An over-anxiety on the part of the government of India to oblige the Italian government on the issue of the two Italian marines, who have been charged with killing two Kerala fishermen wrongly mistaking them for pirates in an incident that took place on February 15, 2012, has created suspicions in public mind on the bona fides of the government of India. The Italian marines were posted as sentries on board a private Italian tanker at the time of the incident.
The following two questions arose as a result of the incident:
The Italian contention was that the incident took place outside Indian territorial waters and that the fishermen definitely appeared to be approaching the Italian tanker with hostile intention, which gave the Marines the right to open fire in self-defence.
The Indian contention was that the incident took place in Indian waters and that the Kerala fishermen were unarmed. Hence, the question of their approaching the Italian vessel in a hostile manner did not arise.
India rejected Italy’s demand that the case should be tried before an Italian court in Italy. Having rejected the Italian contention, India should have vigorously gone ahead in prosecuting the Italian marines. It did not do so.
On the contrary, special facilities were given to the accused Italian marines and there was a definite half-heartedness in proceeding against them. They were released on bail and allowed to stay in a hotel at the expense of the Italian embassy. They were allowed to go to Italy to spend Christmas with their families—an extraordinary gesture to under-trials in a murder case. Even though they were supposed to be in Indian judicial custody, they were not accompanied to Italy by Indian guards. However, they returned from Italy after Christmas as promised by the Italian Embassy in New Delhi.
On January 18, 2013, the Indian Supreme Court had ruled that the Kerala government had no jurisdiction to prosecute the marines and had directed the union government to constitute a special court in consultation with the Chief Justice of India (CJI) for fresh trial.
There was a delay in constituting the special court, which led the Supreme Court to observe as follows: "Why is the Centre dragging its feet over the matter? Nobody has initiated any consultation process till now."
Even as the government of India was dragging its feet on setting up the special court, applications from the marines for permission to go to Italy again to cast their votes in the Italian elections on February 22 came up for hearing before the Supreme Court. The government of India did not vigorously oppose the applications on the ground that the marines could exercise their postal ballot or vote in the Italian embassy. The Italian embassy’s contention that postal ballot was not possible was accepted and on a commitment made by the embassy that they would return after casting their ballots they were allowed to travel to Italy.
Even though the elections were over on February 22, they did not return till March 11. Nobody in Delhi appeared to have noticed this delay till the Italian foreign office informed the government of India on March 11 that the marines would not return since the government of India had no jurisdiction to try them. A new government, which advocated a stronger line against the government of India on this issue, had come to power after the February 22 elections and it had no qualms about breaking the commitment made by the previous government to the Indian Supreme Court. This time too, the marines travelled to Italy as free individuals and not as under-trials in Indian judicial custody
The credibility of the government of India in the eyes of the Indian public has taken a beating as a result of the seeming over-anxiety of the government to oblige Italy instead of asserting on its right to have them tried before a special court as ordered by the Supreme Court.
The half-heartedness of the government of India in prosecuting the Marines is likely to be interpreted by the detractors of the government as an indicator of the influence exercised by Italy over the government of India’s actions in this case.
Apart from the usual drama of diplomatic protests, the government has placed the country in a position of having very few options to uphold the country’s self-respect and honour.
B. Raman is Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt of India, New Delhi, and, presently, Director, Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai, and Associate of the Chennai Centre For China Studies.
Arun Kumar Saxena · Works at Joint Secretary in M/ Prog Implementation.
"Outlook India : 'Why Is The Centre Dragging Its Feet?"'
So asked the Supreme Court, when there was a delay in constituting the special court as recommended by it, on the issue of Italian marines. Now the credibility of the government has taken a beating
The covert Italian connection to the controversy is getting clearer. Events are fast overtaking the GOI ( Read as the Congress headed by Sonia Gandhi).The unprofessional stance of Indian government – over indulgent , subservient – always anxious to oblige the Italian govt by extending VIP facilities to the two under convicts , charged with the killing of two Indian fishermen, is writ large on the faces of career diplomats and strategic analysts. One gets a whiff of it in the corridor...s of powers in South Block. The attitude of GOI has been slow and lackadaisical from the inception. For instance, while questioning the jurisdiction of the Kerala court in the prosecution of two marines, the Supreme court directed the GOI on January 18,2013 to set up Special court in consultation with the CJI for fresh trial. The delay in setting up the special court led the Apex court to observe "Why is the Centre dragging its feet over the matter”. The CJI has not been consulted till date.Who is forcing the GOI from within to slow down the due process of law ? In between, the GOI did not stoutly oppose the accused applications seeking permission to go to Italy for voting.Strangely,the Italian ambassador, his family and staff exercised their right for postal voting without visiting Italy. Why were execeptions made in case of two Italian under-convicts? This calls for an independent probe by a Supreme court monitored panel. The country is entitled to know the extraneous considerations on which decisions on crucial issues are taken on political grounds by ignoring national interests. Meanwhile, India has become “Trishanku”,a “laughing stock”,in its own eyes.
A K SAXENA (A retired civil servant)
Those ITalian marines are not diplomats,
I meant to say those Rapists are not diplomats or foreigners.
>>>Is there some geneva convention that rapists cannot celebrate festivals while they are still undertrials/not convicted?
Why are you yakking about Geneva convention. Those ITalian marines are not diplomats,
>>> I would also repeat that if Italian Mariners can be sent home for christmas, I would also repeat that if Italian Mariners can be sent home for christmas, why dont we release the Nirbhaya rapists to go home for Holi? Maybe escort them all the way till they finish having fun and bring them back to Tihar?
The problem with numbskulls like you,Ramki is that you come up with somw bizzare allegations about the things I have posted. When did I ever say that it was right to let the marines go home for Christmas? Can you point out one single sentence where I have said that the decision was correct and that I support it.
What I have mentioned is that they were allowed to go home for Christmas and they returned back to India. That is fact. That actually happened. It is not my opinion.
Probably the Indian Supreme court let them go back the second time based on that event, but failed to take into consideration a new government had come to power.
I would also repeat that if Italian Mariners can be sent home for christmas, why dont we release the Nirbhaya rapists to go home for Holi? Maybe escort them all the way till they finish having fun and bring them back to Tihar?
Is there some geneva convention that rapists cannot celebrate festivals while they are still undertrials/not convicted?
Maybe my good Friend Honourable shri Suresh Kamathji could clarify ont his..
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT