Some basic research and investigation by us in India Against Corruption earlier this year revealed that at least 15 senior ministers of the Union cabinet, including the prime minister, Pranab Mukherjee and P. Chidambaram had serious charges of corruption or worse pending against them. This malaise is representative of the entire political class, underlines the need for an independent Lokpal and also explains the determined efforts by them to thwart it. It also showed not only why the country was being looted and bled dry, but also why revolts, insurgencies and ethnic conflicts were breaking out all over the country and the administration was collapsing. The country seems headed for anarchy and civil war. To highlight the alarming situation, it was decided that some of us would sit on an indefinite fast for the setting up of an independent Special Investigation Team headed by three retired Supreme Court judges to investigate these charges.
Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and Gopal Rai were joined by hundreds of other fasting volunteers and, after four days, by Anna Hazare at Jantar Mantar. After eight days of the fast, the government’s response was an arrogant stonewalling of the demand. Their refrain was the same as on the Jan Lokpal bill. In short they said: we are the elected representatives, and we will decide whether any investigation is to be done. Unelected members of civil society have no right to demand any investigation or any law. It became clear therefore that fasting or public demonstrations, even by large masses of people, would not yield any result.
Seeing this, 23 very eminent citizens including Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer, General V.K. Singh, Admiral Tahiliani, Justice Santosh Hegde and others, issued a statement calling upon our fasting volunteers not to risk their lives at the altar of an insensitive government. They urged them to create a political alternative which could usher in a different kind of politics in the country, based on decentralisation of power and people’s direct participation in decision-making, policy-making and law-making. Anna Hazare immediately responded to the appeal saying he wanted to know what the people in the country felt about this. Several media organisations immediately started sms and online polls. We too asked the people to express their views on this.
Many taunts have been thrown at us since this decision was announced at Jantar Mantar. Politicians and ministers who were earlier telling us we could not dictate terms on the Lokpal bill to the “elected representatives”, that we needed to get elected before we had the locus to demand anything, now taunted us saying they always knew we had political ambitions. Many well-wishers said this decision would destroy the anti-corruption movement, that we would lose whatever traction we had. But the fact is, so many people supported the idea of a political alternative because they felt the Lokpal campaign had hit a brick wall—for those in power felt they need not respond to public opinion, outside the mainstream political parties, without money and muscle power, they feared no challenge to them in electoral politics. Thus, an independent Lokpal was not likely to happen even if over 80 per cent people asked for it, since those in power fear going to jail as a result.
Some people say we should accept the government’s Lokpal, that it is at least an incremental step forward. Unfortunately, small incremental steps will not succeed in reversing the steep descent of the country into anarchy. Unless we can do something drastic to reverse this slide, we will soon be overtaken by conditions of civil war. The portents are there for all to see. Apart from the Maoist insurgency in adivasi areas, we see farmer unrests across the country on land acquisitions. While the Planning Commission debates on whether `28 a day makes a person well off, 2,00,000 farmers committed suicide over the last 15 years. The simmering discontent among industrial labour is visible everywhere and could erupt in the kind of violence we saw at the Maruti factory.
At the root of all this is the inequity of decisions, policies and laws being made by the government and Parliament, most of which are driven by corruption and vested commercial interests. All this is being facilitated by the centralisation of power denuding people of any role in decision-making; the devaluation of democracy to just voting for our representatives once in five years; the topdown control of institutions of governance with no accountability to the people.
Changing all this requires not merely robust institutions to check corruption, such as an independent Jan Lokpal, but also legislative changes to facilitate decentralised, participatory democracy, fundamental structural reforms in our institutions of governance, such as the police, the civil services, the judiciary, to fashion them as instruments of service to the people and accountable to them rather than as instruments of control over them.
Since those in power today are the beneficiaries of this system, they are unwilling to change this. The only non-violent way left of doing this is through an electoral revolution which sweeps away the present corrupted mainstream political parties and puts in Parliament a formation committed to this revolutionary vision of a different kind of engagement between the state and the people.
Most people’s movements or committed individuals have fared badly in their foray into electoral politics, for they have been unable to demonstrate the capacity to mobilise large sections of people across the country. People therefore do not see them as viable and credible players, and vote for the lesser evil among the established parties. The enormous public support for the anti-corruption movement has laid the foundation for it being perceived as a credible force for ushering in such an electoral revolution.
For this to succeed, however, it will need the preparation of a vision and agenda which is truly revolutionary and yet practical. It will require the setting up of an organisation formulated differently from other political parties, where people volunteer and participate not for office or power, but because of their concern for the country. It will require a truly transparent and participatory method of selecting candidates which ensures that only those who are honest, have a record of public service and share this vision of revolutionary systemic change, get selected. For all this to happen, it would require the participation and involvement of people and movements who are concerned about the state of affairs in the country. We hope all such people will come forward and participate in this revolutionary undertaking.
Apropos A Political Alternative To Alternative Politics (Sep 3), like-minded people can form a political association, but with the sole intent of curbing corruption. Once the task is accomplished, though, it must disband. There are too many parties taking the nation closer to chaos as it is.
Col Ranjit Sinha, Delhi
I’d be mighty surprised if the ex-Team Anna members win even a single seat come the elections. Cantankerous casteism, religious mumbo- jumbo and regional jingoism are too effective tools in the practised hands of the corrupt. The people are too invested in such practices as well to support an honest candidate at the hustings.
What exactly is corruption, Mr Bhushan? How is buying land in a state where outsiders aren’t allowed to—and at lower rates—not corruption, while a scam-tainted minister being exonerated is?
Rishi Vyas, Kangra
Mr Bhushan, in trying to banish corruption, one must not ignore the deep roots it has grown in Indian society over thousands of years. One has to bring about a drastic change in the Indian mindset—lest you become a King Canute, commanding the tidal waves to stop.
R.V. Subramanian, Gurgaon
I’m interested to know how a ‘chaara ghotala’ happens. The Yadav community would take this to mean, doing ghotala with cows. And why would a Yadav—say Laloo Prasad—take the chaara of his cows and sell it in the market? Was he financing his party in this manner? The Yadav in Bihar shows great restraint in not laughing.
Aditya Mookerjee, Belgaum
The author’s intent of providing a political alternative is praiseworthy, but it’s been done before. The Loksatta Party, ring any bells? If today the country is a quagmire of corruption and ordered anarchy, much of the credit goes to the Indian middle class, which has become very comfortable in its amoral pursuit of money and spinelessness.
Arun Kumar, London
I agree with Prashant Bhushan (A Political Alternative to Alternative Politics, Sep 3). Corruption and bad governance are leading to anarchy and pushing the country into a dark age. Not only the rich, who loot the country with impunity, even the poor often expect undue favours and expect to make a fast buck. What’s the way out? Whether Anna Hazare or Team Anna can fit the large shoes of giants like Gandhi will be judged by time and people.
Arvind, Prashant, Anna baba
My heart goes out to you for the 'self' you ae burning, to fight a system that is pretty opressive.
All of you need our support and blessings.......and not this abuse piled on your head.
I hope you guys succeed somewhat, but for me there is no doubt you are modern 'kraantikaaris'.
Ofcourse, none is justified in deriding the war against corruption,the Team Anna has declared, let alone its pressing the pause button for scores of reasons.The problem is to identify the root cause of the dreaded virus "corruption" that eats into the vitals of our economy. To turn guns on the corrupt individuals of the political spectrum,sparing the policies which breed corruption, will not show the way. We feel our goal is achieved, when the corrupt are put behind the bars. The illegal wealth is not recovered to reach our national kitty. It is all the policies of globalisation pursued by NDA and UPA for two decades,that plays villainy. It has spawned huge disconnect between the indigent and the opulent. Official Statistics abound. The lucky stars are too choosy to smile at 50 billioners in India, what if crores retire to bed with hungry intestines. A teethy Lok Pal indeed will ofcourse do magic, to nail the dirt to some extent, but it is not the be all and end all. To rejig our path to ensure fair distribution of economic progress , though not equitable is the need of the hour.
I'll be mightily surprised if the ex-India Against Corruption members win even a single seat in the elections. The corrupt people of this nation are too much into cantankerous casteism, religious mumbo jumbo, and regional jingoism, besides their national pastime of fleecing fellow-citizens, to ever seriously consider supporting an honest candidate at the hustings. After all, people get the government they deserve.
you are underestimating your ability as civil society who stages dharna
you are overestimating your ability to stage a political alternative.
Indians are not ready for this.
You will cause unmeasurable damage to this movement if you go forming a political party. Think 100 times!!!
Mr Bhushan, in trying to banish corruption one cannot ignore the firm roots it has developed in the Indian Society over thousands of years. One has to bring about a drastic change in the Indian Mindset. Otherwise you would be commanding the tidal waves to stop like King Canute.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT