Last May when CM Jayalalitha took over, she promised that she would clean up the power mess within three months. At the time the demand-supply gap was 3000 mw. Just last week, in a televised address on Jaya TV, the CM said load-shedding will ease in the state, which needs 12000 mw, by November-end. This week she pleaded with the people to “bear with me” because she intends to resolve the shortage by the end of next year. “You have waited so far. Wait for one more year, the state will manage 4,385 mw. It may not even take one year. Wait till June, 2013 and bear with me,” she told the assembly.
The demand-supply gap is at 4000 mw and bound to increase because power usage is going up, partly because her government is giving out more power-intensive appliances like grinders, mixers and fans. It’s a moot point whether people should believe her when she keeps on setting deadlines to ease the power situation and fails to keep them. And now of course the centre has added its own burden— by restricting gas cylinders to six a year— because it has encouraged people to buy induction stoves which work on electricity. So more consumption.
“We will achieve our goal. We have already moved past the worst days. Tamil Nadu will become a power-surplus state,” she said while her MLAs applauded. “We are fighting globally, not locally,” points out an entrepreneur Chandu Nair who refers to costs going up— some of them unintended (for instance, courier costs for the transportation of goods because they could not be made on time as a result of poor power). And in the global market, an investor is going to be wary of TN and is not bothered about whether DMK caused the power crisis or the AIADMK.
Blame the DMK
If all else fails, blame the DMK. And that’s what Jayalalitha has been doing repeatedly.
For the record, the CM says that the DMK regime only added 206 mw of installed capacity between 2006 -2011. Had Karunanidhi's government carried on the projects initiated by her previous regime (2001-2006) with the same level of urgency, many would have been commissioned when he was in power, she claimns and accuses the former CM M. Karunanidhi of having “deliberately reduced” power generation so that he could “buy high cost power for selfish reasons.”
The DMK government’s failure to enter into Case-1 bidding with other states for power purchase and the centre’s failure to provide a transmission corridor exacerbated the problem. “The centre gives priority only to states that had secured Case-1 bidding,” she says. As per Case-1 bidding, a state would get power for the price at the time of agreement even after 10 years. According to Jayalalitha, the short-term power purchase agreements signed by the DMK government had caused enormous loss. In addition, although TN had signed purchase agreements with other states, it could get only 85 mw because of the non-availability of transmission corridor.
In contrast, during her first term(1991-1996), the capacity addition was 1,302 megawatt (MW) and in the second(2001-2006) , it was 2,518 MW. In that case how come there was load shedding even when Karunanidhi was in power?
Jayalalitha's litany of woes includes having to approach the Supreme Court since the state’s plea for allocation of 1,721 MW from Delhi between November 1 and March 31, 2013 was rejected. The centre’s 'betrayal' included not responding positively to her letter to the PM seeking the entire 1,000 mw to be produced in the first unit of the Kudankulam Nuclear Power Project (KKNPP). The centre was also making it difficult to set up new power projects because on paper it was supplying only 80 per cent of the coal agreed through the Fuel Supply Agreement.“But what we receive is only 70 per cent from Coal India Ltd.”
The Other Cyclone
Reflecting nature’s wrath that brought Cyclone Nilam to Mahabalipuram, outside Chennai, there was also a brewing cyclone in the DMDK. Four of the 29 DMDK MLAs are on their way to the AIADMK, which has been making strenuous efforts to break the party for several months now. The MLAs used the pretext that they were meeting the CM to seek her intervention for development schemes in their respective constituencies. Vijayakanth’s wife, Premalatha, jeered, “Those who have met the CM have gone there with a selfish motive, to make money and to protect themselves and not in the interest of people of their constituencies.”
It is hard to believe the sudden concern for the people who elected them. And confirmation that the MLAs are halfway towards becoming Amma-worshippers came in the form of the four MLAs— C Sundarajan (Madurai Central constituency), K. Tamil Azhagan (Tittagudi), C Arun Pandian (Peeravurani) and Michael Rayyappan (Radhapuram)— sitting separately in the ongoing brief session of the assembly. Naturally, they had to face sarcastic-comments and such-like from their erstwhile colleagues. Sundarajan complained to the speaker that he had been “intimidated” by DMDK MLAs B. Parthasarathy and K. Dinakaran. What’s the next step? Speaker P Dhanapal has referred his complaint to the Privileges Committee saying it was his “duty to protect members.”
Vijayakanth, if he thought like a politician and knew that in politics one does not follow a script, should have known it was audacious on his part to take on the CM on the floor of the assembly. Now, she will not rest until she vanquishes his party and makes Vijayakanth lose his status as opposition leader. Most are not surprised by the way she operates. In 2001, she got DMK chief and former CM M Karunanidhi arrested. The opprobrium that that action brought her when she faced the wrath of the centre, media or judiciary has not softened her strategy. Vijayakanth still apparently thinks he is acting in films— that’s why his gestures and statements are over the top. They both have been butting heads right from the time Vijayakanth, albeit reluctantly, joined forces with her for the assembly elections last year. He now says he will script the climax. But methinks, amma has already done that.
Vijayakanth’s letter to the Speaker this week that five more of his MLAs want to meet the CM was rejected. The next move was to hand the letter to the CMO. That too was thwarted. “As the officials refused to accept our letter, we have sent our request through registered post to her residence and secretariat,” said V C Chandrakumar, DMDK whip.
While Cyclone Nilam was raging outside, Speaker P Dhanapal has discovered that the insistence by the five MLAs to hand over the letter seeking a meeting with amma was “politically motivated” and therefore tantamount to a breach of privilege. So not only will the MLAs not meet the CM but will face privilege action too.
We are Family
But the DMDK, like the PMK (which only promotes the Ramadoss family) has become a family enterprise. The decision makers are Vijayakanth, his wife Premalatha and her brother L. K. Suudeesh. Aware of the discomfort, Premalatha said at last week’s meeting, “Family members are not dominating the party. None of the family members was given a seat to contest in the Assembly election. Only those who had a long-term relationship with him (Vijayakanth) and those who had been with the (Vijayakanth) fan clubs were allowed to contest.” But while outsiders were given tickets, like in the AIADMK— where only Jayalalitha is supreme— or DMK, the only people who count in the DMDK are from the family. Premalatha occupies no post but wields power and Sudheesh, who was hoping to get a Rajya Sabha ticket next July, is seeing his dream unravelling thanks to the dwindling strength of the party.
Party's Not Over
Vijayakanth has told the Madras high court that he “ was totally unaware of the happenings outside the airport,” while applying for anticipatory bail in connection with the alleged assault of a reporter, Balasubramanim, who has charged the DMDK chief of abusing and assaulting him because he pestered him for a reaction after four of his MLAs cosied upto CM Jayalalitha.
When party MLA K. Pandirajan spoke expansively about how Vijayakanth was a “braveheart” in the assembly, CM Jayalalitha was sarcastic, “Is he the same person— who you say has no fear— who has approached the high court for anticipatory bail?” Incidentally, another of his party MLAs, Anagai Murugesan, who was allegedly involved in the assault of the reporter, has been arrested.
Incidentally, during the assembly elections, Murugesan was himself beaten up by an angry Vijayakanth, because the mike did not work! As Vijayakanth began his address, the mike didn't work and two other mikes given to him as replacements also failed to work. Murugesan, the candidate from Chengalpattu for whom Vijayakanth was campaigning, bore the brunt of his chief’s ire because he was also the district secretary and had made shoddy arrangements.
Is the party that showed so much promise when it was launched in 2006 dissipating? Time will tell. However, a party member is optimistic: “We opened our account in the Assembly with a single seat, and our strength grew to 29 within a short span. We could secure 8.33 per cent votes even when we went alone. A couple of people turning against our leader will not make any impact as he has single-handedly built the organisation.”
1. Rubbish 1 - "But the DMDK, like the PMK (which only promotes the Ramadoss family) has become a family enterprise" - It did not come from PMK..it came from DMK....
2. "Blame the DMK" - explain why DMK should not be blamed..
2a. Why did total MW's drastically reduce during DMK regime
2b. Why did so many totally functioning power plants end up with reduced power generation?
2c. Why did DMK buy power at such exorbitant rate to the point of more than 40,000 crore? who swindled from this fraudulent transactions?
2d. Why did DMK leave TANGEDCO with a burden of huge debt? Immediately when AIADMK took control of the state, why did both finance ministry and RBI issue orders to all financiers of TANGEDCO not to issue any more loans?
2e.What credible investments to did DMK do to meet future power demands
By cold-heartedly throwing mud at DMDK and Jayalalitha, Pushpa once again is trying to protect her pay masters - THE DMK FAMILY....
DMK when in power in the state colluded with Congress to rape not only Tamil Nadu but also our nation with their 2G scam.. When not in power in state they once again collude with Congress to destroy Jayalalitha and her efforts to solve the power crisis.,.
Pushpa stop pimping for DMK and analyze for facts, processes, timeframes that go into setting up a new 100 mw powerplant... Your articles are neither data driven nor with thorough analysis, but always biased against Jayalalitha... Jayalalitha has had share of mistakes.. but she has saved Tamilnadu from the cluthes of the most corrupt and destructive DMK family...Tamilnadu was fast heading the Afghanistan way where each member of the DMK clan where DICTATORS in their region.. The raped, looted, swindled, ran scams brazenly and journalist like you were prostituing.. shame on you. Explain what Jayalalitha should have done differently if not stop pimping for DMK family......
Are you implying then that JJ is not corrupt?
You must from Cuckooland
The only difference is that JJ is learned and therefore much more sophisticated at hiding her corruption, as compared to the DMK dadas ( and dadis )
" “Is he the same person— who you say has no fear— who has approached the high court for anticipatory bail?” asked Jayalalitha about Vijayakanth "
NO ONE is immune to the mental violence unleashed by a woman.
TamilNadu will never deveop as long as the APPA(KK) and AMMA (JJ) rule.People need to move out of these parties and develop a regional party that would be transparent in their dealings and administration.Psyhcopaths and immoral people are our leaders and we are guilty of electing them again and again.
Madam Jaya is never at fault, the follwoing are the reasons ( in the order ) why there is 22 hours load shedding in the country side.
1. People who ask for power, 2. DMK,3. Centre, 4. DMDK, 5. Cyclone, 6. Failure of moonsoon, 7. lack of maintenance of Power plants, 8. rain gods
with so much problems how can a woman with no power at her disposal give power to people.
She even tried to schuffle the ministry many times , still the power situation did not improve, You what else a poor woman do.
Yes, off course we have to live like this for the next four years.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT