The Delhi Police is in the news once more--after the Baba Ramdev episode-- for the wrong reasons. I am a staunch admirer as well as its bitter critic. The force has performed remarkably well on the dignitary protection front and maintenance of public order. But its handling of sensational crime, especially the one against women, has often been controversial and lacking in credibility. The December 16 gang rape has put Commissioner Neeraj Kumar and his men on the mat. The latest charge --one levelled by the 28-year-old software engineer who was with the girl-- is that there was culpable delay in taking the hapless girl to hospital.
The criticism of the Delhi Police by a cross-section of the public and the media however conveniently ignores the fact that the force was amazingly quick to identify the aggressors and bring them to book. To cap it all the charge-sheet against the six the accused has been laid in court in record time. This positive response, quite uncharacteristic of the Indian Police, is however unlikely to appease public opinion which is convinced that the Delhi Police was ham handed in the case. It is alleged to be insensitive and negligent whenever it comes to sexual crimes against women. However unreasonable such a perception of a principal law enforcement agency might be, what goes against the police is its track record of corruption and brutality. It would take decades for the police to overcome this unsavoury reputation because police recruitment is mired in corruption and training is nominal and superficial. The situation is exacerbated by the fact that older and older candidates are coming into the IPS, and many of these seek the good life in preference to hard field work to take care of problems like attacks on the weaker sections of society. This is why solid community endeavour is far more effective than a blind dependence on law enforcement agencies.
The key question is: could this rape and murder have been averted by a more sensitive and humane police force? The emphatic answer is “No”. Crimes of passions are dictated by opportunities and momentary impulses which are hardly contained by the fear of law or penalty. Having said this, I would like to hasten to put the record straight. The current widespread lack of fear of law resulting from police apathy and favouritism fuelled by the political masters of the police certainly explains what happened in this recent case. The well known fact that in India, you cannot get a case registered in any police station across the country without greasing the palms of the Station House Officer and his staff makes male predators smug that they could buy their way through freedom even if they get caught following a rape. It is this weakness in the system that persuades me to believe that women will continue to be major victims of crime in India in the years to come.
A death sentence to the rapist is emotionally appealing. Its impact on criminality cannot however be sustained. All those who have jumped into the bandwagon are being impulsive, and they hardly realize that capital punishment enhances the degree of proof which Courts require to convict an offender. The current rate of failure of rapes all over the country bears testimony to this. We could be witness to more acquittals of confirmed rapists when death sentence becomes one of the options available to the Judge, a development that would definitely encourage violence on women rather than reverse it.
Notwithstanding this cynicism I would opt for a number of measures that would fortify physical security for women, especially in public places. CCTV coverage should be expanded, provided there are well trained staff to monitor stations which will have to be set up in public premises. Such a tool has greatly helped to prevent crime on the streets of London as also nab offenders who ignore public cameras and still commit crime.
Total segregation of the sexes in public offices and educational institutions is difficult and preposterous. A generous sprinkling of policemen and policewomen in crowded railway stations, religious places, cinema houses and hospitals is not a bad idea at all, provided you have enough resources and you are willing to persevere with them. Training of young women in martial arts could also help.
In a huge country like ours the main problem is however one of numbers. How are we going to cover such a large geography and a mind boggling population? This is where the practicality of all these measures, however well conceived, is highly suspect.
Public expectation of protection by the police is enormous, despite the abysmally poor reputation of Indian police forces. Whether the police will respond substantially is anybody’s guess. A lot will depend on the IPS leadership There are dedicated men and women in the service. Whether they would like to soil their hands fighting against intruders is a big question. One thing is certain. There is no place for politics here. Political parties will have to sink their differences and cooperate in taking part in the exercise in making our roads safe, something that the father of the nation yearned for.
R.K. Raghavan is a former CBI Director.
> "The criticism of the Delhi Police by a cross-section of the public and the media however conveniently ignores the fact that the force was amazingly quick to identify the aggressors and bring them to book."
Something Mr. Raghavan's SIT miserably and willfully failed to do in Gujarat.
Given the history of Indian police to beat and lock up a bunch of guys, when under political or public pressure to hasten investigation, how is anyone to believe that the aggressors identified by the Delhi police are genuinely the offenders in this case? What India needs is forensic investigators, and a sophisticated crime investigation branch. Not claims of speedy detective work based on forced confessions and police torture.
Mr. Raghavan is deeply regarded in police circles. I would like to share, that there are people who are living on the roads paid for by the taxpayer, and exactly, on the footpath bordering the roads. These people aren't seen as any social problem by the people, because they aren't. People on the footpath, are seeing their interaction with others, in the singular. They blame not people, nor society for their circumstance. They are generally, not lawless. The interesting part is, they are living in the footpath, with this mindset. Now, in the 'Red Belt', if the people in the 'Red Belt' came to the city, they would have the same mentality. In the tribal inhabited areas, people were saying that humans are persecuted, because they are associated with their surroundings, which are valuable, and which need to be exploited. What if the govt. wanted no people in the footpath, and thought them to be a law and order situation?
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT