In 2010, the year Gen Vijay Kumar Singh took over as the chief of the world’s third largest army, a report in the American magazine Rolling Stone ended the military career of Gen Stanley McChrystal, then commander of the US forces in Afghanistan. The picturing of the reckless general openly mocking the US president and the secretaries of state and defence led inevitably to McChrystal’s resignation. The profile headline—The Runaway General—said it all. (Curiously, the author of the piece, Michael Hastings, who was embedded with the US forces in Afghanistan, died in a car crash earlier this year. He was 33.)
In marked contrast, V.K. Singh has thrived as a runaway general, inside and outside office. His tenure at the top was marred by the unseemly row with the government over his date of birth, charges and counter-charges ranging from corruption to snooping, all of which made Sena Bhavan look like Police Academy. His post-retirement career plans, which have received a rather underwhelming baptism in the Anna Hazare-Baba Ramdev camp, have seen him caught smack bang in the political crosshairs of the Congress.
In April last year, while in service, Gen Singh had to combat questions over why, on the day his petition on his date of birth was coming up in the Supreme Court, two units of the army had moved from Hissar to Delhi without notifying the government. Last week, five days after he had shared the stage and held up his hands with the BJP’s prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi at a rally of ex-servicemen, Gen Singh had to answer questions on what the Technical Support Division (TSD), a covert operations initiative set up under his watch, was really up to in Jammu and Kashmir.
The questions mostly came on the front pages of the Indian Express, citing an army internal report. Was it true that the TSD had tried to topple the National Conference regime of Omar Abdullah by paying state agriculture minister Ghulam Hassan Mir—chief of a one-man party, with much experience on all sides in J&K’s murky party politics—Rs 1.19 crore? Had an NGO been paid Rs 2.38 crore by the TSD to file a PIL that could have shanghaied the career of Lt Gen Bikram Singh (now Gen Singh’s successor as army chief)? Gen Singh’s answers came on TV, first on Times Now and then on CNN-IBN, and somewhat later on Twitter—and they sucked the general deeper and deeper into a labyrinth of his own making.
No, it wasn’t just minister Mir, who he said was a “nationalist”; the army has paid almost all ministers in Kashmir. Not just now, but since independence, for “stabilising things”. “There are various things to be done as part of the stabilising factor in Jammu & Kashmir. Who funded the KPL (Kashmir Premier League)? Everyone, including the defence minister, was in the know. And if Omar Abdullah didn’t, good luck to him. If as a chief minister you do not know this, you are not running the state,” the general said.
Gen Singh attempted a minor climbdown by declaring that the payoffs were not bribes but were meant for “nation-building”—to wean away the youth from militancy and for “welfare programmes”, but the damage had been done. Out on the streets, in the Valley, the reaction was sanguine. “This is not really the best kept secret. Everyone knows here what the government and the security establishment have been up to,” said a newspaper editor in Srinagar. Pointing out that Tangmarg was a stronghold of Ghulam Hassan Mir, he said the unusual mass uprising there in September 2010, which led to police firing and the death of four civilians, might have been engineered to destabilise the government.
The charge that the TSD thought it could topple a democratically elected government with Rs 1.19 crore was laughed away, of course, but unwittingly Gen Singh had brought India’s Jammu & Kashmir policy back on the centrestage. Even the BJP, which otherwise enjoys a near-monopoly in its rhetoric on Article 370 and other issues embattling the sensitive state, was compelled to do a delicate balancing act in its reaction to the general’s comments.
Mirwaiz Umer Farooq of the Hurriyat described the disclosures as a can of worms, while Yasin Malik of the JKLF filed a petition in the high court demanding a copy of the inquiry report submitted by Lt General Vinod Bhatia on the working of the TSD. The former army chief, too, has filed an application under the Right to Information Act for a copy of the report, with the acerbic quip that if the report could be shared with a newspaper, there could be no harm in sharing it with him.
While chief minister Omar Abdullah maintained a studied silence, National Conference MP Dr Mehboob Beg was scathing. “Coming as it does from a former army chief, his claim has weakened all mainstream political parties here and strengthened separatists. In one blow, he has managed to erode the credibility of our democratic institutions.” Fuming, he said that he or anyone else in the Valley did not require a character certificate from the general. “We have fought separatists politically. Our people have laid down their lives. And now this gentleman comes along to say that it was the army which was maintaining national integrity.”
The battle-lines have been drawn. Leaking details of intelligence operations, argues Gen Singh, amounts to treason. A section of the people using social media suggest, on the other hand, that it is Gen Singh who is guilty of treason—for having tried to meddle in the democratic process and topple a government elected by the people.
The controversy, which has all the makings of a thriller, has left all players with mud on their face. A sheepish Union government once again put its foot in the mouth by initially suggesting that the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) could be entrusted with the inquiry into the role of the retired general and the TSD. On allegations of payoffs to politicians in Jammu and Kashmir, Union home minister Sushilkumar Shinde offered the lame alibi that the government would order an inquiry if people were named.
The general, who has been busy mobilising farmers, war veterans and ex-soldiers, stands accused of tilting at windmills, being a loose cannon and being a little too full of himself. There are, however, those who argue that a witch-hunt leaves him with no option but to fight back. In the process, what has been weakened is not just the democratic process in the country, but also the army, with fissures within the organisation widening like never before.
Apropos of General in his Labyrinth (Oct 7), I wish Gen V.K. Singh had exercised better judgement about revealing secrets on intel-ops in J&K. I saw the TV report, the interviewer provoked to deceive: one day goading the soldier to be honest, the next day using the “quotes” in an anti-V.K. Singh polemic broadcast hours on end.
R.D. Singh, Ambala
The controversy over the general’s age, the ‘coup attempt’ story, the startling army board of officers’ report—there is reason to believe these were all leaked by the government. It’s this government that should be tried for treason.
Novonil Guha, on e-mail
The government must be regretting its ploy of smearing the general (Loosening His Cannon), who has hit back by revealing the dirty intel tricks played out in Kashmir.
Dr V. Mahadevan, Chennai
I refer to the article on Gen V.K. Singh, and his courting controversy with regularity (Loosening His Cannon, Oct 7). The Indian armed forces have always had a non-controversial, non-political image. They were always among the world’s finest disciplined, apolitical forces. Many of our chiefs, like Cariappa, Thimayya and Manekshaw, had their own share of skirmishes with their political bosses. But none of them compromised the dignity of their office, or of the defence forces as a whole, by going to the press and washing (allegedly) dirty linen in public.
The best course in the interest of Indian Security and Army only is that let Mr Anthony call Gen VK Singh in his chambers and sort out all the issues.
Don't forget some higher ups in the Ministery who had access to the Top Secret Paper purposely leaked the contents to Indian Express who stupidly lapped up the Leak just for TRIPS forgting the Scecurity angle.
That lit the fires and FGeneral was bound to retort and he did .
And it is not the first time last time IE published that Tanks were moving towards Delhi .
And the Babus perched high were never taken to task then and now.
Not to left behind OutLook too is indulging in publishing article after article on the subject and playing with our Security .
Had it been Pakistan both Mehta and Shekhar Gupta would have been in the hands of ISI and would have been answering groaning the questions in the typical ways the ISI asks.
Freedom of Press yes but the interests and security of Country are supreme and paramount .
I wish Gen (retd) V K Singh came clean about the controversy that about the paper-work that led to his accepting the change in his year of birth. Did he really sign any papers? Did he sign under duress (no promotion)? Or because he was offered a big juicy carrot (GOC 2 Corps)? And insurance that he would be made COAS never mind what? Come on, the General (retd) was offered a chance by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and he could have come clean then instead of withdrawing his petition. What prevented him pursuing his case to its logical end? Daal mein bahut kala?????
Has there been any government in the past that consistently leaked information to the media to the detriment of an Army Chief? Government regularly leaked info about the age issue to Chandigarh Tribune. The government leaked a fake coup story to Coupta of IE. The government leaked VKS' letter to the PM and now the government again leaks a GOO report to IE after sitting on it for six months. It is this government which should be tried for treason.
In all other democracies its the individuals that leak embarassing details / state secrets to media to score a point against the government .. only in India the central government resorts to leaking state secrets supposedly to humiliate individuals ..
cutting the nose to spite the face .
Thank you General Sahib. We are proud of you. In an establishment of hijras(with apologies to real hijras), there is at least one man who is willing to stand up for honor and pride. May your tribe increase.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT