In the history of the East India Company and the British Raj, they don’t merit even a footnote. Yet it’s worth wondering if the men who ran the Empire would have lasted three centuries on the subcontinent if they hadn’t found mates who shared their spunk and spirit. In The Fishing Fleet: Husband-Hunting in the Raj, Anne de Courcy tries to do the right thing by the British women who made India their home with fortitude and grace. At the end of it, however, the reader may find themselves agreeing with the oversight, instead of questioning it.
That is not to undermine these young women, first inveigled to India with annual allowances of £300 in the late 17th century, and then—as word spread that there were four eligible English men for each English woman in the subcontinent—forced to pay a premium of £200 for each passage. Anyone daring to make the epic sea journey in search of a home in a strange country is worth more than passing respect. However, by aligning her own lens to their personal perspective as husband-hunters, De Courcy creates a sweeping narrative that mostly showcases easily accessed stories and exotic superficiality, while sacrificing possible gains in serious insight and accuracy.
The principal source material for the book is the vivid memoirs penned by many members of the fishing-for-a-husband fleet. The result is a mass of fascinating trivia. Did you know that all English people wore flannel undergarments, even in 40-degree summers, under doctors’ orders? Or that, in god-forsaken outposts, a girl could keep her date only on camel-back? Or that, alongside the hectic parties, the magnificent dinners at the local maharaja’s, the endless tiger hunts, the Calcutta-Simla-Calcutta rounds, the only constant of life in an English bubble was boredom?
The unrelenting focus on froth makes The Fishing Fleet play out like an elaborate comedy of manners in a faux England. While Raj life was impossibly regimented and possibly preoccupied with appearances, De Courcy doesn’t delve beneath the diary descriptions to explore the subtle engagements of these Englishwomen with their environment or their employees.
The soft legacy of the Raj was evident in Anglo-Indian cuisine, the social responsibility of the ICS wives (inherited by the likes of Kamaladevi Chattopadhyay), in strains of music and art, even in women’s fashion and sport. De Courcy devotes exactly three bracketed lines to “cooks working in primitive conditions and with no knowledge of what a dish should taste like” to explain the Curzons’ “largely English” table, and a paragraph to three women who pushed the Raj envelope. Since the cooks are unlikely to have had a natural-born acquaintance with iced soups and filet de boeuf a la banquantine, it’s tough to see why De Courcy doesn’t explore the domestic dissemination of women power.
Equally, there’s no mention of the rampant promiscuity of lonely memsahibs (hardly the stuff of memoirs, though one such dalliance with an Indian sweeper allegedly influenced the opposition to the Ilbert Bill), or of the English ‘underclasses’ of milliners, hairdressers and embroiderers, who also made their way to India on ship.
After some 300 pages, the author asks: “Did the Fishing Fleet girls have any real influence on the conduct of affairs in this vast country?.... The short answer is no.” The reader may be tempted to agree, but that verdict would be more a reflection on this incomplete book than on the Fishing Fleet itself.
The print version of this article stated "Curzons’ “largely English” cuisine" which has been corrected online to "Curzons’ “largely English” table"
The feminist author critiqued by another feminist, gives no opportunity for criticism.
The moaning that females were lesser in India in the times of the Raj, takes the cake. After sending their males to the risky frontlines, now the feminists have found virtue in the 'sacrifice' of not going to the frontline!
And oh, could nt the authoress summed up the book with just one sentence : "Men marry for the sex and women marry for the money " ( and spared us of all the moaning )
I didn't know the white sahibs had such a boring life in India.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT