A bitter battle is brewing on Capitol Hill. Chuck Hagel’s confirmation as the next defence secretary of the United States boils down to this litmus test: does he support Israel, understand the threat posed by Iran and is he sorry for past remarks that his critics say were borderline anti-Semitic? Even before President Barack Obama nominated Hagel this week for the top job at the Pentagon, critics of the former Republican senator from Nebraska had launched a full-throated campaign against the nomination.
As a senator in 2006, Hagel had infuriated the powerful pro-Israel lobby when he refused to sign a letter urging the European Union to designate the Iran-backed Shia militant group Hezbollah as a terrorist organisation. His explanation of his decision only made matters worse.
“In the Arab and Muslim world, the terminology of a ‘Jewish lobby’ conjures up conspiratorial theories, exaggerated notions of Jewish power and, frankly, anti-Semitism,” says Rabbi Abraham Cooper, associate dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, a leading Jewish human rights organisation. “When you take that together with, ‘I’m not an Israeli senator,’ he obviously has a problem which we would like for him to address head on in an open and public way,” the rabbi adds.
The Emergency Committee for Israel has led the organised criticism of Hagel. It launched a website, www.chuckhagel.com, on which it urged visitors to tell senators: “Chuck Hagel is too extreme to be secretary of defense.”
The Senate must confirm Hagel before he can take up his new job across the Potomac River from the White House. Many fellow Republican senators have been vocal in their opposition to Hagel. Among them is 2008 Republican presidential nominee John McCain, who says he has “serious concerns about positions Hagel has taken on a range of critical national security issues in recent years.” However, McCain’s Democratic colleague, Carl Levin, who is Jewish, says Hagel is well qualified for the Pentagon job and that lawmakers would give “careful consideration” to his nomination.
Patricia Marcus, director of the Asia Pacific Institute at the American Jewish Committee, also predicts a thorough vetting by senators of Hagel’s record—to glean his vision for the future. “We want to make sure, based on his answers at the confirmation hearings, where he stands on Israel and his support for the (Obama) administration’s Iran policy,” she says.
The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the powerful and well-funded pro-Israel lobby group in Washington, has been conspicuously absent from the line-up of Hagel’s critics. Its explanation for its silence is that it does not take positions on presidential nominations.
Hagel has been criticised by the left for making disparaging remarks about a gay American diplomat in 1998. He has apologised and the criticism died down amidst an acknowledgement that the discourse in America on gays has evolved dramatically over the past 15 years.
The choice of Hagel, a Republican, is by itself an unusual one for a Democratic president. Some see it as a smart one for that reason. “By nominating a Republican as his secretary of defence, Obama now has a tangible example of an act of bipartisanship on his part,” says a Senate staffer, speaking on background. “The Republicans in Congress have to decide: do they oppose a fellow Republican and appear less willing to compromise than the president?”
Hagel had quietly weathered the criticism until this week. Then, in an exclusive interview with the Lincoln Journal Star of Nebraska, he said he was astounded by the distortion of his record, an accurate assessment of which would prove he has been in “unequivocal, total support for Israel”. The fact is that there is “not one shred of evidence that I’m anti-Israeli, not one (Senate) vote that matters that hurt Israel”, he added.
Obama has had a rocky relationship with the Pentagon over his intent to wind down the war in Afghanistan. Gen Stanley McChrystal, the former top US commander there, writes about a “deficit of trust” between the White House and the Pentagon in his autobiography, released this month. The cause of this tension was a difference over troop levels: the general wanted more troops, the president less.
“The military is facing a greater challenge with the Obama administration when it comes to the residual (troop) presence in Afghanistan,” says Jeffrey Dressler, a senior research analyst at the Institute for the Study of War.
While nominating Hagel, a Vietnam War veteran, Obama praised him for his courage, judgement and willingness to speak his mind, “even if it wasn’t popular, even if it defied the conventional wisdom”. Hagel’s critics, on the other hand, offered him a shot at redemption—through a symbolic conforming. “An apology would go a long way toward addressing the concerns of the Jewish community,” said Rabbi Cooper.
Marcus of the AJC acknowledged that the former senator’s controversial comments were made many years ago. “Certainly, people do evolve,” she said. “We want to know where he stands today.”
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT