The various allegations made against Mr Robert Vadra, the husband of Ms Priyanka Gandhi and the son-in-law of Mrs Sonia Gandhi, the president of the Congress, fall into two categories--criminal and ethical.
The criminal allegations relate to accumulation of wealth beyond his known sources of income.
The other allegations relating to the favours shown to him by the DLF in matters of loans, advances and under-estimation of property value would indicate, if established to be true, a pattern of unethical and not illegal conduct by Mr Vadra.
All these allegations, even if they remain allegations without proof, will have their political fall-out in influencing the perceptions of large sections of the people regarding Ms Priyanka Gandhi, Mrs Sonia Gandhi and the Congress.
The allegations have to be countered at the political, ethical and legal levels. The political counter has to come from Mrs Sonia Gandhi in her capacity as the Congress president and the authorised spokespersons of her party. The objective of the political counter would be to prevent Mrs Sonia Gandhi, Ms Priyanka Gandhi and the Congress from being tainted by the alleged wrong-doings of Mr Vadra and to convince the public that whatever Mr Vadra did was in his individual capacity and that the party, its president and daughter cannot be blamed for his actions.
For this purpose, it is quite legitimate for Mrs Sonia Gandhi to direct the spokespersons of her party to interact with the media and appear on TV channels to refute any allegations against the Congress, Mrs Sonia Gandhi and Ms Priyanka Gandhi.
The allegations of an ethical nature have to be countered by Mr Vadra and the DLF through their personal and institutional explanations to the public. The DLF has sought to do this to some extent, but Mr Vadra has avoided doing this and has sought to take a holier than thou attitude.
On the criminal allegation regarding accumulation of wealth beyond his known sources of income, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has to take cognisance of the published reports and initiate the following action:
In this connection, the fielding of senior members of the council of ministers headed by Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh and the Governor of Karnataka to certify his business transactions as above board without a formal PE as required under the laws relating to corruption and income tax evasion is not only unethical and irregular, but also illegal. The interventions of these representatives of the government in order to discount in advance the need for any PE amounts to attempts to obstruct and influence the course of justice in order to ensure that the law does not take its course against Mr Vadra.
By pronouncing, without an enquiry, Mr Vadra innocent, these ministers can be held to be trying to influence the investigating agencies not to go into the matter because Mr Vadra is a privileged person related to Mrs Sonia Gandhi and Ms Priyanka Gandhi and is above the law and any investigation.
It is not known whether the ministers have sought to intervene officially in a matter with possible criminal connotations on their own to proclaim their loyalty to Mrs Sonia Gandhi or at her instance and whether Dr Manmohan Singh, as the Prime Minister, has approved of their actions.
If all these interventions have been made by the ministers without his knowledge and approval, it is time for him to call them to order and to state clearly to the public that the government headed by him would not try to prevent or influence any follow-up action that may be required under the law by agencies of the government to investigate the allegations.
If Dr Manmohan Singh strongly feels unhappy over the actions of some of his ministers, it is time for him to resign from office instead of allowing the dignity and moral stature of his high office to be tainted by their actions.
In the Watergate enquiry in the US, serious allegations of obstruction of justice and prevention of enquiry by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) were made against the then President Richard Nixon and his aides, including the then acting Director of the FBI. When these allegations were found to be true, he had to resign and his aides who sought to obstruct justice and prevent the law from taking its course were prosecuted and jailed. Personally, Mr Vadra cannot be equated with Nixon. He does not hold any office in the government of India. Whatever unethical or illegal acts he allegedly committed were in his individual capacity.
If an ordinary citizen of India had been accused of such acts, large sections of the governmental machinery would not have activated itself or would not have been activated in order to protect him from the arms of the law. The public perception will be that this has been done in his case because he is the son-in-law of Mrs Sonia Gandhi.
This matter should be debated in all its details and implications in order to ensure that there is no attempt to prevent the law from taking its course.
B. Raman is Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, New Delhi, and, presently, Director, Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai, and Associate of the Chennai Centre For China Studies
Pradip Singh >> Is it you thesis that Vadra is a crook, but the white empress, the prince, and the princess are paragons of virtue?
Given a chance, B Raman will even advise us that Priyanka , the spotless princess and paragon of virtue should divorce Vadra and take charge of the nation in larger interest of Aam admi.
Such is the kind of journalism that is peddled in Indian mainstream media, espically over here. It is a shame that we are forced to read such paid stuff patronizing one family that has ruled and misruled India for decades.
So Mr Raman, do you or do you not stick to your opinion expressed recently in Outlook that Priyanka would make a good PM?
Is it you thesis that Vadra is a crook, but the white empress, the prince, and the princess are paragons of virtue? Please enlighten us.
How he acquired wealth in such a short time, according to raman is Criminal issue and DLF_Vadra cosy relations which provided the financial support to the criminal acquisition of wealth is not criminal; but ethical. Massive data pouring from public records is not evidence or even circumstantial evidence. That's what Mr. Ram,an is telling us loudly and clearly.
With 'intelligent' officers like this we should stop looking into our 'intelligence' failures.
They are playing Mamashri of the serial Mahabharat. There was hardly any need for them to jump in the fray. They have criminalised the whole issue by their exculpation.Why do these ministers, governors and politicians make such a fool of themselves ? Their shouting or taping the IAC activists will not close the matter. Let the law take its own course.Instead do some good governance.
In today's world anybody can be called names or prosecuted either under real or unreal accusations.That includes Mr Raman ! All depends on the political and media power one has.Kejriwal has started a party and he knows how to hog lime light.Go after prominant people.He has a personal grudge against Congress and he is considered a BJP man.He needs to prove himself in the logn run before he randomly selects people for accusations.Mr Raman an RSS man will support anything or anybody who is anti-Congress.All have their motives and they only camouflage.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT