Veteran economist Surjit Bhalla, writing in The Indian Express, has launched a vigorous campaign against any move to tax the super-rich. The rich, he argues, are already doing more than enough and taxing the rich would be akin to pissing in the wind.
But Mr Bhalla, it would seem, has missed the wood for the forest. Because the rich in India are neither paying any dividend tax nor any inheritance tax, nor any long-term capital gains tax for that matter. And judging by the dismal wealth tax collection, a laughable one thousand crore or so--which is not even one per cent of the estimated net worth of India’s richest Indian, Mr Mukesh Ambani--they are not paying the wealth tax either. In short, they are having a ball.
Because the super-rich do not depend on their salary and pay a piffling amount as income tax.
So, contrary to what Mr Bhalla is advocating, taxing the rich should have nothing to do with income tax at all.
An application under the Right to Information Act, filed by someone in Mumbai, sought to know how much income tax was paid by the Reliance Industries chairman , Mukesh Ambani. Not surprisingly, the Income Tax Department sent the request to Mr Ambani , since it involved ‘third party information’ and personal information to find out if he had any objection if the information was released by the department. And sure enough, Mr Ambani’s office wrote back to block the information.
Mr Ambani, like all other taxpayers, is perfectly within his rights to guard the amount he pays as income tax. But one does wonder why he has no objection to being hailed, year after year, as the richest Indian and his net worth estimated in US Dollars. Forbes does it every year and informs us that Mr Ambani’s net worth last year was over $ US two billion or approximately Rupees one lakh crore.
Nor does Mr Ambani seem to have a problem with a financial newspaper disclosing that he received Rs 2,700 crore by way of dividend in 2011-12 from Reliance Industries for his promoter’s shares. Since so much about his wealth is already in the public domain, one would have thought that he would not mind disclosing the income tax that he paid. Indeed, he did not mind letting the media know that he had voluntarily taken a 66 per cent cut in his salary. Media reports informed that while the Reliance Board had approved a salary of Rs 33 crore per annum for the chairman, Mr Ambani voluntarily opted to scale it down to Rs 15 crore.
What is, however, public knowledge despite Mr Ambani’s possible discomfort is that neither he nor his brother, Anil Ambani, figured among the top 200 income taxpayers of the country in the year 2007-08. Their mother, Kokilaben, however paid Rs 4.46 crore and was placed 195th in the list, according to a report in The Times of India ( 03/08/2008). Clearly the two brothers paid less income tax than their mother in that particular year.
The same report mentioned, however, that Mayawati, who went on to become the chief minister of Uttar Pradesh, had paid an income tax of Rs 26.26 crore, Shah Rukh Khan Rs 34.2 crore and even Sachin Tendulkar, cricketer, Naresh Trehan, the cardiologist and Mukul Rohatgi, the lawyer, paid income tax that ranged from Rs 4.85 crore (Rohatgi) to Sachin Tendulkar, who paid an advance tax of Rs 8.8 crore.
Another TOI report in 2010 provides the list of the top 10 income tax payers of the country till December, 2009, the last quarter. Sure enough, the Ambani brothers were conspicuous by their absence. Indeed, none of the ‘richest Indians’ made the list, which had two mine-owners from Odisha, K.S. Ahluwalia and Indrani Patnaik; another mine owner from Goa, Radha Timblo; and an industrialist from Mumbai, Mahesh Garodia.
The highest advance income tax till the last quarter that year, the report said, was Rs. 97 crore and was paid by Analjit Singh. Ahluwalia, Patnaik, Garodia and Timblo paid advance tax of Rs 46 crore, Rs 75 crore, Rs 39 crore and Rs 30 crore till that quarter.
There is of course a very good reason why the movers and shakers of Indian industry do not figure among the top income taxpayers. They derive their income from their investment, by way of dividend, for which they are not required to pay any tax at all. So, although a report in The Economic Times ( 16/09/2011) claimed that Azim Premji, Mukesh Ambani and Rahul Bajaj received dividend worth Rs 1,345 crore, Rs 1,241 crore and Rs 917 crore respectively, they paid no tax on this income. And assuming that Mukesh Ambani’s annual salary of Rs 15 crore is the highest among them all (Mr Premji apparently takes home a salary which is less than a crore and is said to be even less than his Chief Finance Officer), then they would probably have paid an income tax around Rs five crore each. We do know that Mr Ratan Tata, for example, paid an income tax of Rs 4.41 crore last year.
The dividend tax was withdrawn in 1997 by the then finance minister. It was replaced by a Dividend Distribution Tax to be paid by the companies. The rate of the Dividend Distribution Tax currently is 16 per cent, much lower than the highest income tax slab of 30 per cent. In other words, even those who receive several hundred or thousand crores by way of dividend, are indirectly taxed at the same rate as a small investor, who receives dividend worth ten or twenty thousand Rupees. Clearly, it is not fair. Economists, notably Surjit Bhalla, have questioned any attempt to further tax the super-rich as a futile, populist move on the ground that a higher income tax slab for the super-rich would yield very little additional revenue. They are right when they speak of a surcharge or a higher slab for income above Rupees one crore, for example. But the discourse on the tax paid by the super-rich cannot be allowed to be hijacked by such specious arguments. Because the super-rich are under-taxed in India because of the government’s reluctance to re-introduce the dividend tax, the inheritance tax and the long-term capital gains tax and its failure to collect adequate wealth tax.
Taxing the salary income of the super-rich, as illustrated earlier, is unlikely to be very meaningful. But even a 20 per cent dividend tax would have yielded over Rs 600 crore from just three of the richest Indians in 2011, namely Premji, Mukesh Ambani and Rahul Bajaj. And it would still have left a post-tax dividend income of approximately Rs 1,000 crore each for the first two and over Rs 700 crore for Mr Bajaj, not insubstantial amounts by any stretch of imagination. True, they are helping build the nation with their enterprise and investment, creating wealth and generating employment. But they do that with national resources like land, water, minerals and forests and with considerable hand-holding by the government by way of exemptions. It cannot be an argument against the re-introduction of the dividend tax, something that the finance minister is unlikely to do. He is far more likely to tax the super-rich at a higher rate, which would establish the government’s populist, socialist or inclusive credentials and will also keep the super-rich happy. But if opening up the economy has steadily added to the number of millionaires and billionaires in the country, they owe it to the people to contribute a lot more to the tax pool than they have been doing so far.
It is easy to be carried away by arguments which favour more tax from likes of Ambani and Premji. Yes, super-rich pay less tax in India but they also create jobs, which leads to huge tax collection.
In this connection let us not forget that abolition of estate duty was necessitated by poor collections of revenue and relatively high collection expenses. But if basic objective behind such an inheritance tax is reducing inequalities of wealth, it cannot be faulted. Making the rich pay more is easy but, as we have seen in the past, it leads to more tax evasion because it is easy to evade tax in our country. Further, is it not necessary to ensure that whatever tax revenue that is collected by the government is properly utilized? Citizens find that governments go on spending merrily and a good portion of government expenditure does not benefit the intended beneficiaries. The bureaucracy, in collusion with politicians, is in a position to get away with waste of public money. Thus, we must think twice before taxing the super-rich ix such taxation is going to encourage more tax evasion and consequently, there will be more problems.
As an alternative to estate duty, it may be possible to charge to tax income from inherited property at a rate which is say 20 per cent higher than normal tax. But here again the tax officials have to be very efficient and data base of the Income tax office has to be very effectively utilized.
Mukesh Ambani's net worth quoted by the author as $2 billion cant be correct because $2,000,000,000x54=Rs10,800,00,00,000=Rs10,800 Crores.
[1billion=100 crores, 1 trillion=100,000 crores=1 lakh crore, $/Rs ex. spot rate=apprx.54]
His net worth must be $20 billion to equate to apprx Rs.1.08 lakh crores, or Rs1.08 trillion.
It is very amusing to see our SOCIALIST LEFT LIBERAL INTELLECTUALS getting obsessed with Taxing Dividend income (from shares). Are you guys simply irrational or out of mind or totally illiterate?
Dividend Income is always discretionary and dividends are paid out of profits of any listed business, only out of the earned profits and they are also discretionary and done at the desire/mercy of the promoters/the governing board of the company.
If dividend income is taxed separately with taxation applying to incomes above a cutoff, the rich promoter shareholders who control the company will simply reduce dividend payout, divert profits into various pseudo charitable NGOs which inturn will spend it in friviolous ways. Big Corporate promoters and CEOs will find their own ingenious ways to enjoy the profits of company by sucking the company's profits through various accounting tricks and the losers will be small shareholders.
Remember that LIC , which is where crores of aam admi indians have invested money is itself a big recipent of dividend income from companies and any reduction in dividend payout will only hurt LIC and thus the aam admi. The socialist intellectual parasite class has long lost the ability to think rationally. UTTAM SENGUPTA is just one of them.
All democracies have to face the consequences of capitalism.We all know the consequences of communism.But we are all stubbornly made to accept the dangers of capitalism.It will be too long to write on this.Hence a few points.
In the nature of things all people are not created in the same way.They come out with different abilites and attitudes.They take on different roles in their life.Some go for business and succeed and others don't.But the rich cannot give up the riches and their postion of power and pride.Then they collude with the politicans to maintain their supremacy.They tweek the laws in their favor.They use idologies,religion,media etc to keep them on top.Democracies have not been able to stop this despite giving opportunities to people to risk and be enterprising.People need to keep watch on this but it is not happening due to plethera of factors.If keeping equality and social justice are the essential fuctions of the Govt then it will happen substantially if not wholly.
One good example is Norway.It has one of the highest taxes in the world at 48.5%.It ploughs all these taxes back in to society.Health and Education up to university level is free totally.The wages too are kept in check.The difference in wages of CEO and Manager is not allowed to be more than 25%.Everyone is happy.We all can draw lessons from these.
Though human beings are aware that giving away wealth is what can create justice they would not and only the Govt intervention in the name of taxes etc., can alleviate this.
Democracies give the power to elect the right persons and govern to provide social justice but people are complacent and have to bear the injustices.Money is power and power is money.Once this happens only a catastrophe can change.Our own averisousness is what leads to injustice and misery.
One specious argument that are done all over the world is that the rich people provide employment.Rich people hire because they need them.There is no businessman on earth who gives jobs just to help others.
Today in India there are 4 kinds of mafia are operating.The political mafia,the rich people mafia,the police and buracratic mafia and the Goonda mafia.Among all these the goonda mafia is the most honest as they do not claim to be doing any good to society and they are stating the truth!
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT