“When I was in Std III, the textbook prescribed under the Maharashtra school curriculum, Thoranchi Olakh (Introduction to Elders), had essays on our political leaders. Nehru and Gandhi were introduced as leaders of national stature, but Jyotibha Phule and B.R. Ambedkar were referred to as leaders of the untouchables. We would often compare the treatment given to political leaders in our textbooks.”
—Prof Y.S. Alone, Jawaharlal Nehru University
—Prof Y.S. Alone, Jawaharlal Nehru University
The professor may not have been alone in wondering as a child why Ambedkar was seldom described as anything more than the leader of the depressed castes. But teachers, most of them drawn from the forward castes, would possibly have given the matter hardly any thought. When the recent cartoon controversy broke out, Dalits said they could not but read it against the long history of exclusion—from textbooks—of one of the greatest leaders of India. It’s a dilemma they have always been aware of: while Ambedkar is seen as the tallest national leader from among the depressed castes, his representation in pedagogy has always been parenthetical, as a leader of a subset, not of the whole, as if his intellectual heft and his grand achievement—making equality and justice the cornerstones of a fledgling nation—were not enough to earn him a place in the national pantheon.
Think back to your schooldays, when students readily digested the life and times of Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru in text and poem, skit and song. Ambedkar would appear but briefly, if at all. Annual days would see someone or the other dress up as a Gandhi or a Nehru. Few would remember someone dressing up as Ambedkar, suited, bespectacled, a copy of the Constitution in hand.
Till recently, school textbooks did not even have chapters on the Constitution and its importance as an instrument of social change. After the controversy over Shankar’s old cartoon—which depicted Nehru in a seemingly domineering position vis-a-vis Ambedkar—being included in the NCERT social sciences textbook for Std XI, textbooks are being recast. The authors of most textbooks, till the new curriculum was envisaged a few years ago, had either been nationalist historians or Marxist historians. For both, Ambedkar was no more than an architect of the Constitution. Historians of both hues had ideological problems with accepting Ambedkar fully—and, it might be added, as befits his monumental achievements.
For the Marxists, Ambedkar is cast in caste, and hence in conflict with their class theories. This was perhaps compounded by the fact that the most influential ones came from affluent, upper-caste backgrounds. For “nationalist” historians, on the other hand, those who opposed Gandhi or Nehru were outside the pale of recognition. Between these two schools of thought, Ambedkar was diminished in stature.
“For the Left, he’s been a community leader, not a class leader or a leader of the subalterns,” says political thinker Imtiaz Ahmed. “Hence the dilemma in according Ambedkar a prominent place.” According to Ahmed, as one of the most creative individuals who made a substantial contribution to a nation’s life, Ambedkar should have occupied an exalted position. But this wasn’t to be: textbook-writing and teaching has for long been the preserve of the upper castes.
Somehow, there has been no reasoned debate on the Poona Pact affair—Ambedkar’s demand for a separate electorate for Dalits, which Mahatma Gandhi opposed with a fast unto death and finally had his way with. This has led to Ambedkar being projected as anti-Hindu, anti-India and anti-Gandhi. It’s a view that has only been reinforced by textbooks, according to Alone. Textbooks have been remarkably silent too on issues of human rights and the right to live with dignity. In fact, these subjects were hardly discussed in schools: absent in textbooks, absent in discussion.
But all along, the much-derided realm of competitive and caste politics ensured that Ambedkar never left the public discourse. Reservations brought new caste combinations in public life, and ‘Jai Bhim’ became the rallying cry of the newly assertive marginalised masses. Says Anand Teltumbde, who teaches at IIT Kharagpur, “Marxists have been dogmatic and haven’t come out of their ideological shell. They still view Ambedkar as a liberal petit bourgeois, and their discomfort in giving him a place in the history books stems from this. They always tried to belittle Ambedkar as only a Dalit leader, nay, even as a sub-caste leader, a Mahar leader.” It is perhaps this inability to reconcile Ambedkar’s caste identity in the social framework that largely led to his marginalisation in textbooks.
What is changing now is how the discourse on social justice and discrimination is coming to the foreground all over again as an assertive Dalit class looks upon Ambedkar as its symbol, coercing forward castes to look upon him beyond caste and place him the context of human rights and its abuse. As Teltumbde says, “If you look at it historically, they tried ignoring Ambedkar. When they realised that he has become an icon for 25 per cent of the population, which was potentially dangerous, they started to co-opt him by taking him into the Constituent Assembly, making him the chairman of the drafting committee, giving him a cabinet berth etc. But, after he died they began ignoring his legacy.”
A similar coopting of Ambedkar in politics began in the 1970s with the resurgence of caste parties, which realised it was profitable to iconise him. It’s a measure of their new clout that the cartoon controversy stalled Parliament, saw a rare ‘consensus’, and forced a review of textbooks. While many saw this as petty politics, it was perhaps for the first time that Ambedkar’s place in textbooks was debated. But history, as Teltumbde says, follows its own dialectics. Even as the debate rages over cartoons, hopefully, when books are written again, human rights, discrimination and justice will find a place in discussion and debate. And Ambedkar’s place of pride will be beyond doubt.
I don't believe why people can not see it. Ambedkar got so many votes only because of dalits unanimously voting for him.It is evident from the fact that the two dalit leaders topped the poll. Kashi Ram was second in the number of votes for 50 greatest indians. it is not possible as most of the people don't even know about kashi ram.Thus ambedkar has got this position only because of dalits unanimously voting for him.
Now, regarding Nehru as great is the greatest foolishness on earth.Most of the problems faced by our country are the child of nehru.This man was ashamed of indian culture.He started the trend of dynasty in indian politics.He is the most overrated man in freedom struggle and politics.
The author, true to the leanings of Outlook refuses to point out that the problem since 1947 is that all our school text books are edited only to sing songs and glories about Jawaharlal Nehru and his family successors. It is not just BR Ambedkar.. every freedom fighter other than MK Gandhi and JL Nehru(and family) were ignored and are not given the right coverage and space in our textbooks.
The entire education system in India has been tutored and tailored to create a Nehru worshipping cult. Good example is way JL nehru birthday is celebrated as children's day. Come on, what exactly did JL Nehru do for children? His policies and economic ideas are the reason why India did not focus on primary education, healthcare and family planning and that is also reason why millions of Indian children are undernourished, illiterate and uncared. Children's day on 14 Nov? What a crude joke?
Although I don’t believe in comparing Great people, because all of them (Babasaheb, Mahatmaji, Panditji, Sardar Patel etc) are Great in their own way, but since the survey has been done I thought of writing (In fact I am writing to any media site for the first time).
There is no doubt that Babasaheb is greater than even Mahatma Gandhi if you stretch your minds for coming 100 years. Mahatma Gandhi fought struggle for Independence which was just 100 years old, where as Babasaheb fought for social Independence which was more than a few thousand years old. By passage of time this cause will emerge as bigger cause than what we are thinking because it is beyond imagination of everyone. Today I was listening to a debate which was at 10 PM (16/08/2012) on your channel where BJP person was talking about Babasaheb as merely Chairman of the drafting Committee. OMG….. LOL…this is what taught in the school (I too teach my kids same thing because it’s in the school syllabus). I just feel pity on his knowledge about Babsaheb, but it’s not his fault. How many people have really studied Babasaheb or taken him seriously. There is a generation growing up silently, who don’t want to get into any kind of controversy but is a great admirer of Babasaheb and you do n no of polls u will get the same result. People talk openly against thoughts of Babasaheb, they don’t realize with whom they are talking. A person sitting next to you may be admirer of Babasaheb. They don’t want to argue because with how many people u will argue. Moreover what’s the point in convincing him, who doesn’t know abc of Babasaheb. It will take time for people to understand Babasaheb. Society has not yet matured enough to understand Babasheb.
Babasaheb was not only the father of the constitution but was also Great Social reformer, scholar, economist, lawyer, religious reformist, educationist etc. Just wait for another 50 years n u will realize what I am saying.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT