Their nose for slights, real and imaginary, and quest for bloody retribution has ensured an unbroken stream of sectarian violence that has so ruptured Pakistan’s polity and civic life. But the ‘insane jehad brigade’ has never had such an incendiary issue served on a platter from across the border. A palpable sense of ‘didn’t we tell you so?’ permeates every extremist utterance ever since Union home minister Sushilkumar Shinde publicly claimed that the BJP and its parent organisation RSS run terrorist camps and were behind the terror attacks on Samjhauta Express, Ajmer Sharif, Mecca Masjid and Malegaon.
Understandably, Shinde’s remarks created a furore on Pakistani streets. But for people following Indian affairs, ‘Hindutva terrorism’ isn’t new, as it has been extensively reported in the Indian media. It was the timing of Shinde’s remark—so soon after tension at the LoC—that intrigued Pakistanis. Officialdom here brushed it aside as ‘domestic politics’, only renewing its demand that those behind the 2007 Samjhauta Express attack, which killed 67 Pakistanis, should be brought to justice. Others read Shinde’s sudden lunge at the BJP as an early Congress jab at the 2014 Lok Sabha elections, with the obvious objective of reaching out to Muslim voters.
Shinde’s comments, perceived in Pakistan as an acknowledgement, even a ‘confession’, of a corrosive internal problem, is not an isolated incident. It comes just weeks after the Pakistani chief of army staff General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani said that the ‘enemy number one’ was the prevailing internal threat, and not India. This from a man who, in his first term, told Outlook that he was ‘India-centric’ because it was the neighbour’s ‘capability’, not its ‘intentions’, that worried him.
Beseiged as it is with issues existential and legislative—a firebrand cleric breathing down its neck, the PM charged with serious corruption and impending elections—it was a rare occasion for Pakistan’s parliament to focus on India. Shinde’s statement prompted PML(N)’s Chowdhury Nisar to warn the lower house that regarding the internal threat as paramount can compromise Pakistan’s security. He demanded that Pakistan circulate copies of Shinde’s comments in the UN Security Council. Foreign minister Hina Rabbani Khar replied, “We are very much aware of the challenges emanating from eastern borders but must not be delusional about the challenges within Pakistan”.
Former ISI chief General Hameed Gul says that Shinde was compelled to make the remarks at the behest of PM Manmohan Singh, who had to deflect attention from statements hurled by his bellicose military chiefs threatening war on Pakistan during the crisis on the LoC.
“This is the first time that any state has declared an opposition party a terrorist organisation. Manmohan knows that his military chiefs tried to take their nation to war when both sides are nuclear powers. This must be the first time that the Indian army and air force chiefs held press conferences; they believe in limited offensives against Pakistan in a nuclear environment,” Gen Gul said.
Pakistani defence analyst Shireen Mazari finds it significant that such serious charges are levelled against the BJP—one of the two major Indian political parties. In Pakistan, none of the parties espousing religious extremism have even come close to achieving electoral majority.
“In India, the BJP was in power earlier and is a major contender in the next elections. As it has now been identified as being a direct trainer of saffron terrorism, imagine the threat to peace if the BJP comes to power. For all those Western states who drum up fear about Muslim extremists taking control of Pakistan’s nuclear assets—a total improbability—they should look to the possible electoral success of the BJP in India, which would give saffron terrorists direct access to India’s nuclear arsenal, especially if Narendra Modi was to be India’s prime minister,” warns Mazari.
Former foreign secretary and India expert Riaz Khokar said, “The Congress party leadership, especially the home minister, should be congratulated for his statement regarding saffron terrorism. The international community, especially the US, should take note of his comments. The UN Secretary General should also place this statement before the Security Council,” he says.
No one is more delighted by Shinde’s comments than the man who has a $10 million bounty on his head but walks tall in the towns of Punjab. Speaking at Jamaat-ud-Dawa’s headquarters at Chauburji in Lahore, Lashkar-e-Toiba founder Hafiz Mohammed Saeed demanded that India be declared “a terrorist state” by the UN Security Council.
“We demand that the UN immediately ban these organisations, as they were involved in an attack on the Samjhauta Express and other terrorist acts in India. India tried to involve us in the Mumbai attacks, but after a passage of five years, nothing has been established against us in the courts. Our government often protects Indian interests and its stance on such issues is apologetic. I ask the Pakistan army chief to fulfil his duty and give his reaction on this issue,” he said.
Some experts advocate using the recent ‘confession’ to open an old can of worms. “Their own reports say there are 234 terrorist organisations in India, but since they are not involved in cross-border terrorism, not much attention is given to them. Around 20 per cent of the territory in the so-called ‘red corridor’ is with Maoist militants. This is the right time for Pakistan to aggressively engage the UN on Kashmir,” says Gen Gul.
One of Pakistan’s main opposition parties, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), also welcomed Shinde’s comments. Like others here, they saw it as an acknowledgement of the presence of Hindutva terror groups in India. “Samjhauta Express is one example, but there are other instances that prove their involvement in massacres in both Gujarat and Mumbai,” said Shafqat Mehmud, PTI’s central information secretary.
Both Pakistan and India appear to be confronting the worrisome reality of home-grown terrorists bent on serious mischief. Mazari says some of the blame can be laid at the door of bad governance and poverty.
For now, Pakistan is largely relieved—Shinde’s statement gives a certain parity between the two nations in their acknowledgement of one of the toughest challenges they face.
Pakistan has Rehman Malik, we have Sushilkumar Shinde (Bombs In Our Houses, Feb 4). Miles ahead of anyone else in opening his mouth without engaging his brain.
[[Samjhauta Express, Ajmer, Hyderabad, Jalna, Purna, Margoo, Malegaon, Nanded, Tenkasi, Thana, Nagpur, Kanpur, Modasa, Panvel, Hubli, Goa.]]
Have any Hindu terrorists been convicted in any of the blasts you mentioned above? The responsibility for the Samjhauta blasts has also been claimed by some Paki terrorists. You are eager to pin it on Hindus because that would give you a reason to claim some sort of parity between extremists from both religions.
The fact remains that Muslim terrorists have been caught and convicted in several terrorist incidents in India, something that cannot be said about Hindu terrorists.
>> "isolated stray alleged incidents of violence by some Hindus."
Count the number of blasts: Samjhauta Express, Ajmer, Hyderabad, Jalna, Purna, Margoo, Malegaon, Nanded, Tenkasi, Thana, Nagpur, Kanpur, Modasa, Panvel, Hubli, Goa.
Your track record of constantly attempting to draw parallels and create bogus parity between SYSTEMIC global murderous Islamic fascism (as exemplified by near total elimination of minorities not only in Bangladesh and Pakistan but in Kashmir in the so called secular India) with isolated stray alleged incidents of violence by some Hindus (possibly as a result of frustration arising from rampant bullying and harassment of Hindus in their own land) is ample testimony of your real intent which is to give succour to your comrades in the frontline of their global crusade of domination.
Home Ministers: Shinde / Rehman Malik
Foreign Ministers: Salman Khurshid / Hina Rabbani Khar
The famed Indo-Pak rivalry with a difference - this time its looks like trying to out perform each other in choosing the most incompetent ministers. Hilarious but the tragedy is that it is the common folk who are suffering.
Shinde’s terror charge sparks advice, gloating, ACTION PLANS in Pakistan ' Mariana Baabar
ACTION PLAN No 1 :
Rehman Malik Interior Minister has sent an advise (most probably followed by an Official Advisory if we don't act ) to provide Security Cover to Shah Rukh Khan .
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT