It was Friday evening, after the edit meeting, when the print editors go out to party and the web editor stoically goes back to work, when the phone rang.
“Dude, watch out, your URLs are on the list.”
Our business editor, calling from his sickbed, could barely suppress his glee. His was the first of the many calls that followed that evening about the now infamous ‘78 URLs’—73 of them about IIPM—that the DoT wanted Internet Service Licensees to block. Three of these 73 happened to be of blogs.outlookindia.com, the blogs section of Outlook website. One of these three was repeated and so, in effect, there were two of our URLs on this list.
It seemed they had already been blocked—we could not access them. Some of my colleagues mentioned that they had not been able to file new stories since 4 pm that day. The tech team that has run the website for over 13 years said they had never encountered something like this before. Then someone said that the entire blogs area was down too. Suddenly the penny dropped. We realised that some geniuses had blocked the entire blogs sub-domain and not just the specific URLs. Which is why when we tried changing its DNS to another IP address, it resulted in fresh blocks.
It seemed that we were the only ones singled out for this honour, for only the relevant URLs had been blocked for others. By then there was news that “the directive was issued on the basis of an order from a court in Gwalior”. It remained unclear which court in Gwalior had ordered what exactly, and of course why indeed our entire blogs were being blocked without any information to us. Then, suddenly, soon after 12:50 am on Saturday, equally inexplicably, everything was restored. The entire blogs area, including the two listed URLs. So, from being singled out as having our entire blog blocked, even the URLs sought to be blocked were now available.
It has been almost a week; the same questions remain. Had Medianama not leaked the list, and had the blocks been competently executed to the last URL, none of us would have come to know of any of this. As the accompanying story shows, DoT seems to be merrily going about clandestinely blocking many URLs without anybody being any the wiser, unless an order gets leaked. Wait, maybe I should go check that cover story we did on....
Sundeep Dougal is Editor, Outlook Websites; E-mail your columnist: sundeep AT outlookindia.com
Time to get a mole in DOT to give advance notice of blockings.
Height of hypocrisy, for a journalist to cry "blocking", while that is exactly what he does on his magazine all the time, on any views not sympathetic to his own bigotted views of the world.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT