Two ideas to break the current deadlock in India’s politics—make Sonia Gandhi prime minister or change the Opposition. The first idea is mine and is unlikely to be realised. It would be too much of a gamble for the Gandhi family, though; it throws up some dynastic issues. The second comes from a frustrated foreign stockbroker in Mumbai. He wants an early general election since it would (probably) get rid of the debilitating BJP as the main Opposition. We were discussing the current political and parliamentary stalemate with the Opposition stalling Parliament for more days than it allows it to operate. I wondered why corporates spent so much time attacking the government when they know there is no better alterative. If, I argued, they are hoping for a tough Narendra Modi-led BJP government, they’d probably be disappointed since a general election would produce a coalition with even less sense of direction than the current Congress-(un)led government.
Ah yes, said my Mumbai friend, but you would change the Opposition! I was amazed. Have you ever heard of anyone wanting an election so as to oust the Opposition? But, when you think about it, it is not such a crazy idea because, even though it is currently fashionable—and fairly so—to blame the weak Manmohan Singh-Sonia Gandhi leadership plus the tantrums of the coalition for the government’s inability to get things done, a lot of the blame must go to the BJP for blocking Parliament.
The Congress has a leadership crisis, despite many pundits still believing that Rahul Gandhi, 42-year-old heir to both dynasty and party, will emerge as a viable prime ministerial candidate for the general election in 2014. Rahul though has such a downbeat demeanour that it’s hard to see him leading anything. He indicated in July that he was ready to play a larger role, but he’s been notable since then mostly for his absence from day-to-day politics. What he’s prepared to do might become clearer later this month when long-awaited ministerial and party leadership appointments are expected, but he certainly isn’t a realistic prime ministerial candidate at this time. There are no other obvious names, assuming Manmohan, who turns 80 this month, retires in 2014, and given the party’s seeming devotion to dynastic dominance.
Maybe the Congress doesn’t see the need for change. Since it expects to lose the 2014 election, it is probably logical not to name a prime ministerial candidate, but to go into the election campaign led by Sonia Gandhi, Rahul and the current ministers. It can then decide what to do about its leadership when a coalition government is being formed and it picks the potential partners it prefers to work with. The family could also decide, after seeing how Rahul performs in the election campaign, whether to bring Priyanka, Rahul’s more personable sister, into active politics. It would be much braver however to announce—maybe middle of next year if not before—that Manmohan Singh is retiring immediately and that Sonia is to become PM (providing of course she is well enough). When she declined the job in 2004, she arguably did not have the necessary experience. She does now, and would probably do a better job than Rahul, if only because she is in total command of the party, as she has shown in recent weeks.
Open government would improve as well. As PM, she would be answerable publicly for policies, notably on the economy, that she currently pushes from behind the scenes but never has to defend, and for cabinet members’ corruption. But it would almost certainly be too much of a gamble for the dynasty. Everything that Sonia has done in the past 15 to 20 years shows that she sees her role primarily as a bridge between her late husband, Rajiv, and Rahul. Her aim is to ensure that the dynasty survives, and she has been much more candid and determined about naming her successor than any earlier member of the dynasty. She has also not tried to become India’s top leader. Given her Italian origins, that has possibly been a logical stance, but my hunch is that she may nevertheless now be the Congress’s best chance of avoiding appalling defeat in 2014.
If she failed as PM, it would be a dangerous setback for the dynasty and could encourage rumblings in the Congress for a non-Gandhi leader. That, of course, would be a good thing because near-automatic dynastic rule and family succession isn’t good for democracy. Dynasties don’t take such gambles with their futures, so it almost certainly won’t happen, and will instead become a “What If” question asked by future generations. “What if Sonia had shaken off her cautious courtiers and had made herself prime minister by 2014?”
(Delhi-based foreign correspondent John Elliott has a current affairs blog at https://ridingtheelephant.wordpress.com/
Pankaj Jethi >> Or another thing 'mam g' can do is to appoint another of her household assistant or servant to the pm' s post.
Good Idea. I would personally like our Diggy Baba(Digvijay singh) take the post of PM. In any case, we Indians are destined to the incompetent governance of UPA till 2014. Diggy baba will do his best to make this even more worse, but he can guarantee us to a strong dose of daily laughter and humour. When everything looks gloomy, we need a comedian to forget our mess. Who else but Diggy Baba can do that best?
Or another thing 'mam g' can do is to appoint another of her household assistant or servant to the pm' s post. After all she has a penchant for selecting her trusted people to constitutional positions, like pratibha patil,hamid ansari,naveen chawla,manmohan ji etc.
I have a very big doubt about manmohan ji, was he working as 'mam g's personal ca before becoming pm. It fits perfectly.......
Too idiotic an article to bother with still in the interest of placing actual facts here goes:
Majority of the 1 billion Indians don't want an Italian as PM, especially an uneducated housewife (smart enough to have married a PM's son of a third world nation to escape poverty), not to mention that she who lived (and travelled extensively abroad at Indian taxpayers' expence) at the mother-in-law PM's residential house for 17 years without bothering to take Indian citizenship, not to mention that she ditched her mother-in-law and ran with her husband Rajiv and children after her mother-in-law's autocratical emergency ended to her country Italy's embassy.
Looks like the writer's stockbroker friend would like to see BJP banned as a political party - not surprising : both crony capitalists and Lefties and 'intellectuals' would rather see India bankrupt by siphoning all money to Swizerland and other tax havens than have BJP. Such is their hatred for HIndus and colonial mindset.
We got rid of authoritarian and corrupt Indira and her son Sanjay after Emergency, we got rid of corrupt Rajiv after Bofors defence scam and we will get rid of Sonia and Manmohan and India will prosper again.
Just need the BJP to put their petty differences for the Country's good like they did under JaiPrakash narayan and Vajpayee.
In the wisdom of a famous Bihari/Bhojpuri saying .... "gayil (apni) bhainswa (tho) paani mein".
It is interesting to note that Congress Party, gave India two, yes two prime ministers outside of the Nehru-Indira-Rajiv-Sonia dynasty family.
The two gentlemen , were also undoubtedly the best Prime Ministers to rule India.
But the dynasty has done everything to bury the legacy of these two prime ministers.
How many statues and monuments are named in India after LB Shastri and PV Narasimha Rao?
LB Shastri died a very mysterios death and we still have no convincing reply as to whether it was a natural death or a murder !!!
PVNR completed his full term but was accused of so many scams and scandals which could all be true but these accusations could not be logically concluded and the man was politically erased from the memory of Congress once Saint Sonia took over the party directly in March 1998. And he died in 2004, unremembered.
Will we be 3rd time lucky post 2014 ? HOw about a genuine, non dynasty congress man/woman in charge of India's principal opposition party post 2014, who refuses to bow to the family?
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT