The monorail versus metro rail debate was sparked off again last Saturday as India’s first monorail transport system made its debut in Mumbai. The train runs between Wadala and Chembur, an 8.8 km stretch which is part of a 19.54 km route opening to the public in August this year. Incidentally, when it opens, this will be the world’s second longest monorail corridor.
Meanwhile, as a host of states push for rapid transport systems in their cities, experts are divided as both forms of urban transport offer some solutions but not all. So even as the shiny new coaches ran their maiden run, the Mumbai metro project announced that Britain’s Transport for London would now assist in the construction of the first phase of the metro project.
The project has been plagued with problems since it started in 2008. The first phase (from Versova-Andheri-Ghatkopar) was supposed to be complete by 2013 but even the basic civil engineering work on the 11.4-km Andheri-Ghatkopar stretch is far from over. “The metro project in Mumbai has not been easy. We had two mosques and a temple in the way. However, once completed, it will provide immense relief to the city’s traffic,” says an official of the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) which is assisting Mumbai Metro.
On the debate over the two mass transport systems, he says, “Even in Delhi, we have the same debate and there are many takers for monorail.” Last year, urban development minister Kamal Nath voted for the monorail as it is “cheaper and requires less land”. But metro man E. Sreedharan pitches for his baby in big, populous Indian cities.
The sky-bus too had many advocates when it was first introduced but the project didn’t take flight due to stronger lobbying for metro and mono rail. Those who back the metro system say that while there are 20 monorail systems in Asia, more than 180 cities across the world use the metro system.
While the monorail is seen as more effective in densely populated areas, many feel it is better used as a feeder system to the main metro network. Also the metro can carry more people and runs at a faster speed than the monorail. On the other hand, the monorail is cheaper to build and operate.
Right now, different states have different plans. So while Mumbai is constructing the second largest mono rail in the world, Lucknow, Bangalore and Kochi are going with metro rail. Delhi has given its nod for the monorail with a funding pattern like the one for Delhi Metro. The project cost will be around Rs 2,235 crore for which an announcement is expected soon. Simultaneously, the DMRC will launch work on Phase IV. So looks like an integrated transport system which makes space for both mono rail and metro is the way ahead.
Not Over My Dead Body
Graves stop the Lucknow Metro
The proposed Lucknow metro rail project is literally facing a grave problem. Two nondescript, ASI-listed British cemeteries have come in the way of finalising the path for the tracks. Officials say these are just some graves of British soldiers killed in 1857, tucked away in a corner inside the crumbling structure. The ASI isn’t buying it for now, declining an NOC for metro tracks near the cemeteries in commercial hubs Kaiserbagh and Aminabad. Lucknow has 18 such cemeteries, many of the graves unmarked. The ASI has provisions for denotifying sites that have ‘lost historical relevance’, but for now it’s playing tough.
The type that provides more bribe will win.
Or is nt that obvious still?
On a normal railway, costs seem to be very economical, for the running of the train. The monorail has no railway junction, possibly. A train runs on a fixed track, which cannot move to accommodate other trains on a monorail system. The monorail could run on fuel, not electric. Perhaps this engine might be made economical. The monorail has no hazard to people not on the train, perhaps this perception prevails to a degree. This is equated to the same degree, when hazard to the train itself is pondered.
What is extremely unusual is, I feel my post on the railways is edited, and very strongly. It is exactly what I expressed in fact and matter, and nothing has been left out. It just appears, I couldn't have expressed in the very appropriate manner, because I am aware, that everyone except me, feel I am pretty vague.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT