The 18th Congress of the Communist Party of China, which ends today, will lay down the framework of China's future leadership. The change of leadership in China could only bring positive changes in Sino-Indian ties, not vice versa. For the new generation of Chinese leaders the most pressing and also ticklish challenge could be— at the internal level— on social management and social construction. At the external level it would be on the management of Sino-US relations, settlement of maritime disputes and safeguarding sea-rights in the west-Pacific region-which will be the most geo-strategic focus of China's new leadership.
Under such circumstance, China's new generation of leadership, for the next 10 years or so, would try to stabilize and further improve Sino-Indian relations to make their Strategic Partnership more substantial. This is especially important in dealing with shaping the world's new economic order and the Asia-Pacific region. Both China and India have enough reasons and areas to cooperate for their mutual benefit. The global economic crisis and its concomitant economic recession are still disturbing the world. It is an historic responsibility and opportunity for both China and India to work jointly to rejuvenate the world economy. They have the capacity and the world also expects them to do so. It is in this sense that Sino-Indian relations goes beyond their bilateral capacity and gather global and strategic significance. Of course, challenges that China and India face in the next 10 years may still disturb their bilateral relations. But their relations will be much different from what it was in the past and also from what it is at present.
The border issue is one that may create disturbance in Sino-Indian ties. The two governments will have to find new approaches to address each other's concerns and even, sometimes, lower tensions along their disputed border. The 'sovereignty dispute' could be put aside further, if they seek common developments and interactions in border regions that are "not so disputed" to create favourable local conditions and environment for the final settlement. But in any case, in the next 10 years, the border issue has no chance of holding the bilateral relations hostage.
On the factor of a third party—even if India may become less concerned over China's relations with Pakistan, China may be a little worried about India-US relations and India's interactions with American allies in the Asia-Pacific region, stretching from the Arabian Sea to Northwest Asia. The USA will certainly try to put more resources in the Asia-Pacific region to balance China. India's policy towards US's China-oriented Asia-Pacific strategy would make a big difference to the "Great Game" here.
If persistent lobbying by the US convinces India that building 'semi-alliance' relations with the US would allow it to achieve more strategic benefits than maintaining equal distance between US and China and maintaining strategic independence, then Delhi may possibly join the US in checking China. But that would be a major setback in Sino-Indian relations.
The trade imbalance issue would become less and less important in Sino-Indian relations. This is because India has begun, and will continue, to make unremitting efforts in developing its manufacturing capacity and its infrastructure through further economic reforms and by inviting foreign capital, including from China. The transitions in the two societies and economies would make Sino-Indian economic relations more comprehensive and healthier.
The Tibet issue could create a major disturbance in the next 10 years because of Dalai Lama's old age. If something happens to Dalai Lama before the Tibet issue is resolved in line with the expectations of the exiled Tibetan community, there could be chaos within and beyond the Tibetan region. This could create trouble in Sino-Indian relations because India still hosts nearly one lakh Tibetans. How to deal with the Tibetan issue in a post- Dalai Lama era could become a ticklish issue for the leaders of China and India.
The issue of water resources could also loom large in the coming years. Delayed monsoon in recent years with less rainfall has already brought severe damage and loss for India. This makes Himalayan river waters more important for India's economy and social life. What makes it worse is the fact that China itself is a country facing severe water-shortage. But because of the unsettled border dispute there is limited cooperation between China and India in this area.
As for competing for regional influence, this potential challenge could become an opportunity for cooperation for China and India, depending on whether their regional strategy is inclusive or exclusive. For China, as long as India keeps away from the sovereign disputes between China and its maritime neighbours and does not get involved in West-Pacific region, its looming influence is welcome. This is because India's presence would give confidence to the smaller neighbours in dealing with China. More importantly, a stable Asia-Pacific needs India's constructive presence. The future strategic scenario in this region, therefore, should be multi-polar.
The same way China expects India to treat Chinese presence in the sub-continent and in the Indian Ocean and its rim land. China is increasingly becoming dependent on the Indian Ocean route for its energy and trade. China's entry into the Indian Ocean and its rim is to secure the safety and development of its overseas properties through cooperation. It has neither the intent nor the resources to compete with India or the US for dominance in Indian Ocean. But one should not expect China to go away from the Indian Ocean either.
Moreover, being a big power like India, China is expected by many countries to provide security in the troubled waters in areas of the West Indian Ocean. But the challenge for China and India is to overcome the deep mistrust between them. India is upset over the "String of Pearls" strategy of China; a coinage of an American intern of international politics, while China is concerned over India's so called "string of diamonds" strategy in the Indian Ocean to restrict Chinese activities there. What is more worrying is that the two countries don't have any strong functional institution to discuss their overlapping interests in this region. This could pose a big challenge for China and India in the coming years. However, in the foreseeable future China and India relations are likely to be on the right track because of the common ground leaders of the two countries have identified and agreed upon.
The two countries believe that through "reconciliation, both benefit, while through belligerence, both lose." This is because both countries have the capacity for "mutual destruction." Leaders of both countries also believe the world is large enough to accommodate China and India and there are enough areas for the two countries to cooperate. China and India tend to see each other's rise as an opportunity and not a threat. Both countries believe they have the capacity not only to change the world but also this planet's appearance. They also regard their bilateral economic relations as a factor of stability in Sino-Indian relations.
Based on these common grounds Sino -Indian relations could become more mature and rational in the coming years. Moreover, China's focus will be increasingly inward and eastward for which it will need a more stable and healthy relation with India. This would allow China to concentrate more on a balanced development at home and put more of its resources to deal with its problems in the West Pacific region. Simply put, China will need more cooperation with India in the coming years than it did in the past.
Hu Shisheng is Director of the Institute of South & Southeast Asian and Oceania Studies, China Institute for Contemporary International Relations (CICIR)
India’s border dispute with China is quite old. Of late China has raised border disputes with its other neighbours too. The increasingly strained relations with Japan are a pointer to China’s aggressive ways as regards its neighbours. We have to wait and watch to see how the just appointed Chinese premier and CPC President deal with neighbours and whether they adopt a sensible approach to handle relations with neighbours as otherwise China’s economic agenda would be adversely impacted.
There is at least one common area where both countries could contribute without any apparent ' loss of face' or ' exchange of territory'. The rampant corruption.
KEL says at 11.44 " China is going to go down in the next 10 years;"
KEL says at 11.28 PM : " Perhaps, this time it will be China that will colonise India! "
Boss any doctor nearby ??
Everyone has to understand, that for every reason, the opposite reason exists, and importantly, there seems to be no reason, behind the reason, and it's opposite. Why is the U. S. A. worried about terrorism? Because people find that they cannot understand, why they have to become terrorists, both the U. S. A. and the terrorists. There seemed to be a reason given, to attack the U. S. A., by the terrorists, according to the U. S. A., but the reason didn't hold with the same nation. The U. S. A. is not antagonistic towards religion. To them, they were being attacked for no reason. That is why, they said they feel, that terrorism is a phenomenon that is prominent to perception, and they feel that it will continue, because they cannot change the perception they are against religion, when they are not. To be fair, President Obama is a nice person, but can one person make a difference? The Indian P. M. Indira Gandhi was assassinated, because of how some people felt she was trying to influence religion. I suspect, people felt that she was influencing the Sikh religious committee in a certain manner. Or, perhaps, not. It seemed, that the militants and the government just made the situation tragic for people. I hope I have not been very candid, unnecessarily. I admired Indira Gandhi, and thought she was going to win the next election, which was close. I think the Sikh religion expresses God, in a manner which people love and revere. This was a great tragedy.
The article sets a positive tone. The points it makes are sensible.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT