After the 'Vanzara' letter-bomb, there is another 'explosive' storm building up for the Narendra Modi government in Gujarat with Babu Bajrangi, who was sentenced to imprisonment for life in the 2002 Naroda-Patiya communal carnage, making defiant noises against the move to seek death penalty for him and four others while sparing former minister Maya Kodnani.
After mounting pressure from the higher echelons of the Sangh Parivar set up has led to the Modi government going soft on former minister of state for child welfare, Maya Kodnani while allowing the others of the hindutva brigade to be "sacrificed" in the Naroda Patiya murder case of 2002 in which 96 people lost their lives, there is turmoil within the ranks with the accused as well as the sympathizers split over the move.
The Gujarat Government has decided not to let the Supreme Court appointed Special Investigation Team (SIT) seek death penalty for Kodnani while it has given the go-ahead for the five others. Babu Bajrangi is a one time Bajrang Dal front ranker.
In the verdict delivered by the special court judge Jyotsna Yagnik last year, life imprisonment had been ordered for all the 31 convicts - 28 years in jail to Kodnani, entire life for Babu Bajrangi, 31 years to seven others and 24 years to the rest.
However, earlier this year the state government decided to move the higher court to seek death for Kodnani and Bajrangi along with eight others and appointed three lawyers for this purpose in April.
However, the decision came under trenchant criticism from the hindutva set up. Though Modi had no love lost for Kodnani and her name had not even figured in his list of probables for the BJP ticket in the 2007 vidhan sabha elections, he had relented under pressure from party veteran and Gandhinagar MP L.K. Advani.
Highly placed sources aver that Kodnani has enjoyed strong backing in the RSS hierarchy all along. But Modi guided by political objectives and in his ‘sadbhavana’ mode after his national ambitions surfaced, hoped to fulfil two objectives with one move and therefore seemed inclined to give in to the SIT plea for appealing against the special court verdict and seeking enhanced sentence, which in this case was the death penalty. With the RSS pressing initially for Modi’s appointment as campaign committee chief of the BJP for the 2014 elections and subsequently naming him as the man for the top job, he is reported to have acquiesced to the demand to spare Kodnani but has run foul of the others.
Bajrangi who was brought to the court from the Sabarmati jail in connection with the hearing of the Naroda gam case in which he and Kodnani are being tried for the killing of 11 people in the post-Godhra riots on February 28,2002 told mediapersons, "I have a lot to reveal but this is not the proper time to speak”. He was known to be unhappy over the decision to seek death penalty for him and the others while sparing Kodnani who was termed as the kingpin in the judgment last year. Bajrangi did not elaborate, chosing to get into the van that was waiting to take him back to jail from the court.
In the case of Kodnani, the Gujarat Advocate General (AG) Kamal Trivedi has opined against the SIT appealing for enhanced punishment for the former minister as there was "no direct evidence" against her. The doctor-politician even managed a berth in the Gujarat Ministry in 2007 despite her alleged role in the riots. Seen exhorting the killers of Naroda Patiya she had however broken down in the court and even blamed a political conspiracy for her predicament.
Special Judge Jyotsna Yagnik had stopped only short of pronouncing death penalty for the perpetrators of one of the worst massacres of 2002 Gujarat riot stating that while death penalty may have been desirable, the global trend against the same in recent years cannot be overlooked. The court had further believed that "use of death undermines human dignity".
Bajrangi’s veiled statement gets added importance after DIG D.G. Vanzara, who is in jail as an accused in a number of alleged fake encounters by the police in Gujarat, sent in his resignation with a bombshell of a letter that charged former minister of state for Home, Amit Shah with crimes of commission and omission and took the chief minister to task for blindly supporting him in his misadventures.
Yes , it would be quite a storm; Storm in a teacup !
It is extremely intriguing why Modi should shun his warriors who waged the massacre on his behalf.Vanzara has now said Modi and his administration want to keep them away or in jail though they carried out the atrocites on their behalf.
There is a great danger if these henchmen turned approvers and implicate Modi and his ilk and that would be welcome.
One wishful thinking after another wishful thinking. And the life goes on.
However, the decision came under trenchant criticism from the hindutva set up.
This the real problem.
The most worrisome factor for corrupt sec is, in each poll survey MSM mounted sacrificing SG is liked by less than 4% for PM post. Sum total of likes of RG,MMS and SG are less than likes of NaMo. A political figure, liked by less than 4%, and you think he/she can attract voters. Now what next by sec MSM- simple- delition SG's name from probables of PM post onwards. So no body could know her (un)popularity.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT