A set of three photographs splashed recently across the front pages of Indian newspapers recall in chilling detail the horrific side of the ethnic war in Sri Lanka that ended in 2009. They are of Balachandran, the 12-year-old son of slain LTTE leader Velupillai Prabhakaran. The first two photos show the bare-bodied young boy forlornly sitting in a bunker munching on biscuits. In the third, he is lying dead on the ground, with bullet wounds on his chest. The photos, part of footage from a controversial documentary, No Fire Zone: Sri Lanka’s Killing Fields by British filmmaker Callum Macrae, suggest cold-blooded execution.
The Sri Lankan government claims the photographs are “doctored”. But Macrae told Outlook that he and his team have carefully “analysed and authenticated” the footage and are sure that the boy was killed not in a crossfire, as claimed by Colombo, but in cold blood.
Irrespective of whether they are doctored or not, the publication of the photographs has outraged most Indians, particularly those in Tamil Nadu, where there has been traditional support for the ‘Tamil cause’ as espoused by the Tamil Tigers of Sri Lanka. But if the LTTE’s ruthless tactics—leading to the death of many innocent people—had led to its marginalisation in Tamil Nadu politics in the past, the alleged execution of the young boy has successfully brought Tamil politicians of all hues together to rally against Sri Lanka.
The shocking photos of Balachandran
“The expose by the British filmmaker triggered the anti-Sri Lankan sentiments in Tamil Nadu,” says Chennai-based political commentator M.R. Venkatesh. The past weeks have witnessed a series of protests against Sri Lankan companies and assets in Tamil Nadu. The rising anger, which even led to attacks on Sri Lankan banks and airlines offices, forced CM J. Jayalalitha to take heed and announce that her state will not host the forthcoming Asian Athletics Meet to keep out participants from Sri Lanka.
The US-based Human Rights Watch has also published a report alleging rape and sexual assault on captured LTTE men and women in Sri Lankan army camps. The voting on the Sri Lanka-centric resolution is scheduled to be taken up on March 22. Attempts are being made by various parties, including Europe-based Tamil diaspora, to drum up support against Sri Lanka.
This has caused some chagrin. “The proposed resolution is uncalled for,” says Sri Lankan high commissioner in Delhi, Prasada Kariyawasam. “The Sri Lankan situation is not a matter for the UNHRC to discuss,” he says. He points out that Sri Lanka has taken steps towards reconciliation among different sections of society. “The wounds of the war will be healed gradually and it cannot be imposed from outside,” Kariyawasam says, adding that “any attempt to force the pace on Sri Lanka will only be counter-productive”.
On its part, Colombo has been consulting “like-minded” countries in the UNHRC to help them understand and appreciate steps it has taken to address the human rights issue. It claims much of the criticism has come from people who have not visited the country and are not aware of the ground reality.
A fair bit of that criticism is being generated from Tamil Nadu. The two main political parties—the opposition DMK and the ruling AIADMK—are in sync with the dominant mood. With elections a year away, no party can go soft on this emotive issue. Tamil MPs have met PM Manmohan Singh to ensure that India, like last year, votes against Sri Lanka to deliver a strong message against its human rights record.
Faced with irate Tamil Nadu MPs in Parliament, foreign minister Salman Khurshid tried to strike a balance between the popular mood and India’s strategic interests in Sri Lanka. “We may have anguish, we may have anger but we should not be saying that Sri Lanka is an enemy country,” Khurshid told members in Rajya Sabha on Wednesday. But the walkout by most members from Tamil Nadu showed they won’t relent on the pressure to take a tougher line against Colombo. Sections in Tamil Nadu even want an economic embargo on Sri Lanka.
But such a possibility also scares the business community in Tamil Nadu, which enjoys close trade links with Sri Lanka and has a substantial share of the $5-billion Indo-Lankan trade pie. “India’s Sri Lankan policy is going to harm Indian interests. Sri Lanka wants close ties with India but we are trying to push it away,” Somi Hazari, former president of the India-asean Chamber of Commerce and Industries, said.
Over the years Tamil Nadu, more than any other state, has benefited the most from close ties between the two countries. The 100-odd weekly flights from Tamil Nadu to the island nation are mostly full as the hour-long journey works in the interest of businessmen in both countries. Most Tamil Nadu businessmen admit that rising bilateral tensions would only harm their interest. “If we stop doing business there, the space will not remain vacant. It will be filled by Chinese and Pakistani businessmen,” says one of them.
But what does all this mean to the Indian vote on Sri Lanka in the coming days?
“I don’t think India will do anything different from what it did last year. We will vote yet again against Sri Lanka,” says former external affairs ministry secretary N. Ravi.
India’s vote last year had naturally caused major disappointment in Colombo, but the two countries have too much at stake and have invested heavily in the relationship. India is aware of the growing Chinese presence in Sri Lanka, but Sri Lanka too is aware that it cannot antagonise a close and powerful neighbour like India.
Therefore, a possible Indian vote against Sri Lanka in Geneva may be a continuing irritant in the bilateral relationship. But it is going to be one which both countries can live with.
Apropos the article Hiding the Machete (Mar 11), the Sri Lanka problem is Sinhala versus Tamil only if seen from a gross perspective. Actually it is an old rivalry between majority Buddhists and minority Hindu Tamils concentrated in the north and east. In Sri Lanka's history, Theravada Buddhism and Hinduism coexisted uneasily. Ancient Pali chronicles like the Mahavamsa, Deepavamsa, Kulavamsa and Poojavaliya vividly describe how repeated Hindu invasions from south India ravaged Buddhist culture and monuments in the island, and how Sinhala rulers repulsed the marauders. Indeed, waves of Tamil invasions drove the Sinhalese from Anuradhapura to Polonnaruna, and then finally to Kandy. Around AD 1000, the whole island was part of the Chola empire. Buddhists and, especially Buddhist monks, are thus the inheritors of an age-old hatred towards the Tamils.
why the hell, issue is being clubbed with LTTE?
it is about killings of civilians in thousands with impunity that too by 'legitimate' govt, in name of eliminating terrorism.
Ok, lets take your point that it's unavoidable. Why the hell lankan govt./rajapksa not giving autonomy or agree to 13th amendment suggested by india in 1987, NOW?
Lets take present, and its clear that Tamils are discriminated and subjugated, but people like you, love raking in unrelated issue, as none of pro-tamil or anti-lankan groups are espousing LTTE cause.
My lankan friends seem to think that this is a precisely timed move against Rajapakse by Tamil separatists who live in the 'west' esp the UK through 'useful idiots'.
As everyone should know, this alleged murder didn't happen under Rajapkse.
All violence is inhuman but LTTE were involved in bigger killings of TAMILS in SriLanka when they exterminated supporters of all other Tamil Groups like TELO, EPRLF, ENDLF etc. ----------------------------- SriLanka was protecting its own national interest by eliminating the violent terrorist group - LTTE. It is not that SRILANKA eliminated only LTTE but when Indian Army was in Srilanka in 1988-89, Srilankan Army eliminated the SINHALA MILITANCY- Janatha Vimukthi Perumana (JVP). Just GOOGLE Rohana Vijewere (the JVP founder) and read how mercilessly was he eliminated. -------------------- India also must deal with terrorist who kill innocent Indians on the streets of India the way SriLanka delt with JVP & LTTE.
The confrontations, aggression and violence came only from the Tamil racists, who exploited the issue to drag Jaffna deeper into mono-ethnic extremism. They succeeded in disguising their economic/class interests and promoting it as an act of discrimination against the Tamil-speaking communities. But history records that the language issue was driven aggressively only by the Tamil racists and not by the Tamil-speaking Indians, Muslims or the non-Vellahla Tamils of the east.
The aggression and violence of the Tamil racists proved the Marxian thesis that the ruling class will not give up power without a struggle. And true to the barbaric character of the Tamils they declared war on the rest of the nation by passing the Vadukoddai Resolution in 1976 – the period when Tamil supremacy was in its last legs.
They were the founders of the fascist culture in Jaffna. Despite the civilized veneer presented to the outside world the Tamils ran a fascistic regime reducing the depressed Tamils to slaves. Their cruel caste system has no other parallel in any other part of Sri Lanka. They virtually had a free run of the peninsula because the colonial rulers turned a blind eye to the subhuman Tamil culture of violence. Thesavalamai legitimized slavery and the Tamil slave-owners ruled the land with an iron fist, with the colonial administrators often refusing to interfere in the laws and customs of the ruling caste/class.
Thesa (land) walamai (laws and customs) legitimized the land-owning Tamils as the slave-masters of Jaffna. From feudal and colonial times until May 18, 2009 when the Tamil cult of violence sank in Nandikadal, Jaffna was under the jackboot of, first, Vellahla fascism followed, second, by their equally brutal fascists in the LTTE. Both groups oppressed and subjugated their own people and denied their victims the fundamental right to live with even a modicum of dignity and self-respect. The LTTE took over from where the Vellahlas left and perpetuated the cult of fascist violence which reduced the Jaffna Tamils to subhumans.
For Indians, everything is 'aaaall iizzzz weellll', as long as no one has been accused of rape, anywhere.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT