A half-Sindhi who cannot speak the language but is so viscerally affected by the emotional baggage of the Partition of 1947 that she gathers stories of her mother and relatives to put the loss into perspective—that would be one way of describing this book. Aggarwal challenges the Sindhi stereotype of loud-mouthed, flashy, papad-eating people with paunchy ‘saeens’ and diamond-dusted women. She chooses to recount inspiring stories instead of the expedience of reconstructing cliched Sindhi identities.
The book is an assimilation of pre-Partition memories and post-Partition dilemmas of the author’s mother Situ Savur, aunts, uncles, grandparents and family friends who significantly influenced the Savur family’s resettlement in India. Each goes through an emotional struggle to retain a strand of Sindhi roots, yet willingly enlists in the larger task of becoming global citizens, even if that means shaving off some aspects of identity.
Some insights in the book will undoubtedly evoke a sense of nostalgia in the engaged reader, as will peculiar Sindhi names like Putli and Hotu, which find no favour in contemporary naming games. The caste consciousness of Sindhis, for instance, which has seldom found its way into mainstream discourse; the ambivalence in attitudes towards Muslims that lingers till today; the emphasis on rarely used Sindhi words and recipes, a dip into cultural practices of rural Sindh—all this evokes feelings of longing and loss. As a researcher, Aggarwal has done excellent work. She has dug up songs and couplets, old pictures from family albums, postcards, maps, sketches depicting native peculiarities, images of old bazaars, even the Scinde Dawk of 1852, India’s first adhesive postage stamp issued by Sir Bartle Frere, the East India Company administrator of the province of Sindh.
As a second-generation refugee, raised on a diet of Sindhi stories by parents who never tided over the sadness of losing the motherland, I find the emotions that propel Aggarwal’s book worthy of applause. Yet, at another level, the book disappoints. It is too scattered. The stories are personal; they open up multiple, bewildering labyrinths of relationships and subconnections, throw up dozens of names, making each account distracting after a few initial paragraphs. Too many disparate details, turns and U-turns of memory and circumstance reduce them to diary notings instead of elevating them to compelling accounts that feed into a poignant narrative of the Partition experience.
A few sections are oddly titled: ‘Pasture’, ‘Tapestry’, ‘Allegory’, ‘Ballad’, ‘Rainbow’, even ‘Vivisection’. Few, if any, live up to their themes. They start purposefully, then drift away. Wistful pre-Partition stories collide into the psychosis of the post-Partition phase, poetry comes up alongside food and drink recipes, history fades into geography, linguistic nuances sit juxtaposed with notes on cultural practice; anything comes up anywhere. For the reader, instead of being gripping, the Partition experience slips away like sand through fingers. If emotions, ideas, planning and writing are the stages a book goes through, this is a jumble of them all. Last week, at the Jaipur Literature Festival, in a session titled ‘India Becoming: A Portrait of Life in Modern India’, author Pico Iyer commented that writing was more about structure than content. This book demonstrates why.
Germany has museums to remember the heritage of Jews who were uprooted out of the country and killed during WW2.
Since Pakistan is a FASCIST THEOCRACY , It is India which should open a new center to document and preserve the heritage of the Sindhi Hindus, who ended up as 100% losers in the project of Partition - they lost their homeland (pakistan) despite being a powerful big minority and they did not get their own state in India in return . Something must be done by Secular India to remind the world of how a non secular nation across our borders has done a Genocide of an entire group by stealth.
I don't exactly stereotype the Sindhi in the manner portrayed. How the 'Dhamaal' is associated with Sindh, and also Shiva, and how Mr. Advani is also Sindhi, is really fascinating.
And we want to replicate the same here : )
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT