Should a newspaperman tell? This is always a difficult decision to make because, in the process of speaking out, he runs the risk of annoying somebody, somewhere. In the case of the government in India, the tendency to hide and feel horrified once the truth is uncovered is greater than in an individual. This is apparently so because, in official jargon, “repercussions” are wider. But what are these “repercussions”, and who assesses them? Such questions are never answered.
Somehow, those who occupy high positions labour under the belief that they—and they alone—know what the nation should be told and when. And they get annoyed if news they do not like appears in print. Their first reaction is to contradict it and dub it mischievous. Later, when they realise that a mere denial will not convince even the most gullible, a lame explanation is offered: things have not been put “in proper perspective”. Sometimes, the government gets away with its version of the story. More often, it loses credibility. Governments cannot afford to have even an iota of doubt raised about what they say or do. Somehow, New Delhi is not conscious of this fact.
Beyond the Lines is a current history of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, and I have described how the three countries were born in blood. Some commentators have questioned why August 15 was chosen as the day of independence. Lord Mountbatten’s press officer told me that Mountbatten had selected that particular date because it was the day the Japanese surrendered to the Allies, ending World War II. Mountbatten remembered hearing the news of the Japanese surrender in Churchill’s room and hoped to associate Britain’s ‘surrender’ to India with himself playing a leading role. Some British Foreign Office hands disagreed and said Mountbatten was lobbying for a more senior position in the Royal Navy and did not want his appointment in India to block his aspirations. He eventually got the appointment he sought as naval commander of Southeast Asia in 1955.
The big controversy in India has been that surrounding the death of prime minister Lal Bahadur Shastri at Tashkent. I had no doubt he had died of heart failure until a few years later, when a Lok Sabha member said in the house that Shastri had been poisoned. T.N. Kaul was then foreign secretary and, at the time of Shastri’s death, he was the ambassador to the Soviet Union. My doubt increased when Kaul badgered me to issue a statement that Shastri’s death was due to heart failure. I did not listen to him but his persistent demands made me wonder if Shastri’s death was really due to heart failure. Since I had been press officer to home minister Govind Ballabh Pant and home minister Lal Bahadur Shastri, who later became prime minister, I was privy to a lot of inside information. My latest book reveals what happened behind the scenes during those years. All I can tell my critics is that the events unfolding at that time confirm what I have written.
Narasimha Rao’s son has contradicted me about his father’s attitude, as prime minister, over the Babri demolition. I have written that Rao sat in puja all through the demolition. One of Rao’s officials says he was in constant touch with Rao and the latter was as concerned as anybody else. I have not commented on the extent of Rao’s concern, but stated how, during the demolition, he was not available. This has been confirmed by the late minister Arjun Singh.
In a free society, the press has a duty to inform the public without fear or favour. At times it is an unpleasant job, but it has to be done because a free society is founded on free information. It’s as simple as that.
I read Kuldip Nayar’s column (Stories Within Stories, Sep 17) with interest. Though I have not read Nayar’s books, it’s interesting to note that he assumes whatever was told to him by various people was true. How does he know Tahira Mazhar told him the truth about Jinnah, or that she knew anything at all? How does he really know that Mountbatten chose August 15 as India’s Independence day out of ulterior motives? Sure, many people may have little incentive to lie, but their many predilections often make them distort reality. But then, journalists often become prisoners of their own biases and perspectives that they think are ‘right’.
Anwaar >> On authenticity of historical trivia I would put Kuldip Nayar above any of his critics.
Birds of Same Feather, Flock Together !!!
Narasimha Rao transformed a country where every Indian was fighting another with empty stomachs (due to short sighted and divisive outloook of our leaders) to a position where we started dreaming about a ecnomically strong India. But what a massive fall! Today we are again started discussions on divisive agenda reminiscing the pre Rao days. How can we get talend leaders if we diminish and degradie talent by spreading rumors to further our political biases?
On authenticity of historical trivia I would put Kuldip Nayar above any of his critics.
Narsimha Rao was just ignorin fools like Arjun Singh and Kuldeep Nayar while tryin to diffuse situation
Kuldip Nayar's accusations against Late PV Narasimha Rao, based only on heresay rumours and information from a corrupt politician like Arjun Singh only show the extent Mr Nayar will descend to support his political biases. An Unethical person like Kuldip Nayar only deserves the maximum contempt from all of us.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT