To say that Ashok Khemka, the IAS officer from Haryana who lifted the lid from the questionable favours shown by Haryana government to Robert Vadra, is the proverbial cat among the pigeons describes the current state of panic in the present power dispensation in Haryana, that otherwise enjoys a special status with the Congress party’s central leadership. The unease is equally shared by the opposition parties of Haryana, led by Om Prakash Chautala’s Indian National Lok Dal (INLD), because favours exchanged between real estate developers and successive governments in this state, that has a substantial chunk of its area in the NCR, have been a given for long.
Lost in the din of Khemka’s transfer, following his action of cancelling a mutation for land in Shikohpur village of Gurgaon sold by Vadra to DLF, is the issue of vast discretion wielded by the government though its Town and Country Planning (TCP) and sister departments in permitting change in land use (CLU) of agricultural land for urban development and exemption from acquisition. It is this CLU/licence that caused Vadra’s land to appreciate in value from Rs 7.9 crores to Rs 58 crores in just 65 days. Change of land use is the single biggest hurdle that ordinary farmers encounter if they wish to utilize their lands for colonization because, they lack the clout and the means to get the elusive permission. This is where middlemen come in and real estate developers freely utilize their services to get the tedious clearances required before a piece of land is actually developed. At a time when the government is using the argument of eliminating middlemen in purchase of agriculture commodities to push for foreign direct investment in multi brand retail, elimination of middlemen in real estate development has not got the attention it deserves. Consider for a moment the possibility of the CLU premium going to the end consumer of a developer or even to the government and the contours of the game change. Not only will it result in more revenue for the government but the buyers of residential and commercial complexes developed by real estate companies also stand to gain. It is no secret that state governments and real estate biggies enjoy a cosy relationship that cuts across the political spectrum. It is this relationship that Khemka’s actions threaten to unravel, and the ensuing public attention that discretion in issuance licences and CLU or exemption of valuable land from acquisition is beginning to get, that has unnerved the politico bureaucratic establishment.
Khemka has been shunted out within three months of taking change as Director General Consolidation and Land Records and within hours of initiating an investigation into the various Vadra deals. His action of cancelling the Vadra-DLF mutation has been challenged in writing by a livid TC Gupta, the Director General Town and Country Planning, who has been holding this appointment undisturbed for the last more than three years. In a strongly worded letter to the chief secretary Gupta has questioned some of the steps taken by Khemka in cancelling the Vadra-DLF land deal and sought action against the latter “for levelling unfounded allegations against the working of the TCP department.” That Gupta enjoys the favour of the government is clear from the fact, that even after being held guilty of contempt of court by the Punjab and Haryana High Court on July 24th, the Haryana government has not considered transferring him. The matter relates to the creation of two new sectors 63A and 67 A under the Gurgaon-Manesar urban complex 2025, wherein a petitioner from Faridabad had complained that against the original proposal for four sectors, these two new sectors had been added by the TCP department to benefit some builders. Acting on the petition, the HC had last year ordered that status quo should be maintained. However, it was found that in violation of the HC orders, the TCP department issued a license to M/s Anantraj Industries for construction in Sector 63A. Just hours before the HC was decide on the quantum of punishment for Gupta, he got a reprieve from the Supreme Court, which stayed the contempt proceedings.
That the interests of builders prevail over that of the common man is more than evident in the recent stay on construction ordered by the Supreme Court in DLF’s prestigious housing colony in Pinjore. In September 2009, the Haryana Urban Estates department which also comes under the Director General of Town and Coutry Planning, issued a notification for acquisition of 809.74 acres of land for 31 new sectors that the state Urban Development Authority intended to develop on both sides of national highway 22 between Kalka and Pinjore. However, by the time the award was announced, the intended acquisition was reduced to just 372.388 acres and even after passing the award, another 72.3 acres was released from acquisition. DLF and Ireo two major realtors who benefited from the exemption, are now developing colonies on 450 acres of the released land. The SC while ordering a stay on construction observed, “This gives the impression that in the guise of acquiring land for public purpose ie development of new sectors, the government misused the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 for the benefit of private companies and builders.” The SC is inclined to quash the entire acquisition and has given an opportunity to the builders to give their defence. What exactly has happened here? Explaining the process, a property dealer in the areas told Outlook, “If the realtors had entered the area to buy land from farmers, they would have had to pay the much higher market rate. But since the government announced acquisition proceedings, rates in the area fell and the builders were able to pick up their requirement at a marginally higher rate than the government notified rates.” The losers are thousands of ordinary people looking for cheap plots and flats in the government’s originally proposed sectors, which have been whittled down to half. The government used its discretion to favour the builders once again.
Khemka has targeted this clique, and going by the response of the Haryana government so far, there seems little hope of some corrective initiative in the near future. It has formed a committee headed by an additional chief secretary and two other senior officers to look into the issues raised by Khemka, but the man who blew the whistle has been kept out of it. Inspite of the nationwide uproar that followed his transfer, the government is not risking putting him back on the job from which he was removed in such haste. If the government had allowed Khemka to complete the investigation that he began, perhaps it would have been redeemed to some extent. But an impartial investigation into Robert Vadra’s questionable land deals is the last thing the government wants at the moment. Proving that Khemka erred in taking action is its uppermost priority. It mattered little that the person fielded to take him on, has been hauled up by the court. Khemka has already declared that if any of his actions are found to be unwarranted, the government or any of the aggrieved parties, are can always approach the courts. He is already getting ready for the next round of flak that he knows is imminent, once the dust raised by the media uproar settles. In this, quite typically, he has no help from his fellow officers, many of who claim to be his silent supporters. There has not been even a token noise from the Haryana IAS Officers Association as it silently watched one of its own being mauled for standing firm.
perehaps someone in supreme court registry has got the stayed case papers lost. The case will rest in peace to the happiness of congress party and its cronies
Sonia Gandhi and her Congress Govts may wax eloquent about fighting corruption and the role of AAdhaar in reducing corruption, but whne it comes to implementation, they stall since it affects their relatives and friends and economic and political well being.
The 1991-batch IAS officer had, on October 10, hours before he was shifted from the department, framed the Haryana Registration Rules, 2012, making the Aadhaar number for individuals and corporate identity number (CIN) for firms mandatory for registration of all documents, including land registration. Aadhaar numbers are issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), while CIN is issued by the ministry of corporate affairs.
While the new rules are being seen as potential game-changer in ensuring transparency in land deals, the state government is still to grant its approval and publish them in the official gazette even after two weeks.
The man probing Khema allegations is under scanner for corruption!
Haryana's additional chief secretary Krishna Mohan, who heads the three-member inquiry committee set up by the state government to probe into the issues raised by whistleblower IAS officer Ashok Khemka in the Robert Vadra-DLF land deal, is still under the scanner of CBI.
The special CBI court here had recently refused to accept a closure report filed by the investigating agency on Krishna Mohan involvement in the multicrore amusement-cum-theme park project scam in Chandigarh.
By doing so, the FIR said, they caused "wrongful loss to the government and corresponding wrongful gain to UNITECH".
With a DEAD judiciary, no one need fear anyone in loot raj.
Meanwhile, the CONgress can play politics with an ordinary bureacrat.
What a shameful end to the Congress party!
As Manmohan Singh said, Caesar's wife should be above suspicion. But he said nothing about Caesar's son-in-law. SO who cares?
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT