The pride of position Af-Pak occupies in American foreign policy was underscored once again during the final presidential debate—that dwelt on foreign policy—between President Barack Obama and Governor Mitt Romney: Pakistan was raised no less than 25 times.
The contenders’ keen interest on a country thousands of miles away was equally matched the day after in Pakistan’s newspaper headlines, some of which ran: ‘Romney soft, Obama tough on Pakistan’; ‘One thing Obama, Romney agree on—Pakistan’; and ‘Obama, Romney sing the same tune on drones’.
It was clear from the tough-talking debaters that the US policy on Pakistan is characterised by an attitude of wariness and deficit of trust, and that notwithstanding the final outcome of the presidential elections, there is unlikely to be any major change of stance towards Islamabad. Some Pakistanis blamed the way the country featured in the debate on diplomatic failure. But everyone agreed that relations between the two countries won’t be in a freeze.
“It’s not the time to divorce a nation that has 100 nuclear weapons and is on the way to double that at some point. Pakistan is technically an ally, and they are not acting very much like any ally right now. It’s a nation that does not have a civilian leadership that is calling the shots there,” Romney had said. The president hinted at worse, saying that Osama bin Laden would certainly have escaped had the US sought permission from Pakistan.
The News International sums it up thus: “Pakistan battles for its sovereignty; the US seems convinced it must do all it can to battle militancy as the US sees fit”.
A PEW survey in June showed that currently 7 per cent of Pakistanis favour Obama, which runs even lower than the popularity of President Bush in the last year of his term. The BBC World Service poll found that Pakistan is the only overseas country of those polled that said it would prefer to see the Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney win the November elections. According to the poll, both candidates were given less than 20 per cent approval by Pakistanis, with Romney leading by a narrow margin.
The English daily Express Tribune says that traditionally, Republicans have maintained warmer ties and given more aid to Pakistan. At the same time, they “have also been more comfortable dealing with our military since there is a bipartisan consensus in Washington that Pakistan is brimming with rogue actors and that a military option, in the form of drone strikes, is completely necessary”.
Senator Mushahid Hussain, chairman, Senate Defence Committee, who created waves when the army’s budget and performance were publicly discussed by parliamentarians for the first time ever, says Pakistan remains “indispensable” to the US, and underlines the absence of any mention of India in the third Obama-Romney debate.
“The hard fact is that despite tall talk of a close strategic partnership, not once was India mentioned by Obama or Romney in their foreign policy debate on October 22. Conversely, Pakistan was mentioned at least 25 times, which shows that whatever the problems, both Obama and Romney regard Pakistan as indispensable for American strategy in Afghanistan,” claims the senator.
This signifies that, despite the impending change in political leadership in China and the upcoming US presidential polls, Pakistan has positioned itself to leverage its role and location with both a rising China and a declining America, adds Mushahid. Others feel that real change should come from within Pakistan, since the old pattern of bilateral relations has not delivered in the long run.
Raza Rumi, director at Jinnah Institute, said recently, “It is time to make some tough choices. Pakistan can either decide to be independent, free itself of US aid and reduce its engagement with America. Or it can take the alternative route of becoming friends and imbibing global values.”
Obama or Romney, it is apparent that Washington won’t certainly change its polices towards Islamabad—whether on conditional aid, the use of drones or action against militants.
Is Pakistan ready to take the first step and, as Rumi says, to start to assert itself in a more purposeful way?
The greatest Acheivement of President Obama outside domestic sphere is undoubtedly the killing of the international mass murderer and terrorist osama bin laden.
For once, the death of Osama Bin Laden has shown that theocratic pakistan cannot have its way killing everyone and everybody who refuse its theocratic beliefs.
A major point in the thinking of Republican strategists is the fact that Pakistan has over 100 nuclear warheads. Without that they would be too happy to cut Pakistan loose at the earliest possible opportunity!
25 mentions in the despatches should be a cause for concern, not pride.
It seems, the world wants Pakistan to engage diplomatically. The prevailing idea might be, that Pakistan wants to engage, then, when it does.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT