Thank you very much, Sir. Considering the limitation of time, I have only a couple of points to make. The first and foremost, let me say, in principle, is, I am not opposed to the formulation of these rules to put restrictions which, I believe, are reasonable.
My first point really, Sir, to the hon. Minister is, these rules are not in consonance with the best international practices. If you look at the Report called Detailed Country-by-Country information on Internet censorship is provided by the OpenNet Initiative or Reporters Without Borders or Freedom House, all these Reports suggest that most of these restrictions in other countries are somewhat milder and somewhat narrower as has been defined under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of the US. So, the hon. Minister may like to review the entire framework of these rules to put these rules at par with the best international practices.
My second point really is, many of the words and terms which have been used, particularly in Article 3 of these rules, are ambiguous in nature, because these have not been defined either in the rules or necessarily in the parent Act.
My third point really is, in the application of these rules, they are not at par with the restrictions which are available on the other forms of media. So, it would be somewhat restrictive if only these rules are applicable to one particular form in which communication is being done and really not applicable to other forms. My fourth point really Sir, is, some of these restrictions could, the hon. Minister may like to consider, be in consonance with the provisions of Article 19(1) constituting an infringement of the Right of the Freedom of Speech.
The fifth point is, there is lack of transparency in relation to the application of these rules.
And, my last point really on this is, there is a presumption that all complaints which are filed for removal of offensive matter are necessarily correct. This is particularly sad when the person who has initially put it on the net is not being heard and action is taken unilaterally.
I would, therefore, end by saying that the hon. Minister may like to review all these things. And pending a review of this, send it to the Council which is mandatory and which can review the best international practice and bring it on the best footing for that.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT