As on March 06, 2013
Long before Cheteshwar Pujara finally broke through the exalted ranks of Indian cricket’s heavyweight division and imparted a sense of security to a new middle-order, Parthiv Patel used to call him ‘Don Bradman’. The former India wicketkeeper was in awe of the precociously gifted Saurashtra batsman’s insatiable appetite for runs. Pujara is at a safe distance from the Don’s fluid aggression or his unconquerable average—few have come even close—but there are shades of the Greatest in his penchant for mammoth innings. His latest tour de force, an unforced 204 against Australia in Hyderabad, was another proof of how Donnish he is in crafting an innings that wraps itself around the tempo of play—waxing, waning, just rolling on.
Pujara has scored 1,017 runs in just 11 Tests at an average of 67.80 with two tons and two double hundreds. “Right from the Ranji level, he goes for the big scores. This habit has matured over time. Fighting an injury and making a comeback is great. Pujara doesn’t get stuck, rotates the strike well and tries to go that extra mile,” says former opening batsman and selector Krishnamachari Srikkanth. He is right about Pujara’s appetite for runs: his 306 n.o. (516b, 36x4), a national record, versus Baroda in the West Zone under-14 tournament in 2000-01, is an early example.
So is the one-down slot, left vacant by Dravid, already taken by Pujara? To be sure, he’s yet to prove himself on fast-paced foreign tracks (his high scores have been at home). Prima facie, he’s like an experimental blend of Dravid and Laxman in equal parts—technical excellence, stolid defence and a sound temperament complementing artful stroke- making—but pending a final trial against bounce and swing. The essentials are there, though. “Pujara’s approach is very positive. He has a rich repertoire of shots and plays them according to the situation,” says former cricketer Anshuman Gaekwad. “He knows how to control his innings and has done well at No. 3, despite some bad outings in South Africa. When he pulls the short ball we do see Dravid, but he’s not a Dravid clone. He’s his own man,” says cricket writer Suresh Menon. Chintu, as friends call him, is very focused, says his Saurashtra teammate Sitanshu Kotak, a veteran of 129 first-class matches. “His temperament enables him to handle situations without curbing his game. Remember how he reached 150 against Australia by hooking Siddle for a spectacular six?” he asks.
That settled it. Stellar scores in junior, Ranji and India A followed, then experts’ endorsement of a Test No. 3 in incubation. He graduated on to the international scene with an impressive debut in the second Test in Bangalore in 2010 with a match-winning 72 against the Aussies. But injuries, that bane of professional sportsmen, followed. He sat out the disastrous touring season of 2011-12, missing a chance to gain exposure in the West Indies, England and Australia, but bounded back to ply his wares against the English at home, another series most of his teammates would gladly forget.
A young Pujara watches Ashok Mankad at a coaching camp in Rajkot
“I was determined not just to stage a comeback or prove my ability but also to help India win,” Pujara said after the two-Test series against the Kiwis. Niggling questions about his fitness remain. Through much of his double ton against the Aussies, he was hobbling from a bad knee. “He needs to guard against complacency and fitness to have a long career,” says cricket writer Ayaz Memon.
There’s not been much scope for complacency yet. It was amid fin de siecle gloom that Pujara was drafted in for the England return tour. Eight back-to-back Test losses overseas was a debacle that hastened the end of Dravid and Laxman’s careers. Their exit yanked the curtains down on the unbroken glory years of the Fab Four—the weight of the moment seemed to accentuate a never-before fragility in the batting line-up. In such flux and uncertainty, there was no room for failure. Pujara’s response: a masterly 206 not out in the first Test in Ahmedabad and an even better, watchful 135 on a treacherous Mumbai wicket, a lone sentinel against the venomous guile of Panesar and Swann, in the second Test.
He seems a lot like Dravid and Laxman as a person too—affable, yet very private. “When he was with IPL’s Kolkata Knight Riders, it was mandatory to go to parties. But the team management acceded to his request, allowed him to stay in his room. He prefers simple food, preferably Gujarati, and doesn’t even drink colas,” says uncle Bipin. A religious person, he never misses his daily puja and meditation. A devotee of guru Hariprasadji Maharaj, he makes it a point to visit him whenever he is in Rajkot. It perhaps helped anchor him when he lost his mother to cancer in 2005. “My mom always wanted to see me play for India. She made me promise I would fulfil her wish. She’d have been delighted to see me in India colours,” says Pujara. This winter, he married a girl his family chose for him. “No, it wasn’t a love affair,” says wife Puja Pabari, an MBA in retail marketing. “It was purely an arranged thing. We didn’t know each other till our families met and decided.”
Unsurprisingly, Pujara was disciplined in school, and is set on getting a graduate degree. “He was a bright student, intelligent, with a sharp memory. And despite cricket, fairly punctual,” remembers his school principal, Swati Pandya. All the traits you want in a No. 3: most of all, the guarantee that he’ll be there. His friends say his fondest wish is to triumph against bowlers overseas. Bradman in England, 1930, appears like a beacon.
By Haresh Pandya in Rajkot with Priyadarshini Sen
Apropos Take Him Out The Next Day (Mar 18), Cheteshwar Pujara is different from Dravid in his batting style and approach but identical as far as his Dravid-likeness to Indian cricket is concerned. A lot more slim and a tad less elegant than Wasim Jaffer, he thrives in Indian conditions like the latter. For India’s sake, let’s hope he learns to cope with the tougher swing and seam conditions overseas fast. He has a long way to go to be deemed a worthy successor to either Laxman or Dravid. Anyway, a good cricket story after a long time.
Suresh menon is retarded.
Pujara can hardly pull and most definitely can't hook.
Dravid pulled beautifully & played the hook shot. How many Indian batsmen could even play the hookshot?
His real test will come against fast bowling on bouncy foreign wickets. Some thing tells me that he will be . May not hit double tons so often on away tours but he will be among the high scorers. He has a pretty good defence and is here to stay.
Why is T-20 relevant? Because, people don't know what is better, hitting a century in a T-20 match, or in a first class match like in India, spanning five days. I mean, scoring a century in a T-20 match in the IPL, against Lee, or Steyn, in 20 overs, is like scoring a Test double hundred. Pujara did, I believe, score a hundred in the I P L. That might be, why he was noticed. I am aware that Tendulkar scored a double hundred in O. D. I.'s but people might feel, he did it in T-20 international cricket.
As of now Cheteshwar Pujara is only a promising young batsman. Everyone should leave it at that. Comparing him to Rahul Dravid is unfair, both to Cheteshwar and to Dravid. Ditto with comparing him to Bradman.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT