The key question in l’affaire Vadra is similar to the key question in l’affaire Bofors. “What services did A.E. Services provide for Ottavio Quattrocchi to swing the deal in favour of Bofors?” Chitra Subramaniam Duella, whose reports from Geneva in The Hindu had exposed the payment of kickbacks, had asked then. It’s a question she still asks. Reframing it for Congress chief Sonia Gandhi’s son-in-law Robert Vadra, whose alleged acquisitions through unsecured loans from realty giant DLF have been exposed by anti-corruption campaigner Arvind Kejriwal, she puts it thus: “What services has Vadra rendered to become a millionaire overnight?” As for the denials—from Vadra, DLF, many Union ministers and Congress functionaries—she says, “Then, as now, when denials are disproportionate to the allegations, they raise suspicion.”
There always have been whispers of what powered the rise and rise of Vadra, who is married to Sonia’s daughter Priyanka and is sometimes referred to as the country’s premier son-in-law, or, as in a recent SMS joke, the FDI—‘First Damaad (son-in-law) of India’. At times, there would be some talk in the newsrooms. Nothing solid came of that. But Kejriwal—stuck though he is in a plan for starting a new political party—came out with company names and figures, underlining his allegations with accounting skills acquired as a former IRS officer who served in the Income-Tax department.
Kejriwal and his comrade-in-arms, lawyer-activist Prashant Bhushan, did away with the ‘courtesies’ political parties have often extended to each other when exposes of corruption happen. For instance, when questions were raised over Ranjan Bhattacharya, foster son-in-law of former PM Atal Behari Vajpayee, wielding influence at the PMO, the Congress maintained a studied silence. The whispers never went beyond political circles. “It may or may not be a Bofors moment, but a convention appears to have been shattered—the convention of silence,” says political commentator Yogendra Yadav, who has aligned himself with Kejriwal and Bhushan. “Once it has been shattered, it is difficult to repair.”
As is their wont, Congress biggies scrambled to clear the ‘family name’. Union finance minister P. Chidambaram said the allegations against Vadra are a private matter concerning private individuals and business entities. (But, in a side plot, Union law minister Salman Khursheed, who promised to lay down his life for the Congress president, found some NGOs he and his wife Louise Khursheed run exposed in a TV sting op.)
Kejriwal and his fellow-campaigners have also found themselves under attack. “They are daydreamers, these people spreading rumours in the media are with the right wing. They have no ideology. Their politics is based on demolition, destruction. If you have something against a private individual, go for the legal process,” says B.K. Hariprasad, Congress general secretary. The silence of another general secretary, Digvijay Singh, given his habit of jumping to the Gandhi family’s defence, has been intriguing. But Rajiv Shukla, another Gandhi family loyalist, has struck out by questioning Bhushan’s own land deal in Palanpur, Himachal Pradesh. The party spokesman, Rashid Alvi, could do no better in defence of Vadra than say that the charges were nothing new.
What could be new is the way in which the Congress—and of course, the Gandhis—will be affected by these allegations. “This attack may well be the last straw for the Congress. It’s worse than the Bofors moment, for equations between the party and the family may get affected,” says political scientist D.L. Sheth. “The Congress may even become a different party from what it is now.” There is tell-tale evidence of Sheth’s prediction. Senior Congress functionaries, who were falling over each other to denounce the allegations against Vadra and ascribe motives to Kejriwal and his group, are now grudgingly saying “it’s a private matter”. The implied message: the party and the Gandhis are two different things. Says a source in the Congress, “It’s for individuals to defend their own positions.” And concerning Shukla’s attack on the Bhushans, Congress general secretary Janardhan Dwivedi says, “If a minister (Shukla holds the parliamentary affairs portfolio) alleges this and has documents to show, he is free to do so.” This marks out how the party is pushing the ‘let individuals defend themselves’ line. Though the party puts on a brave public face, the mood within is despondent. As Sheth sees it, the short-term impact of the allegations may well be general elections before 2014; the long-term consequences could affect the umbilical cord that binds the party to the Gandhi family.
No gain, no pain Vadra, a fitness buff, works out at a gym. (Photograph by Rajwant Rawat)
The short-term political play-out has already begun with manoeuvres from the Samajwadi Party (SP), the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) and the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP). The NCP is asking its workers to gear up for early elections. The SP and the BSP, notorious fair-weather partners, are keeping the UPA guessing. The BSP was to make its position clear on October 10, but hedged its bets and continued to support the ruling coalition. Says BSP MP Seema Upadhyay, “Mudslinging is expected—but the Congress must come out in the open and explain everything to the common man, showing evidence. It will contribute positively to the credibility of the Congress.”
At the same time, there’s an underlying fear in all parties: who will be the next target of campaigners like Kejriwal? The BJP, despite being the main opposition, has demanded a probe but is not very vociferous. Speculation is rife that some of its senior members could end up facing similar allegations.
The Trinamool Congress, a former ally that tried to bring the UPA down on its knees, has made no official comment yet. Its chief, Mamata Banerjee, has shown much respect for the Gandhis and seems to be continuing to do so. Bhudeo Chowdhary of the JD(U) brought politeness to a new level with, “Allegations have been levelled against a person with close proximity to the top Congress leadership. The ruling party should clarify doubts and order a probe. This will help its credibility grow. If necessary, we will all unite and demand a probe.” Mohammed Salim, of the CPI(M), says, “We need a transparent, time-bound probe, free from any kind of pressure. As far as our silence is concerned on the matter, we have expressed our views at the right time and from the right platform. We won’t do anything extra for the media’s perception.”
So is this really another Bofors moment for the Congress? For people like Chitra, indeed it is. “Bofors was only Rs 64 crore—and we’ve been saying ‘Out, damned spot!’ for 25 years,” she says. “This will be a big one for the Congress to defend. Short of coming clean, nothing will work.”
Vadra is just a fuse safeguarding the first family (Country-Made Howitzer). If and when the need arises, the fuse will be allowed to blow to insulate the core family.
K. Suresh, Bangalore
Sonia and Co’s Bofors moment is yet to come—right now, it’s just the supremely arrogant son-in-law who has been exposed. Just wait.
Quite stupid of him, If my mom in law had Rs 10,00,00,00,00,000 (1 lakh crore ,$19b http://www.businessinsider.com/richest-politicians-in-the-world-2012-2?op=1), i would never be in shady deals worth few hundred crores.
The Bofors moment for Sonia and clan is yet to come - right now it is only the supremely arrogant son-in-law who did not bother to cover his tracks in his perpetual money making shady deals who has been exposed.
Rajesh @ Phoenix >> May be Modi is a victim of media trial. What is your point if any? Don't overlook one crucial difference - Modi holds a public office.
Thanks for agreeing at last that Modi might be a victim of media trial.
As for public office, DLF is a PUBLICLY LISTED COMPANY and it is incorporated in India. So it is in the interest of public -minority shareholders, public interest finanicial institutions like LIC/SBI/PSU Banks which lent crores to DLF and to government of India that the DLF's illegal deals that reduced its cash flow and profits to benefit an individual are thoroughly probed. As a publicly listed India incorporated company, DLF cooking books and having less profits affects minority shareholders, Government of India (less corporate tax), financial institutions( delayed interest payment on loans and less share price).
So, the DLF - Vadra deal needs COMPLETE PROBE and Vadra cannot be let off hook as you may wish to.
K Suresh>> Vadra is just a fuse safeguarding the first family. If the need arises, the fuse will be allowed to be blown insulating the core family.
Correctly said.. Vadra is NOT INDISPENSABLE. The First Family did not need Feroz Gandhi and no one remembers him despite his short life with few good deeds (exposing Mundra scam). The First family disconnected itself from Maneka Gandhi after sanjay gandhi died. And Vadra can also be disconnected and thrown away for the larger good of family..
Vadra is just a fuse safeguarding the first family. If the need arises, the fuse will be allowed to be blown insulating the core family.
That said, Kejariwal (AK) should have confined himself to non-political civil movement exposing corruption in high places instead of plunging into 'hardcore' politics and thus losing media support. Now the media (MSM that is) will get a legitimate reason to target the 'political' AK. Contrast this with Anna Hazare who has retained his 'high moral' ground, nonwithstanding some of his autocratic, and sometimes stupid recipes to combat corruption. Armed with whatever RTI is worth, AK could have become 'poor man's Julian Assange' exposing corruption.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT