When I was 17, Bombay was a green city, with gardens coming right down to Peddar Road. It was really wonderful. It was a lively city, and as college boys, we used to go to striptease joints like the Mandarin, near the Gateway of India, especially to watch ‘Tamico, the Hot Tomato’. I used to sport handlebar moustaches, like the military people who were then considered smart and fashionable.
I was already doing theatre, and I produced my first big play in 1954, The Taming of the Shrew. Bombay was an arty place, where theatre was meaningful. Adi Marzban, the master of comedy, was making plays in Parsi-Gujarati. Bombay had no censorship issues and was a very easy town. It was the only city in India that was truly modern: Calcutta was still the British Raj, Delhi was little more than a collection of villages, Chennai was a city of temples and Bangalore was still getting on its feet.
Those days, south Bombay was the real Bombay. Bandra was considered miles away and so was Juhu. We never thought about anything beyond Bandra. Jogeshwari was a jungle. I was a complete townie and town was so terrific. Skyscrapers were not allowed during those days because, I was told, the fire brigade did not have ladders to reach beyond a certain height.
In the 1950s, Bollywood was considered downmarket. The highbrows would just smile and smirk at anyone who saw a Hindi film. There was a distinct divide between the westernised, English-speaking people and those who spoke only local languages, such as Hindi, Marathi and Gujarati. The two never met. We sneaked into a few movies to watch Madhubala and Nargis, but we too were very snooty.
Also, there were no intelligent films being made, except for a few by people like Raj Kapoor, Bimal Roy and Guru Dutt. We were big fans of these filmmakers. The atmosphere was very different, full of national spirit, because it wasn’t many years since we had gained independence. I had an uncle who was a staunch Gandhian; he wore khadi and donned a Gandhi cap. We were all proud of the naval mutiny, which happened in 1946.
We used read a newspaper called The Bombay Chronicle (more than the Times of India) and weekly magazines such as Current and Blitz were popular. The advertising industry was at amateur level—one copywriter would do most of the advertising work, sitting in an air-conditioned room. There was no market research, there was no testing of ads before release. Cinema advertising was king.
As told to Prachi Pinglay-Plumber
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT