General (retd) V.K. Singh’s recent allegation against the Indian army yet again underscores his lack of judgement and tact. But this is only the latest in a series of episodes where he has deliberately courted controversy. The ex-army chief’s conduct in office, particularly his decision to take the government to court and his attempt to torpedo the appointment of his successor, did considerable damage to the army’s institutional ethos. Having shed the uniform, the general has sought to reinvent himself as a star muckraker and scourge of all the ills afflicting the country. As a citizen, he is of course free to play any role in public life. But as a former service chief, he is the custodian of a tradition that has its own demands. In any case, is the tack taken by him really worthy of his expertise and standing? Take, for instance, his claim that the government had lost its legitimacy and that Parliament ought to be dissolved. Apart from the contempt that it displays for our political institutions, it raises important questions. Could the general’s views have been all that different when he was in office just a few months ago? Doesn’t it suggest a disturbing lack of allegiance to the principle of democratic control of the military?
Even by his own rights, such sensationalism is unlikely to be useful. If the general does seek a big-bang entry into politics, he would do well to consider other successful examples of soldiers. US Gen Douglas MacArthur basked in the warmth of public adulation after being sacked by President Harry Truman, but the soldier who got the Republican nomination for presidency in the next election was the low-key Dwight Eisenhower. When it came to real politics, the Republicans went with a soldier who demonstrated constructive leadership in public life and had a record of being a consensus-builder. This is as it should be. Gen Singh, however, seeks to carry over into public life the peremptory style of a military commander—now deployed in an agitational mode. This is hardly a recipe for success in democratic politics.
The general could have played a more useful role by instigating debate and educating opinion on issues where he has the requisite experience. It is well known, for instance, that while in office Gen Singh was unhappy with the state of our defence preparedness. Why not take this issue forward in the public domain? The general is particularly well-placed to spur such a discussion, not least because of his experience in thinking through the military challenges presented by a rising China. Instead, he’s embraced causes on which he’ll be hard-pressed to hold his own in a public forum. Sadder still is the ex-chief’s attempt to besmirch the institution that he led not so long ago. The treatment of the major by Gen Singh’s family was disgraceful. Far from apologising to the officer, the general has called for an inquiry. There is something bizarre about an ex-chief suffering from a persecution complex. Above all, it is ironic that Gen Singh thinks nothing of humiliating a brother officer whilst grandly espousing the ‘aam aadmi’ cause.
A former infantry officer, Srinath Raghvan is fellow at Centre for Policy Research. E-mail your columnist: srinath DOT raghavan AT gmail DOT com
Apropos Srinath Raghavan’s Jump Cut (No Aam Aadmi), it is painful to see some elements in the army, retired or serving, regard the blatant corruption at its top levels and the conspiracy of silence surrounding the sleaze as part of its “institutional ethos”.
Is this a paid article. Lousy reading.
What is sadder, is this poor joke of a post.
Do you actually believe that your credibility goes up with such posts?
The gentleman is a prominent citizen. He is among Ms. Kiran Bedi, and Mr. Kejriwal, and Mr. Hazare. The angst seems to point to a general cause. Even people like the persons mentioned, have to need to voice concern. It is also, that our political and government-administrative leaders have the need to voice concern, apart from acting.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT