My earliest memory of Dara Singh is as Hanumanji in the Bollywood mythological Jai Bajrang Bali which we kids of the family saw together in a rapture on Doordarshan one afternoon. He made a jolly good, unusually comic Monkey King. One who didn't just fly all the way to Lanka to convey Ram's message to Seeta and set Raavan's city on fire but also sang merrily: Tere prabhu jaante hain baat ghat ghat ki, bajaye ja tu pyaare Hanuman chutki:
Dara Singh's Hanuman didn't just sing and dance, he was also a glutton who emptied Seeta's larder by perennially asking her for more food. "Mattaji prosiye" (spoken in thick Punjabi accent) was his constant demand to Seeta in this scene (1.06 onwards):
Dara Singh's interpretation of Hanuman was not classicist, nor picture perfect. It was about being himself in front of the camera. Dara Singh's Hanuman was bholaa bhaalaa. So was he himself. And we couldn't help warm up to the extremely funny, endearing, affectionate, guileless and innocent presence. We laughed uproariously and instantly fell in love with him. Dara Singh later went on to become Hanuman for an entire generation and played the idol in blockbuster TV serials like Ramayan, as also in one short scene in the Mahabharat:
The last film of his that I saw was Jab We Met (2007). He was Geet's strict grandfather Daarji who said those famous words: merii umr meiN ek jhalak meiN pataa chal jaataa hai ki laRke-laRkii ke biich kyaa ho rahaa hai... (46.21 onwards)
He was firm but loveable, good-natured and real. Like my own grandad. In Kal Ho Naa Ho (2003) he was the famous Chaddhaji of the Queens whose sweet, autumnal love story with Dadi Sushma Seth could bring a smile to the most humourless of audiences.
Be it as Hanuman then or as a patriarch later, Dara Singh was not a method actor who tried to get under the proverbial skin of the characters. He just brought a lot of himself to them, played it easy, simple and straight.
That's because Dara Singh was not an actor to begin with. He was a champion wrestler in the 50s and the 60s who participated in more than 500 bouts but never lost any -- that the matches were fixed or not didn't really matter. What mattered was that people wanted him to win -- and he did, convincingly. The Rustam-e-Hind's akhara adventures were keenly followed by the entire nation. How he threw King Kong out of the ring is stuff legends were made of. He defined macho in those days when WWF had not yet been conceived nor the term coined. His strong body, built on milk, butter and almonds than steroids, was what the Indian male aspired for long before six pack abs became a fad. He was the one to have taken his shirt off unpretentiously on screen before Salman Khan made a silly statement out of it.
In fact the wrestler took to films in 1952 very reluctantly and on the condition that he'd never play a negative role, will always fight for the good and win over evil. So his earliest avatar on screen, that of a superman or he-man in films like Samson, King Kong, Hercules, Faulad was founded on his victorious innings in wrestling. And in most of these films he had the nubile Mumtaz as his arm candy. It wouldn't be wrong to assert that it was Dara Singh's persona that anticipated the Dharmendra and Akshay Kumar of later generations.
Action sequences like these in Trip To Moon held the audience in thrall. Leave alone humans even aliens couldn't pin Dara Singh to the ground...
And he battled beautifully even inside a flying plane:
In fact this combination of macho films and excellence in wrestling made him an icon who wasn't just an object of fantasy but believable and convincing too. He was an icon who was both fictional as well as rooted in reality. No wonder his stunts on screen were never questioned, never dismissed off with disbelief. There is an anecdote about why Manmohan Desai chose him to play Big B's father in Mard. It was because no other actor would have been credible and compelling enough in the scene where he had to stop a whole big aeroplane with ropes and his two hands (3.26 onwards):
The strong man with a soft heart Dara Singh could make anything possible, seemed invincible. Even at 84 you felt he would win his duel with heart attack. But then perhaps death appealed to his soft, emotional side, persuaded him that it was time to go. And he relented in his usual good-natured and affable way.
From the archives:
Madhu Jain saw Dara Singh and Girish Karnad lunching together at the IIC in Delhi
Saeed Naqvi asked Naseeruddin Shah about one actor he looked up to: “Dara Singh—now Bheem, now Hanuman.”
Dara Singh was India's own Arnold Schwarzenegger but he had no option but to make himself what he became through the hard way.He possessed personal traits that we can commend to a foreigner any day too,yet we Indians failed grievously to learn anything from him.Trashing of sterling personal traits is a national pastime with us in this noisy over-distracted nation where we,like Eliot's Sweeney, measure out our lives in coffee spoonfuls of momentary excitements!
With the death of Dara Sing, an era comes to an end in the Indian style wrestling and the Indian Film Industry. The significance of Dara Singh can be better appreciated only when we think of the period he lived and excelled in wrestling. Dara Singh built his career during a period of utter poverty in India where present day facilities were a luxury. Defying these odds of modern sports infrastructure and facilities and limelight, he reached the winning post even under a loser’s trying circumstances. Admittedly, he gained popularity as a wrestler in the backdrop of overall backwardness in the country. Surprisingly, he carved a niche of his own in the arena of wrestling and in the field of acting surprising many of his contemporaries. Interestingly, his performance as Hanumanji in the magnum opus of the late Ramanad Sagar aired in Doordarshan with unmatched viewership stands out as his best remembered performance. His stellar appearance in the serial had lent credence to the role of Hanumanji and the serial itself. If the reports are to be believed, Dara Singh was a down-to-earth human being despite his enviable success. That his co-stars and his directors paid rich tribute and heaped encomiums after encomiums on him prove the man’s wonderful personality.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT