi become PM...
I will stay and fight him and so will all of us. And in some ways it is good if he becomes the prime minister because in nine months he will expose himself.
And the Gandhi family. You've said Congress is great party but it must be rescued from the Gandhis
My fantasy is BJP without the RSS and the Congress without the Gandhis.
So we are heading towards strange times.
Yes, we are heading towards strange and difficult times, but we will come out of it in 10-15 years.
A shorter, slightly edited version of this interview appears in print. Mr Guha pointed out the correct dates of Mr Jinnah's letters to Gandhi to us later, which are reflected above. Also, the name of the Parsi lawyer whom Gandhi hoped to make his partner was erroneously mentioned as Dalia Khan in the print version of the interview.
I found Vinod Mehta’s interview of Ramachandra Guha, on the occasion of the release of his book on Gandhi, engrossing (‘Several accidents...Gandhi’, Oct 14). I refer here to his comments on Modi. Apart from being puzzled what a book on Gandhi has to do with Modi, Guha’s answer was interesting. It shows that the pseudo-liberals now think that the Modi surge is real. The same people were lecturing us a year back on how Modi’s appeal will be limited to Gujarat. Now I am all for Modi being the PM, let's give him a chance to expose himself. And one other thing. At one point Guha says, “Gandhi’s ability to disregard differences of race and faith was exceptional....” Really? Does this take into view his comments on the Blacks too? Or do Blacks not qualify as a race?
Rakhal Chandra Ghosh, Tomball, US
After mentioning that Gandhi was indebted to two mentors, one of them being Leo Tolstoy, I wondered if Guha during his research had come across the fact that Tolstoy, in turn, was greatly influenced by the thoughts of Etienne De La Boetie, as expressed in his The Politics Of Obedience: the Discourse of Voluntary Servitude. This seminal work, written in 1552, lays the foundation stone of civil non-violent disobedience. The quality of insight Boetie brings to politics and history—much of it still relevant today—is astonishing.
Aarmin Banaji, on e-mail
For a long time I was fed up with stories about Gandhi’s greatness. Only later, when I read more, did I realise that Gandhi was created by the circumstances of his time, like all other great heroes.
Nasar Ahmed, Karaikkudi
When analysing Gandhi’s attitude toward Blacks, let us understand that he lived in a different era altogether. It’s silly to judge him on those issues by 2013 standards.
Ram K., on e-mail
The discussion is about Guha's book on MK Gandhi and not about what Modi did or did not say about Kurien. Just creating deliberate confusion to drag in Modi (along with the usual secular gang like, Ananthamurthy and Ashis Nandy for support) and score a brownie point and a half. However, it is interesting to note that the secular-left-media mafia has come around to accept Modi's presence on the national scene. Modi has been the elected CM of Gujarat for more than a decade now. What is that he has not "exposed" till now that he would be exposing in just "nine months" if he becomes the PM? Anyhow, certainly generous on the part of Guha to allow Modi as PM, even as a nine-month wonder.
People have stopped taking Gandhi's ideology of secularism seriously as it is seriously flawed and it has always to do with appeasement policies for Muslims..
To secure good marks and to pass any govt entrance exam or school exams it is good to Study few important incident happned in Gandhi's life.
So, doubtful that Guha's book sale will fetch him enough fame and fortune.
Ramachandra Guha is a superb historian. He has a great passion for indepth analysis. He is a great Thinker and his commitment to Nation building is remarkable.
Abhijit Kane >> An Interview about Mahatma Gandhi Book with No photo of the Mahatma but a Photo Of & parting questions On NaMo
Good point . It is also important to ponder that this guy - Ramachandra Guha, is smartly marketing himself in the name of MK Gandhi and striking it rich too...
An Interview about Mahatma Gandhi Book with No photo of the Mahatma but a Photo Of & parting questions On NaMo?? Is it OCD (Obsessive Compulsive Disorder)? Or is it that Even Outlook can not Sell without NaMo? Poetic Justice!! And Finally Reluctant Acceptance of the "possiblity" of NaMo becoming PM even if for "He Exposing Himself". Way To Go Outlook.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT