Girl Power Points
“I think about it often and imagine the scene clearly. Even if they come to kill me, I will tell them what they are trying to do is wrong.” Words of striking clarity. Written by Malala Yousafzai when she was only 11 years old. It was 2009, when Taliban fighters had descended on the picturesque Swat valley and repeatedly attacked schools, offices, cinemas, barber and music shops. The local town square was renamed Khooni Chowk, or Bloody Square, as the Taliban delivered their extreme ‘justice’ to victims here. Vice squads were everywhere, flogging young girls and murdering dancers and singers. Thousands of panic-stricken residents of Swat and Malakand districts in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province were internally displaced overnight. Malala—who started out as an activist in favour of female education—and her family resisted for as long as they could.
The Pakistan army was dispatched in May 2009 and, after a full-scale military operation, wrested control of Swat from the Taliban. Except for the few months of the worst fighting, Malala’s father didn’t shut the school he owned.
“We put away our school uniform, while hiding our books under our chador so the Taliban could not see them,” Malala had said, speaking of her determination to study under daily Taliban threats in the months before she had to flee her native Mingora. Then, years after peace returned to Swat valley, on October 9, 2012, the Taliban shot Malala in the head and injured two of her classmates after identifying her in an open school van. She had been marked for revenge ever since she wrote a blog for the BBC in 2009, about life under the shadow of the Taliban. After 2009, she had continued her outspoken activism for girls’ education.
As a horrified nation watched Malala struggling for her life, the Tehreek-e Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility and said they opposed her ‘secular’ mindset and quoted the Quran to say her quest for knowledge was un-Islamic.
The spontaneous reaction from the political, religious and military leadership was one of shock and outrage; most swore that they could no longer tolerate the Taliban barbarians. “I am Malala. We are all Malala,” chanted Pakistanis in open defiance of Taliban edicts, united in an unprecedented manner. The international community condemned the attack on Malala (named after an Afghan queen), and prayers were held for her even in Afghanistan.
Foreign minister Hina Rabbani Khar said that when she sees Malala she’ll tell her, “You are my hero”. She told Daily Beast, “What is clear is that, first of all, they (Taliban) do us all a favour because they reveal that they follow no Islam. Because the teachings of Islam—#what the Prophet Mohammed taught us, what the Quran preaches—are the opposite of what they did. What they have done is, in a very stark manner, dissociated themselves (from Islam)....”
MQM rally in Karachi condemns the Taliban act. (Photograph by AP)
Declaring as “un-Islamic” the attack on Malala, over 50 Sunni clerics from the moderate Barelvi school of thought issued a fatwa, terming the Taliban’s interpretation of Islam as “repugnant”, since the religion in actual fact makes it obligatory on its followers to seek education. The Sunni Ittehad Council said in their combined fatwa: “Islam doesn’t prohibit women from getting education. The attackers transgressed the Islamic Hudood (principles).”
The army, it must be said, are hesitant to cleanse North Waziristan of the TTP, the Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, the Jundullah, the Afghan Haqqani network and other tanzeems with foreign fighters. It’s in that frontier province that those who shot Malala and attacked army installations in recent months have hideouts.
The wariness is more stark on the political side. As public demands for army action grow, MQM’s Altaf Hussain has emerged as the most vocal leader, naming the Taliban as the enemy and pledging support for the army. However, it is a significant fact that apart from the MQM, not one political party has spoken of the Taliban while condemning the attack on Malala—not even the fire-and-brimstone-spewing Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf chief Imran Khan.
The reason why parties are shying away from demanding army action in North Waziristan is that general elections in Pakistan are around the corner, and politicians naturally fear reprisals from the Taliban during campaigning. Then again, some religious parties maintain links with the extremists.
“As a nation, we have lost the spine to go ahead with this (military) operation. A definite and unanimous stand must be taken by the National Assembly against terrorism. I don’t think the military wants an operation in Waziristan,” author and defence and security analyst Ayesha Siddiqa told Express Tribune.
Afiya Shehrbano, a sociologist, says, “The army too has been a master of invention and reinvention. From sovereign defender, it is now viewed as a collaborator (of the US) and a violator of the human rights of the perpetrator-cum-victim—the militants of FATA (the Federally Administered Tribal Areas, of which North Waziristan is a part). However, the same sympathy or label of ‘victim’ does not apply to the militant Baloch at the receiving end of the army’s extra-judicial acts.”
Today, as Malala fights for her life in Birmingham’s Queen Elizabeth hospital, thousands of Pakistanis feel she brought home the fact that the nation does not want to return to the stone age by allowing the Taliban’s writ to run in Pakistan.
Farahnaz Ispahani, a politician, tells the Daily Beast, “Have Pakistanis grasped the significance of the attack on Malala beyond the sympathy for a brave child? Did political leaders, religious clerics, civil society and media stars march in the streets against the Taliban as they fashionably do against the government or the world’s superpower? No. Did millions or even thousands join them? No.”
Malala’s Pakistan has to be saved by fighting a good war. The army and the government owes thousands like her their right to knowledge and enlightenment.
Pakistan was born out of the blood of innocents, it’ll perish in the blood of its citizens (Swat the Taliban, Oct 29). India too will go Pakistan’s way if it can’t control or eradicate the hardliner clergy whose bellicose firmans were heard in the Azad Maidan desecration in Mumbai.
Ram Prasn Haryanvi, Haryana
The assassination attempt on the courageous Malala Yousafzai was an attack on all women—even civilisation itself. It is an eye-opener for Pakistan’s institutions and citizens about what it means to be a true Muslim and a good human being.
K.R. Srinivasan, Secunderabad
The Taliban have proven once again that they have to be fought to the finish. The outrage shown by Pakistan’s civil society is laudable; the government’s ambivalence is a disappointment though. The time has come to relaunch a military drive to crush the remnants of the Taliban.
J.S. Acharya, Hyderabad
Apropos the story on the outrage against the attack on Malala Yousafzai (Swat The Taliban, Oct 29). I am sure Islam doesn’t give its followers the right to shoot a 14-year-old girl just because she was a spokesperson for girls’ education. The international press was brilliant in highlighting Malala’s case, and it’s great to know she’s recovering well, but there are thousands like her in Pakistan and Afghanistan who risk acid attacks and forcible abduction every day for standing up for their rights.
Female victims of violence are darlings for the media, public and politicians as well. Unlike the numerous males who are killed almost routinely to the point that gender ratios are altered!
The feminists will take care of propagating myths and stories now, in order to gain even more respect for themselves.
Pakistan was borne out of the Blood of innocents .It will perish in blood of its Countrymen .
We have our set of Talibans like hand cutters who now rule Kerala along with Congress and an newly formed Christian Party.We have another Maulana ruling Assam with as Partner of Congress whose antics lead to fleeing of NE People from all over the Country -the scenes we witnessed only during 1947. And supporting Partners of UPA like MIM leaders who said the Third Wave of Islamic Terrorism will hit India soon if atrocities in Burma were not stopped !
India too will go the Pakistan's way if we can't eradicate hardliner Clergy whose bellicose Firmans we heard on Azad Maidan in Mumbai in August .
India is in no different situation .Just a matter of time !
'The difference between Israel and India is that an Indian keeps getting slapped by the Pakistani, and keeps threatening to slap back. An Israeli will knock him out senseless at the first opportunity'
Bruce Campbell for Prez
Great comment !
"because we feel, that we will be harmed by them, when we are not being harmed by them."
This sentence is demonstrative of the confused, henpecked thinking that can only come from a coward.
I was having a conversation about Pakistan with a Jewish colleague the other day. You know what he said? 'The difference between Israel and India is that an Indian keeps getting slapped by the Pakistani, and keeps threatening to slap back. An Israeli will knock him out senseless at the first opportunity'
Let me be fair. It seems to me, we are trying to influence the Taliban, by any which way, because we feel, that we will be harmed by them, when we are not being harmed by them. The U. S. thinks, that the culture of the Taliban may be important in the U. S., in some manner. That is why, they want their culture to be important in Taliban country. This is not what I would do. I don't see any good, because this is being defeatist, and the U. S. is saying, that they have no choice, but to face situations they are not accustomed to. They imply, that when a soldier of any nationality dies, or if a common man dies, then it is not the same, as when the Taliban kill people, even if the soldier mentioned, or the common man is also killed. If Ms. Baabar is a Pashtun, how does she feel, if a Pashtun man dies? In a blood feud, and not because he is associated with the Taliban? There are people dying in Afghanistan, not because Afghans are intent on killing themselves.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT