The jury is still out on whether real estate giant DLF got a quid pro quo from the Haryana government for the unsecured loans given to Robert Vadra. But there is hardly any debate over the special influence DLF and its sister companies command in the state. For examples of the state’s benevolence, consider two cases involving DLF, unravelled under judicial scrutiny in the last couple of years.
Last year, the Punjab and Haryana High Court found that DLF had acquired vast areas of land in Haryana after floating several fictitious companies to circumvent the provisions of the Haryana Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1972. (The Act bars a Haryana landowner from possessing more than 7.25 hectares of good arable land or a maximum of 18 hectares of barren land.) This was in pursuance to cases filed by these ‘firms’ to get land released. In June ’11, it directed the government not to grant any licence to DLF and other companies in violation of this law.
The government responded with uncharacteristic alacrity, amending the Act itself through a special ordinance issued on Aug 8, ’11—now land acquired by a person for non-agricultural use is exempted from the provisions of the Act. The amendment was done with retrospective effect from Jan 1975, so excess land held by big realty and sez owners acquired since then automatically got exempted.
The builders were elated, but the court wasn’t letting go. It was appalled to learn that DLF and its associates had “developed more than 3,000 acres of land” by floating “subsidiary companies with small share capital to save itself from the rigour of the 1972 Act or some other Act to get tax benefits”. Rattled by the court’s adverse remarks, DLF and its associate companies withdrew its cases. But the court decided to investigate further and “lift the corporate veil”. So, though it allowed the DLF companies to withdraw the case, it turned the petition into a suo motu PIL to get to the bottom of the matter. The HC order has since been stayed by the Supreme Court, but its ripples are evident. The court appointed noted lawyer Anupam Gupta as amicus curiae to assist it as a neutral party. In one of his submissions, Gupta said, “Take away DLF and the entire structure of industrialisation and economy will collapse and fall to the ground. This single player has overwhelmed the entire state apparatus in Haryana.”
Then there’s the curious case of DLF’s Panchkula Valley project located in the picturesque Shivalik foothills. Between 2007-2009, the Haryana government favoured DLF and another builder, Ireo, by exempting vast chunks of their land from acquisition norms to enable them to launch their prestigious projects on National Highway 22 between Pinjore and Kalka. The matter became public recently after it came on the SC radar which was hearing a plea that the Haryana government had adopted a pick-and-choose method to release land from acquisition for public purposes.
Finding substance in the petitioners’ plea, the SC observed, “The list of persons in whose favour land has been released show that most of them are builders or their collaborators. This gives the impression that in the guise of acquiring land for public purpose ie development of some sectors in Panchkula, the state government misused the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for the benefit of private companies and builders.” It has stayed any further construction by these builders and said that “we are prima facie of the view that the entire acquisition proceedings deserve to be quashed”.
What Quatrocchi was to Sonia, Robert is to Priyanka. Not many realise Priyanka's PM aspirations have been damned. The party for the First Family is over. Its open season now.
Non matriculates in India can hardly get a job. But The Nehru family is raking in billions. How? Many people in the media still cant see the smoke.
There are no surprises here. This is exactly how big business in loot-raj is done. And that is why remain ineffcient and scared of real competition ( like FDI in retail ).
The media and the opposition may pretend to be surprised, but DLF ( like the mining companies before ) is no exception. It is only that in this case, the beneficiary was Robert, husband of Priyanka.
DLF and Gurgaon are brain children of Late Rajiv Gandhi...
So, that is yet another proof to show how the dynasty has always been at work to create scams , scams and more scams.
Cream Pie >> Many people in the media still cant see the smoke.
The Media will not since they are all ardent disciples of Saint Sonia !!
See the deafening silence of CNN-IBN and NDTV on whole issue. Both these newschannels lived a long life being propaganda arms of the CON-party. But now they are wondering, is the beginning of end here?
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT