Every crisis is an opportunity. Nowhere does this ring truer than in Jammu and Kashmir, where political parties are out to squeeze the last ounce of partisan mileage from the recent violence in Kishtwar. This unedifying spectacle is hardly surprising. When it comes to J&K, our public discourse invariably generates more heat than light. The complex politics of the state is reduced to a caricature of ‘separatism’, while gross failures on the part of the Indian State and democracy remain unacknowledged. In consequence, we tend at once to overstate the ‘threat’ posed by every upsurge in J&K and to overlook the importance of issues that fuel these crises.
To get a measure of the current crisis, we need to consider the specificities of the politics of the Jammu region. Pre-1947, Muslims were a majority in the undivided Jammu province. In the western districts of Mirpur, Poonch and Reasi—large chunks of which are currently in PoK—Muslims were numerically preponderant. But even in the Hindu-majority Jammu, Udhampur and Kathua districts in the east, they were a substantial minority. Owing to the anti-Muslim violence and ethnic cleansing in J&K in late ’47 as well as the de facto partition of the state, the Muslims were reduced to a small, terrified minority in Jammu.
This determined the subsequent trajectory of their politics. Jammu’s Muslims took a practical view of their plight and sought to build their lives anew. But the region’s politics was hardly conducive to their attempts. Grievances over Jammu’s marginalisation in the new political dispensation of J&K fused with the communalism of the Hindu right. The resulting cocktail of ultra-nationalism (demand for full integration, abrogation of Article 370, etc) and Hindu majoritarianism was readily consumed by the RSS and its political avatar, the Jana Sangh. Yet, Jammu’s Muslims tread a cautious track, supporting demands for greater autonomy from Srinagar. Following the onset of the insurgency in the late ’80s, they refrained from endorsing the cause of the separatist groups in the Valley—never mind the Hurriyat’s claims to speak for the state’s Muslims. This is true even of its northwestern districts, including Kishtwar, which are geographically closest to the Valley and which have a Muslim majority.
Yet, their position remains difficult. Think of the 2008 crisis over Amarnath land. Jammu Muslims were caught between the demands of the Valley Muslims and the Jammu Hindus. They were also the target of the ire of the Hindu right in Jammu: BJP state president Ashok Khajuria threatened them with expulsion. The claim, advanced in the context of the recent riot in Kishtwar, that Jammu Muslims take their orders from the ultras in the Valley is ridiculous.
It is equally erroneous to link this violence to insurgency. Indeed, in northwestern Jammu, insurgents have nothing like the popular support they have in parts of the Valley. And this despite the fact that these districts are remote, not very well-connected and highly underdeveloped. Even at the height of insurgency, the militants had to resort to high levels of coercion and intimidation of the locals while operating in these parts. The suggestion that we are now facing a situation akin to 1990 is both misguided and malicious.
The immediate provocation for the violence in Kishtwar is as yet unclear. However, the build-up of communal tension was stoked by the killing of four civilians by the BSF a few weeks back in the nearby district of Ramban. Faced by a protest against their attempts to interfere in the offering of late-night prayers during Ramzan, the BSF opened fire, killing four and injuring 44 unarmed civilians. An internal inquiry predictably gave them a clean chit, on grounds of self-defence.
It remains to be seen whether the BSF will get entirely off the hook. But the incident underscores the culture of impunity central to Kashmir’s travails. State agencies routinely commit crimes against civilians, but are seldom prosecuted. Along with the impunity is the insouciance. Compare the justified outrage at the killing of our soldiers along the LoC with the complete indifference to the killing of unarmed fellow citizens by the security forces. This is the face of the Indian State and democracy the people of J&K see. Is it a surprise that every tremor, however local its impulse, tends to acquire the tenor of a protest against the State?
New Delhi, however, remains unwilling to take the minimum necessary steps to redress the situation. Every lull in violence and tension is seen not as an opportunity for reform but to reinforce the status quo. No wonder the other parties continue to fish in troubled waters.
(The writer is a senior fellow at the Centre for Policy Research.)
Apropos Srinath Raghavan's column, The Jammu Muslim... (Aug 26), Jammu is being converted into a Muslim-majority town. Kashmiri Muslims, including top politicians, have built huge bungalows in the town. The Kashmiri Pandits, by contrast, have nowhere to go. The truth is that the Muslims are getting the best of both Jammu and Kashmir, and the Kashmiri Hindus are being the hardest hit. Raghavan should visit Jammu and see the refugee camps near Nagrota or Muthi and the new areas where the Kashmiri Muslims are building the bungalows.
Ashok Sapru, Lagos
To talk about the expulsion of Hindus from the Kashmir Valley can hurt the sentiments of Muslims in the Valley and lead to communal trouble. So please let’s just pretend it never happened and half a million Hindus, who had lived there for thousands of years, decided to give up their homes, businesses and lives and become paupers and refugees, to give Islamists a bad name.
Rajiv Shorey, Houston
Strange that we have a privileged upper-class Hindu telling us how Muslims feel!
Bharat Paul, San Francisco
The Jammu story follows the standard narrative. Riots, partition and then persecution. A Muslim in India has suffered and there's no denying of the fact. However, there's something amiss in this leitmotiff of post colonialism, post partition Indian history.
Lo and Behold, one of the characters of Indian history has vanished and no one bats an eyelid. The story Hindus of Mirpur, Poonch and Reasi of what is called as "Azad Kashmir" comes to end with the partition. No one is to be bothered about the end of Jammu Hindu of POK. What happened to them?
We are told that Hinduism is a religion of idolator pagans and they convert to better religion like Islam. It has happened in Pakistan and it is happening at a faster pace in Bangladesh. But Hindus aren't alone. Christians and Jews in Arab world too convert to a better religion over the time. It has happened with Buddhists and it will happen again and again and again.
You just lost me after the second paragraph..... But then you are most likely a secular and it is a good thing.
Kishtwar found place in main stream media is because Hindus have retaliated with full force in Jammu by not allowing Mulims to successed in there nefarious design.
"ethinic cleansing" in 1947? what is this? i thought it happened decades later when the pandits were pushed out of their homeland.
What a shabby and biased opinion piece. No facts, lots of assumptions, some innuendo and a grand judgement! Can't imagine why you get published.
>> Ensure that for every 10 posts you make (condemning MODI, BJP etc) you make one post on how pakistan has destroyed its religious minorities and how kashmir has liquidated its pandits.
If you understood what was being discussed, you would not be making an idiot of yourself all the time.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT