Leader of opposition in the Rajya Sabha on the demand to condemn the resolution of Pakistan Parliament with regard to the execution of Afzal Guru.
Yesterday a very serious development has taken place from India's national point of view that the Parliament in Pakistan has passed a resolution condemning the execution of a person who has been convicted for an attack on Indian Parliament.
Besides being interference in India's internal affairs, it is an official statement which comes from the combined polity of Pakistan. So far we had wondered who was really in control of the state — their army, their ISI, a civilian government or non-state actors. But with yesterday's resolution, all these distinctions have been obliterated. It is an official stamp of approval on one of the worst terrorist attacks that took place in India.
So far we have always alleged and there was evidence to suggest that for an attack on Indian Parliament planning was done across the border but yesterday's resolution seems to have confirmed our worst fears because the polity of the country unanimously condones that action by actually condemning our action in sentencing through a rule of law the person who was involved in this.
Sir, the beheading of our soldiers, the bomb blasts in Hyderabad, the attack on the CRPF camp in Srinagar finally have culminated into this resolution. This now clearly shows what the intention of Pakistan in this matter seems to be. The government will now seriously have to consider how to deal with Pakistan in this situation. The hon. Prime Minister has in the past been very magnanimous to say that he is willing to walk an extra mile.
After a series of these provocations, we would like to urge him that forget a mile, he should now forget walking even an extra yard. Pakistan does not deserve this. As long as this resolution remains, the question of a continued dialogue with Pakistan which is approving of showing sympathy for terrorist attacks in India, I think, we should seriously forget discussing any serious issue with them through a structured dialogue. Therefore, Pakistan will now have to walk extra two miles rather than our Prime Minister wanting to walk an extra mile. If we want to normalise relations, with these kinds of resolutions, normalisation of relations will not be possible.
Sir, this comes in the backdrop of a serious situation which our country is facing, whether it is Male or it is Rome or it is Islamabad, I think we seriously need to discuss our foreign policy and where it is leading us, because if India can be kicked around in this manner internationally, then there is something seriously wrong in the manner in which we are managing our external affairs.
So, I would urge you to kindly fix a date so that the hon. Prime Minister and the External Affairs Minister are here, make a statement and this House gets an opportunity to discuss this issue at length.
If India is the laughing stock of the world today ( and the crying stock of all Indians ), it is because :
a. The national opposition is a uge blunder, made of opportunistic communalists, who cannot offer a meaningful alternative, but keeps jumping only when the word 'Pak' is uttered ( thanks to their bigotted philosophy )
b a judiciary that is ludicrous and simply unaccountable and does not finish cases on time, or punish perjury
c. a highly religious people
What has Jaitley done to make things different ( for the better )?
All parties play religious politics in our country ...
we were always religious ... what does it matter to anyone ?? we should change just because some dope-loving westerners do not agree with us ??
Not all parties play religious politics.
And if they did, it is the duty of the judiciary to uphold the constitution and not allow divisive politics.
I have never heard Jaitley ever mention religion, Hindu-Muslim-Sikh ekta akhandata bla bla. He is the best and the most responsible parliamentarian India ever produced.
This male unblocked should stick to his female bashing which he loves doing.
Mr Jaitley does also understand, that in Sri Lanka, many Tamilians who had some sentimental interest in Tamil Nadu, were killed by Prabhakaran as traitors. I cannot understand what is the issue. Are the people, who are living in Tamil Nadu, who had relatives killed by Prabhakaran, traitors to Tamil Nadu? They are Tamilians, living now. Are they traitors to Prabhakaran's son? I talk as a layperson to govt., and politics.
I like the sport of football, not because either Italy or England have to loose, in an international friendly, or at the World Cup. Perhaps, because I can admire either winning, and the other is not the less for loosing.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT