Rajesh Khanna was Indian cinema’s first superstar, in the real sense of the term. Before him there were great stars like Saigal and P.C Barua in the 1930s and 40s, and then Dilip Kumar, Raj Kapoor and Dev Anand in the next era. But Rajesh Khanna was of another order.
The hysteria and fan-following lasted till much after he married a much younger actor, at the height of his career. His co-star, Sharmila Tagore, opposite whom he gave his biggest hits, is on record saying that she had never seen anything like the Rajesh Khanna craze. She was an established star and he still a relative newcomer when they starred in their first film together, Shakti Samanta’s Aradhana in 1969. What happened next was history. He spawned a female fan following incomparable to any. Film star Bindu recently said in a TV programme that she once saw girls leave his car covered with lipstick marks.
Like the true temperamental star, he had a meteoric rise, was in the high heavens for awhile, and then fell as sharply. Unlike Amitabh Bachchan, his co-star in hits like Anand and Namak Haram, who showed his staying power, ruling over the film industry for a good part of three decades, Rajesh Khanna fell sharply and by the advent of the 1980s was getting passed over for younger heroes.
The Rajesh Khanna phenomenon came at a unique and transitional moment of Hindi cinema, the decade of the 1960s, spilling into the early 1970s. It is a period in Indian film history which hasn’t received as much attention from researchers and writers as have the periods immediately preceding and the decade that followed. It was an era of immense versatility, which however remains sandwiched between, and overwhelmed by, the post-independence era of the 1950s— the era of Raj Kapoor and his contemporaries, and the iconic angry young man years of the 1970s and 80s. Rajesh Khanna epitomized that versatility of his age in his entire persona, on and off screen. He starred in a range of films, where he was the suave wooer of women, the fragile tragic hero in the mould of Barua or Saigal’s Devdas, and the classic Hollywood style urbane operator in super-hits like The Train. He could emote, he could dance and he could be both tragic and comic.
The Rajesh Khanna phenomenon held ground until the Hindi film hero became an almost uni-dimensional fighting-killing machine by the 80s. Rajesh Khanna’s waning away also signalled a certain standardizing of Hindi films. Unlike with Rajesh Khanna, who was used in remarkably different ways by directors as diverse as Hrishikesh Mukherjee and Shakti Samanta, the period that followed increasingly saw the making of a very specific ‘formula’ for success. Off screen, as well, he was unpredictable, famous for turning up late for shoots and starry tantrums, a contrast to Bachchan, who was known for his professionalism. Rajesh Khanna's relationships were as unpredictable— it seemed he cared very little for what the world thought about him. In every way, he was in the league of the classic star, don’t-carish, temperamental and full of charm when he wanted to be.
Rajesh Khanna epitomized romance, more than any other Hindi film hero. He was the urbane charmer who held sway before the underdog came to rule the roost of Hindi films. Khanna like his immediate predecessors and contemporaries Dev Anand and Shammi Kapoor embodied a kind of Hollywood-ish cosmopolitanism which few other heroes had. He wore trendy outfits, drove swanky cars and sported the lover-boy image. His heroines complemented him with their bouffants and stylish manners. Yet, he could also be the dhoti clad Bengali babu, reminiscent of an older school, in an Amar Prem. Even in his later years, when he switched to being a ‘character’ actor in films like Aakhir Kyon, where he starred with Smita Patil, he stood out for being different from the run-of-the mill industry product.
Perhaps Rajesh Khanna’s bonus and well as his bane was his lack of conformity to norms in any sense of the term. When he arrived with a bang it was because there had been no charmer so young and vulnerable looking before him. It was a quality that Shakti Samanta fully cultivated in the Roop Tera Mastana song, where he is alternatively overwhelmed by the heroine’s sexuality and then turns around to overwhelm her as well. And he probably lost his ground because of the same non-conformity, his inability to be the perfect professional with the very perfect public image.
Even in later life, he lived in greater solitude than many of his contemporaries, not appearing in many films or public events. When he appeared in his first commercial just months before his death, his shrunk frame and clearly failing health evoked a sharp response from fans. Today, the superstar has passed into history, secure that he would shine on forever in the pantheon of Hindi cinema.
Sharmistha Gooptu is a film scholar and Founding Trustee, South Asia Research Foundation
During my early teens, a television set was not an asset that every household owned. My Dad had booked an EC TV but it had a long waiting period. During those days watching Hindi movies on a Sunday evening was a craze. My father however frowned upon my running away to the only house in neighbourhood that had a TV set. On one of the Sundays, I slipped away quietly at 5:30 PM and returned home at 9 PM after watching 'Bawarchi' at my friend's place.
My half-yearly exams were to begin the next day and my father gave me a dressing down for giving more importance to a movie than to the exams.
I listened to my Dad with my head bent down in shame.
However I slipped away again a few weeks later to my friend's house to watch the Sunday movie. This time the movie was 'Anand'
Much to my surprise my Dad didn't say anything to me this time. He cancelled his EC TV booking and brought home a Texla B&W TV.
And as luck would have it, the first movie the following Sunday was Rajesh Khanna's ' Do Raastey'
Long Live kaka..may you find the ultimate peace that eluded you all your life.
Rajesh Khannas contribution to dousing anti Hindi sentiments in TN
Aradhana released in 1969-70. I had shifted to Chennai from Mumbai. I used to shuttle between Chennai and Mumbai. The film Aradhana was a craze then. One could not tickets for the film for wks in Mumbai. In Chennai the anti-Hindi agitation was only 5-6 yrs old, but Aradhana roared its songs in the heart of Chennaities. Somehow I made to Liltte Anand theatre where it was running to packed houses.
As soon as Meri Sapno ki Rani song arrived , there was delirious scenes in the small theatre as if a renaissance in learning Hindi had started. Then song after song , the audience lapped up to aura of Rajesh Khanna and the songs as if there was no anti-Hindi agitation had taken place. A soon as the show got over, outside there was a huge crowd singing " Roop Tera Mastana " in their own brand of Hindi.Aradhana ran for more than 100 wks at Little Anand in Chennai. It was no mean acheivement for a Hindi film to run after the riots for imposition of Hindi. The trio of Rajesh Khanna , SD Burman and Kishore Kumar with their immortal melodies did what the manipulative politicians will never will be able to achieve. RIP RK.
Hamne jo dekha tha suna tha…kya bataye wo kyat tha
Sapna salona tha…khatam to hona tha…huaa!!!
Rajesh Khanna was such a rarity who in the company of Kishore Kumar and RD/SD Burman and many talented artists created an undying beautiful art of cinema.
Rajesh Khanna lives on.
Biggest 1st superstar of Indian cinema...with major solo hits..."Rajesh Khanna R.I.P"
' Khamoshi'-that's the movie that set him apart as an actor of stealth and staggering emotional elegance.Of course every college going girl in the 70's had a crush on this debonair man's smile and swagger.
In the great wealth of cinema and the classic mood of muse and music one still recalls that ageless song:Humne dekhi he en ankhon ki mehek ki khushboo....those were celluloid days when directors created epiphanies out of dialogues and glances-when the sounds of silence said more than words-when words distilled the poetry of melancholy and when choices of narratives went beyond the mundane-to give us the prodigal-the pure-the milk of human kindness-when Rajesh Khanna was an actor who shone in the fulcrum of Bollywood's folklore and fragile matrix of moods. RIP RK...I would rather recall that smile and whiff of a gleam rather your shadow that lived in the past.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT