Sharoon is among the hundreds from the slum settlement of Jahangirpuri, in northwest Delhi, who are protesting against government plans to remove ration supplies from fair price shops or PDS outlets and instead ‘empower’ people by giving the subsidy amount as cash transfers directly into their bank accounts. With 13 members in the family to feed, Sharoon puts it rather bluntly: “In our house, the money could end up being used for something else, given the many demands. I’d prefer to get rations.”
On since June, the agitation by poor families from the jhuggi-jhonpri clusters, or JJ colonies as they are known, of Jahangirpuri, has stalled the Delhi government’s plans to replicate the pilot project carried out last year in Raghubir Nagar in west Delhi organised by sewa Bharat, funded by the UNDP. Female heads of 100 families were provided Rs 1,000 each in their bank accounts with the freedom to buy what they liked.
Almost all of them reported they were happy with the experience, says Renana Jhabvala of sewa Bharat. The report compiled by sewa states that the PDS outlets in the colony started functioning well. There was no drop in the food items consumed by the families, with many even buying eggs or meat with the money. Households with elderly members, in particular, were reported to have used the funds for medical care. “What we have recommended is a policy of choice, and of not immediately jumping into cash transfers,” says Jhabvala.
Despite the continuing protests in Jahangirpuri, the Delhi government is moving ahead with plans to provide two lakh vulnerable families with Rs 600 in cash transfers every month. A total of Rs 144 crore has been allocated for the project to be implemented in 920 jhuggi-jhonpri clusters across the state.
There have been other protests—Ashok Khandelwal, an advisor to the commissioners of the Supreme Court, stresses that his study of cash transfers in place of subsidised kerosene sale in Kotkasim block of Ajmer has revealed that “those who really need it stand deprived”. Even ten months after the start of the pilot scheme, 10,000 out of 25,000 eligible families don’t have no-frills bank accounts, Aadhar or UID number, and so are kept deprived. The operation of the scheme is so cumbersome that a large number of families are not availing the subsidised kerosene. All the sarpanches in the area have jointly filed a PIL and 34 PDS shop-owners have refused to lift kerosene during the last five months. As Khandelwal puts it, the scheme is resulting in “deprivation by design!”
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT