It’s a tale with age-old contours. Sanjiv Chaturvedi, the upright junior officer of the Indian Forest Service who the government of Haryana hounded for the last five years, can work in peace. His fight against corruption, and the vindictiveness of the politico-bureaucratic set-up, is now a case study for trainees at three premier academies for civil servants and police officers. This, even as the state government tries its best to prevent a CBI probe into a ‘fake plantation scam’ Chaturvedi unearthed.
Chaturvedi has been transferred 12 times in the six years of his service, has had three ‘bogus’ FIRs lodged against him, faced four inquiries by the Vigilance Bureau, as well as a suspension and a chargesheet under major penalty, which leads to dismissal from service. Today, when the much-feted Chaturvedi lectures trainee officers on ‘Anti-Corruption Strategies’, he feels vindicated. Chaturvedi was ranked second in the IFS examination and won two special medals for excellence while on training. His nightmare began when, at his first posting in Kurukshetra, he registered an FIR against contractors working on the construction of the Hansi Butana canal near the Saraswati Wild Life Sanctuary for poaching rare species of hog deer. He also objected to the illegal transportation, destruction of habitat and felling of trees. He drew the attention of his superiors to the 2000 Supreme Court order that prohibits digging canals within a sanctuary without its clearance. For his pains, Chaturvedi was transferred to Fatehabad and served a severe warning by the principal secretary, forests. In August 2007, on the same issue, a proposal for placing him under suspension was moved on grounds of “insubordination”.
Curiously, after Chaturvedi was suspended, the Haryana forest department sanctioned prosecution of the violators based on the damage reports filed by him. A Delhi-based NGO, Wildlife Trust of India, moved the SC over rules being flouted inside the sanctuary. When the violations were proved, the state government hastily deposited Rs 1 crore for conservation works, before the central empowered committee of the SC could impose a penalty. Haryana spent Rs 2.21 crore from the public exchequer on lawyers to protect the violators.
After a vengeful Haryana refused to relieve him for a year, an order from the ministry of forests and environment in May this year overruled it, which enabled Chaturvedi to move to Delhi, where he is the deputy director at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences.
Chaturvedi’s crusade against corruption wrecked his personal life—he went through a divorce. But his biggest reward in this journey through purgatory was the knowledge that “contrary to the perception that states have total power over officers of all-India services, the All India Service rules provide statutory protection for us against the kind of intimidation I faced.” Chaturvedi’s presentation on that, as exemplified by his own story, got a standing ovation at the IAS training academy at Mussoorie last month. Though Chaturvedi is permitting himself to smile once again, his story shows potential whistle-blowers like him have a bruising battle ahead of them.
Apropos Old Jungle Saying (Aug 13), we can do with a few more ‘men of steel’ like Sanjiv Chaturvedi to inject some life into the ‘steel frame’ of the Indian bureaucracy.
Kudos to you, Mr Chaturvedi. I hope there will be more bureaucrats like you in the future.
We need more more men of 'steel' like him to put some life back into the 'steel frame' of the Indian bureaucracy!
Hats off, sir, and sorry to learn about the cost you paid in your personal life.
This is truly what is meant by the "Steel Frame".
While it was truly uplifting to read of Shri Chaturvedi's actions, it was equally saddening to read of his personal life. May we, very humbly, hope that Shri Chaturvedi has overcome the trauma of his divorce and will be blessed with happiness in his personal life.
Shri Chaturvedi brings to mind a couplet taught to us as schoolchildren:
"Do thy duty which is best - leave unto thy Lord the rest" or "Karmanya vadhikaraste ma phaleshu kadachana"
Sanjiv Chaturvedi is lucky. Yes, he is lucky because he's survived -- both physically and morally-- the persecution and prosecutions which corrupt and vengeful governments in our country routinely inflict on the few honest people who stray into government service.He's avoided the fate of those honest people who either "learn to look the other way " or else desert the service in disgust, commit suicide, go insane, with many even being killed by the bribe-givers whose scams and loot they dared to expose.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT