In my long professional career, covering two incidents amidst difficult circumstances is etched in my mind. One was the assassination of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi and the other the dismissal of Andhra Pradesh chief minister N.T. Rama Rao. Both happened in 1984 in a space of two months. Both were heads of state and charismatic leaders with a popular mass base and both had built up a personality cult around themselves. What happened to them had its own echo in the country.
There was a month-long political drama in August-September 1984 when NTR was dismissed and later reinstated by a rattled Indira Gandhi. Mrs Gandhi’s assassination in October was a shocking incident, resulting in the Sikh riots in Delhi. There was mob fury, violence, riots, curfew and arson in the aftermath.
I was a reporter in Hyderabad working for the UNI. It was not so dangerous for women scribes to work in the field, although we were only a handful. N.T.Rama Rao came to power riding on the slogan of “Atma gauravam” when Rajiv Gandhi insulted Andhra Pradesh chief minister T. Anjiah at the airport in 1982. By August 1984, his own trusted aide Bhaskara Rao got NTR dismissed with the help of the Congress and installed himself as a puppet chief minister. This naturally resulted in swelling of popular support in favour of NTR followed by a month long instability, curfew, violence and arson.
I had a rickety old Fiat, which I used to drive myself. My movements were restricted because of the curfew and there was an eerie silence in the capital with the army flag march. I used to leave home in the morning and invariably return after midnight during the entire month, spending most of the time going from place to place. Once I had to face an agitating mob, but fortunately a friendly policeman who had seen me around rescued me.
NTR created history when Indira Gandhi, realizing her mistake, reinstated him after a month. Before I could recover, I was transferred to Delhi. To my dismay, the day after I landed in Delhi, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi was assassinated. I was called to report for work and sent as part of the news team to the AIIMS where she was taken. By late afternoon, the crowds near the hospital began to swell and were getting out of control. I was also pushed around along with the numerous media persons keeping vigil. When President Giani Zail Singh arrived at the AIIMS at 5.25 PM, his motorcade was attacked. The mob shouted, “ Blood for blood.” By evening Rajiv Gandhi became the Prime minister.
On the way back home that night, I found men with sticks and kerosene going around looking for Sikh victims. The next morning I had a horrendous experience. I was staying with relatives in Janakpuri. Around 9 AM, I heard shots in the street and found hooligans shouting “Indira Gandhi zindabad”, while looting the gurudwara opposite. Before we could stop them, they fled. Several other shops were also looted in the area and Sikhs were particularly targeted. The next two days I was put on the duty to cover the two assassins who were treated in Ram Manohar Lohia hospital. More horrendous stories were pouring out in the hospital.
On the fourth day, I accompanied BJP leader Vijayaraje Scindia, who came prepared with food for distribution in the relief camps but the victims told her in one voice that what they needed was security.
Looking back I find it fascinating how I had moved along with history but what kept us going was the challenging and fearless profession, which I felt was a shield to me.
A shorter, edited version of this appears in print.
Kalyani Shankar is a senior journalist
I appreciate the writer's courage and dedication to her profession. It should have taken great strength of mind and heart to challenge the hooligans attacking the Gurdwara. However, I would like to point out that Indira Gandhi did not reinstate NTR out of a realisation of her 'mistake'. It took an unprecedented public uproar, and a massive operation of conveying all the MLAs to Delhi and parading them before the then President to demonstrate that the grounds on which his Government was dismissed, namely losing the majority of the Assembly, was a sham and a badly put up job in which the then Governor, Ramlal, was an active abettor. The author is being unduly kind to Indira Gandhi for the unpadonable sin Indira committed.
Sikhs did not got justice but they have moved on with life and are not stuck up in 1984 like Muslims 2002.
That is why today Sikhs are far well off now than 1984 .They have been voted as the highest spender group in India.
Muslims too are not less enterprising but they can't drop the baggage of 2002.Time for them to drop the old baggage along with their unfaithful and self seeking so called well wishers TOO .
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT